The regional community’s request for the quality of farm food (based on the example of residents of the Stavropol Krai, Russian Federation)

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The article is devoted to the definition of the regional community’s request for the quality of farm food products through their perception models. The topic of food quality assessment from the consumers’ point of view is relevant and is widely discussed in the scientific community. The directions of modern discourse in the subject area are: systematic state control over compliance with regulatory requirements for the production and food quality; strengthening consumer confidence and ensuring public health through nutrition; characteristics of a food product in terms of the information load of packaging, its environmental friendliness for high-quality product storage, subsequent disposal of packaging materials; promotion of modern technologies for processing, storage, and waste disposal. In the empirical part of the study we developed model for studying the request of the regional community for the quality of farm food. It was used in a survey of the population of Stavropol Krai (Russia). The survey of 812 respondents was organized in electronic form. The database was processed by the SPSS Statistics program (version 27) – factor analysis, Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. The actual model of consumer request for the quality of farm food consists of 2 structural components: commitment to certain producers – the choice of farm food products based on trust in the brand, official information and labelling; situational choice of farm food products based on a visual assessment of the product, packaging and current price. The obtained research data will help the farming community to position their products correctly and consider the prospects of going beyond the region.

Авторлар туралы

Valentina Ivashova

Stavropol State Agrarian University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: vivashov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7670-7278
SPIN-код: 2416-6150
Scopus Author ID: 56203510400

Candidate of Social Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department for Monitoring Educational and Social Processes

 

Ресей, 12, Zootekhnicheskiy Lane, Stavropol, 355017, Russian Federation

Dmitry Gritsai

Stavropol State Agrarian University

Email: gritcay_kirill@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3277-9461
SPIN-код: 4267-4394
Scopus Author ID: 57188722665

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of "Machines and Technologies of Agroindustrial complex"

 

Ресей, 12, Zootekhnicheskiy Lane, Stavropol, 355017, Russian Federation

Lyubov Vysochkina

Stavropol State Agrarian University

Email: lubasha_vis_67@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2362-1585
SPIN-код: 3608-6717
Scopus Author ID: 57189055693

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department "Processes and Machines in Agribusiness"

 

Ресей, 12, Zootekhnicheskiy Lane, Stavropol, 355017, Russian Federation

Alexander Isayenko

Moscow Finance and Law University

Email: isaenko.aleksandr@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7086-7724
SPIN-код: 8870-6697

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Dean of the Faculty, Associate Professor of the Department of Management

 

Ресей, 1A, Vvedensky Str., Moscow, 115191 Russian Federation

Valerii Reimer

Federal State Budget Scientific Institution Federal Research Center All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Soybean; Moscow Finance and Law University

Email: Reymer.V@mfua.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5858-0464

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Research

 

Ресей, 19, Ignatyevskoye Shosse, Blagoveshchensk, Amur Region, 675028, Russian Federation; 1A, Vvedensky Str., Moscow, 115191 Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Rambler. (2023). A third of farm products will be sold online by 2025. Finance Rambler. Retrieved from https://finance.rambler.ru/economics/50161926-tret-fermerskoy-produktsii-budet-prodavatsya-onlayn-k-2025-godu/
  2. Aschemann-Witzel, J., Asioli, D., Banovic, M., Perito, M. A., & Peschel, A. O. (2023). Consumer understanding of upcycled foods - Exploring consumer-created associations and concept explanations across five countries. Food Quality and Preference, 112, 105033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105033. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/utyjal
  3. Atimango, A. O., Wesana, J., Kalule, S. W., Verbeke, W., & De Steur, H. (2024). Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 87, 103127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103127. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/iubiqm
  4. Azlie, W. E., Zahari, M. S. M., Majid, H. N. A., & Hanafiah, M. H. (2023). To what extent does consumers’ perceived health consciousness regarding organic food influence their dining choices at organic restaurants? An empirical investigation. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 34, 100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.100843. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/kitlba
  5. Bakharev, V. V., Mityashin, G. Yu., & Stepanova, T. V. (2023). Food security, food waste and food sharing: The conceptual analysis. Food Systems, 6(3), 390-396. https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2023-6-3-390-396. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/snghjj
  6. Bartková, L., & Veselovská, L. (2024). Consumer behaviour under the dual quality of products: did testing manage to reveal what consumers experience? IIMB Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2024.05.001
  7. Berri, A., & Toma, L. (2023). Factors influencing consumer use of social supermarkets in the UK: A redistribution model providing low-cost surplus food. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 10, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100133. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/hvvvxj
  8. Boccia, F., & Tohidi, A. (2024). Analysis of green word-of-mouth advertising behavior of organic food consumers. Appetite, 198, 107324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107324. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ejmwrg
  9. Chiffoleau, Y., Dourian, T., Enderli, G., Mattioni, D., Akermann, G., Loconto, A., Galli, F., Emese, G., Perényi, Z., Colombo, L., Massari, S., & Desclaux, D. (2024). Reversing the trend of agrobiodiversity decline by co-developing food chains with consumers: A European survey for change. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.032. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/psbwdr
  10. Costa, M. J., Sousa, I., Moura, A. P., Teixeira, J. A., & Cunha, L. M. (2024). Food fraud conceptualization: An exploratory study with Portuguese consumers. Journal of Food Protection, 87(7), 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100301. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wvqnpq
  11. Ditlevsen, K., Denver, S., Christensen, T., & Lassen, J. (2020). A taste for locally produced food - Values, opinions and sociodemographic differences among ‘organic’ and ‘conventional’ consumers. Appetite, 147, 104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104544. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tnqdez
  12. Felletti, S., Marchetti, N., De Luca, Ch., Catani, M., Nosengo, Ch., Compagnin, G., Bozza, D., Franchina, F. A., Pasti, L., & Cavazzini, A. (2024). Recent developments and future perspectives of chiral liquid chromatography for food safety and quality. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 176, 117740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117740. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/bvycwv
  13. Gómez-Llorente, H., Hervás, P., Pérez-Esteve, E., Barat, L. M., & Fernández-Segovia, I. (2022). Nanotechnology in the agri-food sector: Consumer perceptions. NanoImpact, 26, 100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2022.100399. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/jdvodz
  14. Hempel, C. (2024). A segmentation and characterization of consumers affected by rising food prices. Appetite, 194, 107192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.107192. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/znpjft
  15. Ikramov, R., Mityashin, G., & Bakharev, V. (2021). Waste-free stores in Russia: A retrospective analysis, criticism, and analysis of the visitor’s attitude. E3S Web of Conferences, 284, 11016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128411016. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dmypwb
  16. Jürkenbeck, K., von Steimker, F., & Spiller, A. (2024). Consumer’s perception of food pairing products with usual, novel and unusual flavour combinations: A segmentation approach. Appetite, 196, 107270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107270. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vxdvcr
  17. Kamboj, S., Matharu, M., & Gupta, M. (2023). Examining consumer purchase intention towards organic food: An empirical study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 9, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100121. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pdkizg
  18. Kim, H. W., Cho, T. J., Kim, S. A., & Rhee, M. S. (2022). Consumer trend of using ready-to-use salted napa cabbage at home: Current consumer behaviors, beliefs, and opinions about the main ingredient of kimchi. Journal of Food Protection, 85(12). https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-22-022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/kakocg
  19. Kotliarov, I. D. (2022). Heterogeneity of stakeholders as an obstacle to the development of agricultural cooperatives in Russia. Russian Peasant Studies, 7(4), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2022-7-4-20-32. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ljkeen
  20. Liu, Zh., Li, X., Wu, Ch., Zhang, R., & Khan Durrani, D. (2022). The impact of expectation discrepancy on food consumers’ quality perception and purchase intentions: Exploring mediating and moderating influences in China. Food Control, 133(B), 108668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108668. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/eaxduo
  21. Luo, N., Xu, D., Xing, B., Yang, X., & Sun, Ch. (2024). Principles and applications of convolutional neural network for spectral analysis in food quality evaluation: A review. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 128, 105996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.105996. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dlfhbe
  22. Luu, H. P., Tran, T. T. H., & Truong, T. X. (2023). Factors affecting consumers’ food safety behavior in Vietnam. Food Control, 143, 109294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109294. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xxnckj
  23. Macall, D. M., Williams, C., Gleim, S., & Smyth, S. J. (2021). Canadian consumer opinions regarding food purchase decisions. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100098. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dakksh
  24. Marín-Díaz, A., Alvarez-Risco, A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, Sh., Rojas-Cangahuala, G., & Yáñez, J. A. (2024). Evaluating the intention to purchase genetically modified food by consumers in Panama. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 16, 101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101194. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/cvtosg
  25. Melnikov, A. B., Mikhailushkin, P. V., & Kotok, N. Yu. (2021). Assessment of the level of food security in the world. International Agricultural Journal, 1(379). https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-6740-2021-1-4-6. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/cbrsen
  26. Michno, L. A., Schutko, A. P., & Tuturzhans, L. V. (2021). Induced plant immunity as a factor of an integrated winter wheat disease protection system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 624(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/624/1/012012. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/cebwo
  27. Nadricka, K., Millet, K., & Aydinli, A. (2024). Are consumers more or less averse to wasting organic food? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102222. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/loskef
  28. Petrova, A. V., & Donskova, L. A. (2022). Marketing approach to consumer product packaging. Economics and Business: theory and practice, 2(84). https://doi.org/10.24412/2411-0450-2022-284-144-148. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/jjdin
  29. Pereira das Neves, C., Eves, A., Lameiro Rodrigues, K., Fagundes de Mello, J., Kuka Valente Gandra, T., & Avila Gandra, E. (2024). Applying the theory of planned behavior with optimistic bias to understand food safety behaviors of young and middle-aged highly educated Brazilian consumers. Food Control, 163, 110551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110551. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xnufhg
  30. Qi, Sh., Hamed, E. M., Ma, P., Cao, W., Fong Yau Li, S., & Wang, Z. (2024). Perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) served as an emerging optical indicator for food safety and quality assessment: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 514, 215925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.215925. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xjqvmk
  31. Rini, L., Schouteten, J. J., Faber, I., Frøst, M. B., Perez-Cueto, F. J. A., & De Steur, H. (2024). Social media and food consumer behavior: A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 143, 104290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104290. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/muoupa
  32. Rizo, A., Bartu, A., Laguna, L., & Tarrega, A. (2023). Effect of an opinion app on expectations and emotional responses of young consumers toward white wines. Food Quality and Preference, 103, 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104706. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/qselqv
  33. Rybak, G., Burton, Sh., & Berry, Ch. (2024). Reducing the negative impact of ultra-processed foods: Consumer response to natural claims, organic claims, and processing level disclosures. Journal of Business Research, 177, 114588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114588. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pkhejq
  34. Seo, Y., & Shigi, R. (2024). Understanding consumer acceptance of 3D-printed food in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 454, 142225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142225. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vaqnvr
  35. Shahzad, Kh., Zhang, Q., Zafar, A. U., Shahzad, M. F., & Liu, W. (2024). Consumers’ concerns and the role of blockchain technology in mobile food delivery applications. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 32, 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100877. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/lxxwmz
  36. Sharma, Ch., & Deutsch, J. M. (2023). Upcycling in the context of biotechnology-based solutions for food quality, loss, and consumer perception. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 81, 102920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102920. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/lfprmr
  37. Shutko, A. P., Shek, E. G., Tuturzhans, L. V., Mikhno, L. A., & Pashkova, E. V. (2021). Sustainable Phytosanitary Development of the Host-Parasite System on the Example of Head Blight of Winter Wheat. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 206, 1037-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72110-7_114. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/omryvq
  38. Shutko, A. P., Repukhova, N. V., Tuturzhans, L. V., & Mikhno, L. A. (2021). Potato moth (Phthorimaea operculella Zeller) regulation methods and reducing phytosanitary risks of its spread. Research on Crops, 22(Special Issue), 35-37. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2021.009. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gekmpy
  39. Shutko, A. P., Oleynikov, Yu. A., Tuturzhans, L. V., & Mikhno, L. A. (2022). The Dynamics of Biological Diversity of Pests Within Agrocenosises of Agricultural Crops as a Factor of Digitalization in Plant Protection. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 264. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7633-8_22. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dencmz
  40. Song, K.-B., Lê, S., Kim, H.-R., Yoo, S.-M., Kang, M.-S., Chu, H.-N., Hwang, I.-N., & Hong, J.-H. (2024). Consumer-driven characterization of healing foods using Q methodology and Q based sorting. Food Quality and Preference, 117, 105181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105181. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ptyvlg
  41. Soós, G., & Lugasi, A. (2024). Consumer attitude research regarding food hypersensitivity. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 36, 100918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100918. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/mzhxog
  42. Spendrup, S., Bergstrand, K.-J., Thörning, R., & Hultberg, M. (2024). Consumer attitudes towards hydroponic cultivation of vegetables - Specifically exploring the impact of the fertilisation strategy (using mineral origin or food waste as fertilisers). Food Quality and Preference, 113, 105085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105085. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/somldk
  43. Truong, V. A., Lang, B., & Conroy, D. M. (2022). When food governance matters to consumer food choice: Consumer perception of and preference for food quality certifications. Appetite, 168, 105688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105688. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gsetic
  44. Van der Merwe, D., Bosman, M., & Ellis, S. (2014). Consumers’ opinions and use of food labels: Results from an urban−rural hybrid area in South Africa. Food Research International, 63, A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.032
  45. Wahab, Y. A., Al-Ani, L. A., Khalil, I., Schmidt, S., Tran, N. N., Escribà-Gelonch, M., Wai Woo, M., Davey, K., Gras, S., Hessel, V., & Julkapli, N. M. (2024). Nanomaterials: A critical review of impact on food quality control and packaging. Food Control, 163, 110466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110466. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dcbhcy
  46. Wendt, M.-C., & Weinrich, R. (2023). Consumer Segmentation for Pesticide-free Food Products in Germany. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.10.005. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ibtzrc
  47. Zaleskiewicz, H., Kulis, E., Siwa, M., Szczuka, Z., Banik, A., Grossi, F., Chrysochou, P., Tore Nystrand, B., Perrea, T., Samoggia, A., Xhelili, A., Krystallis, A., & Luszczynska, A. (2024). Geographical context of European consumers’ choices of alternative protein food: A systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 117, 105174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105174. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/adispj
  48. Zhao, S., Wu, J., Guo, Zh., Wang, D., Chen, J., Liu, Q., Ding, Ch., Guo, L., & Tao, T. (2024). Magnetic field technology in improving the quality of food refrigeration and freezing: Mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Journal of Stored Products Research, 106, 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102254. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vrlqtd

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қол жетімді Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».