Substrates for the isolation of bacteriocins: review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Due to the increasing demand for fish products, the stock of wild fish is continuously being depleted. This leads to a high level of aquaculture development in the world. The high content of microorganisms in the water, including pathogenic ones, can negatively affect its quality and safety. Salmonella is a particular danger to aquaculture facilities. Hydrobionts can be carriers of this bacterium, which, when ingested, causes acute intestinal infection. This is especially important when eating raw products such as mussels, mollusks, and fresh fish. Currently, antibiotics are used to combat pathogenic microorganisms, the negative effects of which have been proven all over the world. In this regard, there is an urgent need to find effective solutions aimed at combating the negative impact of pathogenic microorganisms on aquaculture facilities. The use of bacteriocins, which cause the suppression of growth and death of pathogenic microorganisms, is considered promising. The effectiveness of probiotic drugs and bacteriocins can be improved by using beneficial bacterial strains present in the natural habitat of animals. This approach will make it possible to create specialized lines of probiotic drugs of different spectrum of action (antioxidant, antimutagenic, enzymatic, and others) that will promote the development of animal husbandry and minimize the use of antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial diseases. To create an effective feed additive based on bacteriocins in the fight against salmonella, it is necessary to select optimal conditions for the cultivation of new producing strains for maximum bacteriocin yield.

Purpose. Review and identification of potential culture media for growing bacterial strains present in the natural habitat of animals producing targeted bacteriocins.

Materials and methods. In the course of the study, a comparative analytical method was applied. The information base is based on the analysis of data presented in open scientific publications. Literary sources were searched in abstract and information databases, including eLibrary, the Russian State Library, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, Google Scholar, National MedLine, the Wiley online Library and others. The following key terms were used as search queries: “Salmonella”, “bacteriocin”, “subiectum”, “bacterial iactatio”, “probiotic”, “prebiotic”, “salmonellosis” – both individually and in various combinations. No time limits were set for the search in order to cover the most representative array of publications.

Results. Yeast extract, peptone and glucose are universal additives in nutrient media for the isolation of bacteriocins. These components are found in almost all of the above-mentioned nutrient media, which indicates their likely high efficiency as sources of carbon and nitrogen. The use of molasses, soybean meal, wheat bran, and an enzymatic solution from lignocellulose waste proved to be worthy substrates not only in terms of the productivity of the bacteriocins themselves, but also in terms of the economic efficiency of the substrates. Wheat bran, lignocellulose waste, soybean meal, molasses are secondary raw materials. The use of secondary products and products of plant origin having prebiotic properties (for instance, a grain pile of wheat in the early stages of ripeness) as substrates for the isolation of bacteriocins is effective and is aimed at resource conservation.

Conclusion. The use of new bacterial strains isolated from natural habitats in order to produce bacteriocins in aquaculture will contribute to the development of animal husbandry and minimize the use of antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial diseases.

About the authors

Tatiana S. Dmitrienko

Don State Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: taniadmitrienko666@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-0385-797X
SPIN-code: 7273-2799

Engineer of the Laboratory “Biochemical and Spectral Analysis of Food Products”

 

Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Maltseva

Don State Technical University

Email: tamaltseva.donstu@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3973-6846
Scopus Author ID: 57219444434

Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department “Technologies and Equipment for Processing Agricultural Products”, Head of the Laboratory “Biochemical and Spectral Analysis of Food Products”

 

Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Victoria N. Shevchenko

Don State Technical University

Email: vikakhorosheltseva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5001-4959
SPIN-code: 8026-6860
Scopus Author ID: 1031771

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Deputy Dean of the Faculty “Agribusiness”, Senior Researcher of the Research laboratory “Agrobiotechnology Center”

 

Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Ekaterina N. Kosolapova

Don State Technical University

Email: rewarewarewak@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4010-925X
SPIN-code: 9207-7553

Assistant of the Department “Food Production Equipment and Technologies”

 

Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Starostin

Don State Technical University

Email: ddmmiitr2004@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-2444-1720
SPIN-code: 1277-5492

3rd Year Student

 

Russian Federation, 1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Official website. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/home/ru
  2. Federal State Statistics Service. Official website. Retrieved from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/?ref=genderguides.ru
  3. Petrova, Yu. V., Lyubomirova, V. N., & Liberman, A. A. (2020). Characterization of fish chemical composition. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 129(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14628. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WIZXQM
  4. Robertson, P. A. W., O’Dowd, C., Burrells, C., Williams, P., & Austin, B. (2000). Use of Carnobacterium sp. as a probiotic for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Aquaculture, 185(3–4), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00349-X. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AFGRAB
  5. Loo, K. Y., et al. (2020). Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Vibrio spp. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(4), 2590–2608. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12460. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CSMTBP
  6. Simons, A., Alhanout, K., & Duval, R. E. (2020). Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides from bacteria origin: Overview of their biology and their implementation against multidrug resistant bacteria. Microorganisms, 8(5), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050639. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JEJKWS
  7. Chervotkina, D. R., & Borisova, A. V. (2022). Antimicrobial preparations of natural origin: Overview of properties and prospects for application. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, 12(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2022-12-2-254-267. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EKZZBE
  8. Chizhaeva, A. V., et al. (2021). Advantages of using probiotics based on lactic acid bacteria in aquaculture. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, (9), 12–16. Retrieved from: https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=13265. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YRWNEC
  9. Bostvironnua, K., & Shleifer, D. (2020). Probiotics work even in the presence of antibiotics. Compound Feeds, (1), 109–112. Retrieved from: https://kombi-korma.ru/sites/default/files/2/01_20/2020_01_109-112.pdf. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CCQTUE
  10. Nayak, A., et al. (2022). Potential application of bacteriocins for sustainable aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, (14), 1234–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12647. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XSLLWO
  11. Wei, Z., et al. (2021). A novel subtilin-like lantibiotics subtilin JS-4 produced by Bacillus subtilis JS-4, and its antibacterial mechanism against Listeria monocytogenes. LWT, (142), 110993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110993. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VQOPVO
  12. Knipe, H., et al. (2021). Probiotics and competitive exclusion of pathogens in shrimp aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 13(1), 324–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12477. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SHNWRU
  13. Han, S. R. (2020). Bacillus subtilis inhibits viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus infection in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) intestinal epithelial cells. Viruses, 13(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010028. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FDQRZZ
  14. Ye, P. A., et al. (2021). Purification and characterization of a novel bacteriocin from Lactobacillus paracasei ZFM54. LWT, (143), 111125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111125. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CGGALN
  15. Fadare, O. S., et al. (2022). In vitro evaluation of the synbiotic effect of probiotic Lactobacillus strains and garlic extract against Salmonella species. LWT, (153), 112439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112439. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UHGKIR
  16. Nalle, R. P. I., et al. (2021). Effect of sanitizers and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R23 on the growth of Salmonella spp. in raw chicken fillets during temperature abuse storage. Food Research, (5), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(5).029. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WBSETE
  17. Evangelista, A. G., et al. (2023). Bioprotective potential of lactic acid bacteria for Salmonella in vitro. Veterinary Research Communications, (47), 1357–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10083-4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BKTUVH
  18. Twomey, et al. (2021). Recipe for success: Suggestions and recommendations for the isolation and characterisation of bacteriocins. International Journal of Microbiology, (19), 9990635. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9990635
  19. Mikhailov, V. V., Andryukov, B. G., & Lyapun, I. N. (2019). Search and selection of bacteriocin-producing strains of marine bacteria from ecosystems of the Sea of Japan. Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Virology, 37(4), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.17116/molgen201937041173. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZEVASC
  20. Pokhilenko, V. D., et al. (2022). Isolation and characterization of bacteriocin strain Bacillus subtilis, isolated from passionflower. Bacteriology, 7(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.20953/2500-1027-2022-1-9-17. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WJHTEO
  21. Garmasheva, I. L., & Oleschenko, L. T. (2023). Screening of bacteriocin producing dairy Enterococcus strains using low-cost culture media. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1168835. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EHVVCT
  22. Furlaneto Maia, L., et al. (2020). Antimicrobial activity of enterocins against Listeria sp. and other food spoilage bacteria. Biotechnology, (2), 797–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-020-02810-7. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVOFEX
  23. Darbandi, A., et al. (2022). Bacteriocins: Properties and potential use as antimicrobials. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 36, e24093. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24093. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WVQQDT
  24. Bússolo, T. B., et al. (2022). Soybean flour as a substrate to obtain Enterococcus durans bacteriocins. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 46, e008022. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054202246008022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FTQBOU
  25. Ogundare, O. C., et al. (2021). Biopreservative application of bacteriocins obtained from samples Ictalurus punctatus and fermented Zea mays African. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 15(8), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2017.8443. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FSIGCX
  26. Parlindungan, E., Dekiwadia, C., & Jones, O. A. (2021). Factors that influence growth and bacteriocin production in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum B21. Process Biochemistry, 107, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2021.05.009. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XOJESY
  27. Mercado, V., & Olmos, J. (2022). Bacteriocin production by Bacillus species: Isolation, characterization, and application. Probiotics & Antimicrobial Proteins, 14, 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-022-09966-w. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WTDSGD
  28. Saidumohamed, B. E., et al. (2021). A magainin-2-like bacteriocin BpSl14 with anticancer action from gut Bacillus safensis SDG14. Analytical Biochemistry, 627(15), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2021.114261. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LKMZVZ
  29. Xiang, Y. Z., et al. (2021). Purification and antibacterial properties of a novel bacteriocin against Escherichia coli from Bacillus subtilis isolated from blueberry ferments. LWT, 146, 111456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111456. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KVAKSF
  30. Sugita, H., et al. (1998). Production of the antibacterial substance by Bacillus sp. strain NM-12, an intestinal bacterium of Japanese coastal fish. Aquaculture, 165(3–4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00267-1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ABQOHB
  31. Carraturo, A., et al. (2006). Inhibition of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by a bacteriocin like inhibitory substance (BLIS) produced by Vibrio mediterranei 1. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 101(1), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02909.x. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PWISGP
  32. Shao, Y., et al. (2021). Isolation and purification of a new Bacillus subtilis strain from deer dung with antimicrobial and anticancer activities. Current Medical Science, 41(4), 832–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2383-5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IJBFJK
  33. Rani, P., Singh, B., & Tiwari, S. K. (2025). Bacteriocin production by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LD1 in solid state fermentation using lignocellulosic substrates. Fermentation, 11(4), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040233. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AAKPJG
  34. Dai, J., et al. (2022). Isolation and identification of new source of bacteriocin producing Lactobacillus plantarum C010 and growth kinetics of its batch fermentation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 38(67). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-022-03244-1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WSFSSJ
  35. Meskhi, B., et al. (2025). Early maturity wheat as a highly valuable feed raw material with prebiotic activity. Agriculture, 15(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202501.1102.v1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XZYBFK
  36. Costa Trigo, I., et al. (2021). Enhancing the saccharification of pretreated chestnut burrs to produce bacteriocins. Journal of Biotechnology, (329), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.01.010. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GWXNCS
  37. Lamas, A., et al. (2021). An overview of Salmonella biofilms and the use of bacteriocins and bacteriophages as new control alternatives. In Salmonella spp.: A Global Challenge. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98208
  38. Agroinvestor. (2025). Salmonellosis on an industrial scale: What risks does the Salmonella bacterium pose for livestock enterprises and consumers? Retrieved from: https://www.agroinvestor.ru/technologies/article/32350-salmonellez/ (Accessed: June 20, 2025)
  39. Bren, A. B., Mazanko, M. S., Prazdnova, E. V., et al. (2022). Method for identifying promising probiotic strains from natural environments [Patent No. 2 772 351 C1 Russian Federation, IPC C12N 1/20, A61K 35/74]. Application No. 2021127457 (filed September 18, 2021); published May 19, 2022. Applicant: Don State Technical University (federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UQZSYO

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).