Comparative analysis of investigative tactics of foreign countries in relation to digital data
- Authors: Ezeibe P.E1
-
Affiliations:
- Kuban State University
- Issue: Vol 8, No 8 (2025)
- Pages: 59-64
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-5693/article/view/377184
- ID: 377184
Cite item
Abstract
the purpose of the article is to conduct a comparative analysis of investigative tactics of foreign countries, to determine the possibility of their adaptation to the conditions of the Russian criminal process. The author examines the legal and organizational and technical foundations of the collection, recording, storage, analysis and use of digital data in criminal proceedings using the example of the United States, Great Britain and France. The analysis showed that the priority of judicial control, documentation of procedures and expert verification of digital data are common to all three jurisdictions. At the same time, approaches differ in the degree of procedural formalization: the American model is based on constitutional guarantees of privacy and strict authentication standards, the British model is based on professional standardization and independent audit, the French model is based on high formalization and institutional centralization. The introduction of the institute of digital evidence authentication, expert certification and judicial control over access to encrypted information into the Russian legal system will help to increase the reliability and procedural security of digital evidence.
References
- Ищенко П.П. Следственные действия в условиях цифровизации уголовного судопроизводства // Сибирские уголовно-процессуальные и криминалистические чтения. 2022. № 1. С. 30 – 42.
- Овчинникова О.В. Производство дистанционных следственных действий: опыт зарубежных стран // Правопорядок: история, теория, практика. 2023. №3 (38). С. 87 – 91.
- Приказ СК России от 08.08.2013 N 53 "Об организации работы следователей-криминалистов в Следственном комитете Российской Федерации" // СПС Консультант Плюс. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_219616/ (дата обращения: 19.07.2025)
- Фокин А.Д., Принципы и тактика проведения следственного осмотра интернет-ресурса при расследовании дистанционного мошенничества в сфере недвижимости // Российский следователь. 2025. № 3. С. 2 – 7.
- Aitchison S. Comment, Privacy in the Cloud: The Fourth Amendment Fog // Washington Law Review. 2018. Vol. 93. № 2. P. 1019 – 1055.
- Code de proc?dure p?nale. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006071154/ (дата обращения: 30.09.2025)
- Constitution of the United States. Fourth Amendment. URL: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/ (дата обращения: 17.07.2025)
- Digital Forensics and Crime. URL: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/POST-PN-0520/POST-PN-0520.pdf (дата обращения: 25.07.2025)
- Forensic science providers: codes of practice and conduct. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/forensic-science-providers-codes-of-practice-and-conduct (дата обращения: 26.07.2025)
- Fussey P., Sandhu A.. Surveillance arbitration in the era of digital policing // Theoretical Criminology. 2020. Vol. 26(1). P. 3 – 22.
- Meissonnier A., Banat-Berger F. French legal framework of digital evidence // Records Management Journal. 2015. Vol. 25. P. 96 – 106.
- Noland A. Current Challenges of Digital Forensics // Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science. 2024. Vol. 12. Iss. 1. Article 1.
- Special Publication 800-101 Revision 1, Guidelines on Mobile Device Forensics. URL: https://csrc.nist.gov/news/2014/sp-800-101-revision-1,-guidelines-on-mobile-device (дата обращения: 22.07.2025)
- The cost of cybercrime statistics is projected to be $10.5 trillion annually by 2025. URL: https://deepstrike.io/blog/cybercrime-statistics-2025 (дата обращения: 11.07.2025)
Supplementary files
