Редакция саясаты
Журнал тақырыбы
The main objectives of the journal: to highlight and discuss the scientific, social and cultural importance of Bakhtin’s creative heritage, the relevance of dialogue in today’s multicultural world, the viability the thinker’s ideas for the development of philosophy, philology and other disciplines in the humanities in the context of globalization and the transformation of the educational environment; to foster cooperation between domestic and international research centres, universities and academic institutions through the study and application of M.M. Bakhtin’s ideas in search of answers to the challenges of the XXI century.
M. Bakhtin’s biography in socio-cultural context
- Problems of Bakhtin’s intellectual biography
- M. M. Bakhtin’s predecessors and cotemporaries
- «Bakhtin’s library» as a scientific problem
- The «Bakhtin circle» as a cultural phenomenon
- Saransk as a cultural and topographic locus of Bakhtin’s work
M. Bakhtin in the world of philosophy
- The phenomenology of the event and the deed in M. M. Bakhtin’s works and in recent research
- «I» and «Other» in epistemology and anthropology
- Logical schemes of dialogue and trilogue
- M.M. Bakhtin’s concepts in epistemology and the theory of consciousness
- The methodology of science and M. M. Bakhtin’s legacy
M. Bakhtin as a philologist
- Author and hero character in literary works and issues of modern narratology
- Bakhtin’s concept of the chronotope and problems of studying works of art
- Topical issues in the theory of the novel
- Models of the culture of popular laughter in Bakhtin’s book on Rabelais in world literature
- Polyphony in Dostoevsky and in a world literature
- Speech genres and their role in the formation of art
- Problems of linguistics and philosophy of language
- The idea of metalinguistics in Bakhtin’s scientific heritage
M. Bakhtin’s ideas and problems of pedagogy and psychology
- M. M. Bakhtin’s dialogical pedagogy
- M. M. Bakhtin’s pedagogical experience
- M. M. Bakhtin and the practice of teaching in the humanities
- M. M. Bakhtin’s legacy in modern psychology
Bakhtin’s ideas in the modern world
- The «borderlines» of human knowledge and the limits of interdisciplinarity
- Dialogue and nonlinear communication models: global – universal – local
- The reception of M.M. Bakhtin’s ideas in historical perspective
- Bakhtin in the development of the humanities
- Aesthetics and the philosophy of art in the context of Bakhtinian studies
- Bakhtin’s ideas in sociology and social theory
- Translation of Bakhtin’s writings into foreign languages: problems and meanings
- Bakhtin and the values of modern culture
Бөлімдер мен бағыттар
Теоретические исследования
Диалоги
Из архива
Обзоры, рецензии, научная хроника
Рецензиялау
- Review is the process of evaluative analysis of a scientific article submitted for publication in the Journal. A review comprises an independent written scientific work carried out by experts in the same subject area as that to which the reviewed work belongs.
- The mandatory review comprises the primary documentation of the examination conducted by the Editorial Board to determine the quality and conformity of the material with the scientific and thematic focus of the Journal.
- The Journal reviews all materials submitted to the Editors corresponding to the format and subject matter, with a view to their expert evaluation.
- Leading experts in the field of the peer-reviewed materials, who have published on a similar topic in the last three years, are invited to review articles.
- A reviewer cannot be the author or co-author of the work under review. Manuscripts may not be reviewed by employees of the same institution where the author works or studies in postgraduate or doctoral programs.
- The Journal uses double-blind review of submitted manuscripts. This means that the identities of reviewers and authors are concealed from each other throughout the review process. Any correspondence between the reviewer and the author takes place electronically via the Journal’s website.
- The submission of an article for review is notified by a letter signed by the head of the Editorial Board, in which the deadline for submitting the review (typically three weeks) is indicated. This period is further monitored. In some cases, the reviewer is also sent a memo about the rules for writing reviews.
- Based on the analysis of the article, the reviewer decides: a) to recommend the manuscript for publication without revision or with revision; b) to forward for additional review; c) to reject the manuscript for publication. The compiled review is submitted to the Editorial Board and its conclusions are recorded in electronic form.
- The Editorial Board sends the results of the examination to the authors of the submitted manuscript.
- In the case of an author disagreeing with the comments of the reviewer, his or her reasoned statement will be considered by the Editorial Board.
- Following revision based on the comments of the reviewer, the article is sent for re-review at the discretion of the Editorial Board.
- Reviews are stored in the Journal’s Editorial Office for five years and sent to the Higher
Еркін қолжетімділік саясаты
This Journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
The Publisher grants usage rights to others using an open license (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) allowing for immediate free access to the work and permitting any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose.