Email this article The Sociocultural Environment in Closed Administrative-territorial Formations of the Nuclear Industry in the Urals
- Authors: Kuznetsov V.N.1, Konstantinova A.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of History and Archeology, Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 4, No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 76-82
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4654/article/view/147252
- ID: 147252
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study of such a complex phenomenon as a closed nuclear town is difficult without highlighting separate logical lines and plots. The process of formation and development of the sociocultural environment in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods, determined by a number of macro- and microfactors (secrecy factor, high science intensity of production, and others) is chosen as one of these lines in this article. The authors characterize the sociocultural environment of Ural closed administrative-territorial formations (CATF) of the nuclear industry as a cultural phenomenon, where social and cultural processes closely interact (including activities of various actors in the creation and development of spiritual values, ideas and social norms). Various social institutions - from educational institutions to cultural and leisure institutions - were included in the field of the closed nuclear towns sociocultural environment. Their activities in the period from the second half of the 1940s to the beginning of the 2000s have been studied in this article.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Viktor N. Kuznetsov
Institute of History and Archeology, Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: jurist-istor@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Hist.), senior researcher Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Alfiya G. Konstantinova
Institute of History and Archeology, Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: alfijasharafullina@rambler.ru
Cand. Sci. (Hist.), researcher Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
References
- Voronina N. A., Krivosheev I. A., Shchedrin L.P. Word about Instrument-Making Plant: The History of Public Organizations of the Plant. Chelyabinsk: South Ural publ. house, 2005. 456 p.
- Dubin R. S. Sociocultural space of the city as a multifunctional system in modern scientific discourse. Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. 2020. No. 6 (98). Pp. 24-32.
- Yerokhin V. N. Urban environment and its influence on religious and cultural development // Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Historical Sciences. 2015. No. 2(6). Pp. 13-19.
- Konstantinova A. G. Sociocultural environment of the closed nuclear towns of the Urals in the 1990s // Teaching history at school. 2016. No. 5. Pp. 81-84.
- Kuznetsov V. N. Komsomol in a closed city. Ekaterinburg: JSC «Polygraphist», 2006. 320 p.
- Novoselov V. N. Creation of the nuclear industry in the Urals. Chelyabinsk: Obukhov Publishing House, 1999. 528 p.
- Ryaskov S. A. Life support system of the closed towns of the Urals. Ekaterinburg: Polygraph, 2004. 98 p.
- Tikhonov V. Nuclear missile complex in Russia: staff mobility and security. M., 2000. 95 p.
- Tolstikov V. S. Sociocultural environment of the closed towns of the Urals // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series «Social and Humanitarian Sciences». 2012. No. 10 (269). Pp. 119-123.
- Shub M. L., Zagulyaeva Z. A. Semiotic environment of a closed nuclear town as a marker of local identity // Bulletin of culture and arts. 2022. No. 1(69). Pp. 48-53.
- Zaitseva E., Zapariy V., Bannykh G., Kostina S. CSR of the city-forming enterprises of nuclear industry in Russian //The 7th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (IMES 2019). Prague. May 30-31, 2019. C. 1029-1039.
Supplementary files
