Climate Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The article deals with the climate policy of the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean (LA&C). The place of the region in the global structure of greenhouse gas production, their dynamics in the period 1990 - 2018 is analyzed, the relationship between the economic development of the region and the volume of GHG emissions is demonstrated. The main directions of the climate policy of the LA&C countries, the influence of political, social, and economic factors on the climate policy of individual countries are studied. Alternative ways and strategies of climate policy are shown on the example of Bolivia and Ecuador. An analysis of climate measures and conflict potential on issues of environmental modernization is given. In conclusion, the author's scheme for assessing the level of climate policy of the major states of the region according to their goals set in the framework of the Paris Agreement (UN NDC).

Толық мәтін

##article.viewOnOriginalSite##

Авторлар туралы

Yuri Kovalev

Ural Humanitarian Institute, Ural Federal University named after First President of the Russian Federation B.N. Yeltsin

Email: yykowaljow@gmail.com
Cand. Sci. (Geograph.), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Ural Humanitarian Institute Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Auzan A. A. «Effect of track». The problem of dependence on the trajectory of the previous development - the evolution of hypotheses // Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 6. Economy. 2015. No. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/effekt-kolei-problema-zavisimosti-ot-traektorii-predshestvuyuschego-razvitiya-evolyutsiya-gipotez (date of access: 2.07.2020).
  2. Mikhailova O.V. State in search of a new model of governance. Bulletin of Moscow State University Ser. 21 Management (state and society) No. 1 2013 p. 15-32.
  3. Pimenova R.A. Social and environmental aspects of sustainable development in Latin America Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 5. Geography. no. 6. 2006.pp. 42-45.
  4. Alarcón P., Rocha K., Di Pietro S. Die Yasuní-ITT-Initiative zehn Jahre später Entwicklung und Natur in Ecuador heute// PERIPHERIE Nr. 149, 38. Jg. 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.3224/peripherie.v38i1.03, S. 55-73 c.55 (accessed: 26.02.2022).
  5. Crippa M., Oreggioni G. Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries 2019. Luxembourg. 2019. 251 p.
  6. Engel S. Katastrophen-Alarm! Was tun gegen die mutwillige Zerstörung der Einheit von Menschen und Natur? Gelsenkirchen, 2014.
  7. Grabher G. The Weakness of Strong Ties: The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area// The Embedded Firm: on the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks/ E. bei G. Grabher pp. 255-277 London. 1993.
  8. Jänicke M. Megatrend Umweltinnovationen. Zur ökologischen Modernisierung von Wirtschaft und Staat. München. 2012.
  9. MacDonald G. Climate, Capital, Conflict: Geographies of Success or Failure in the Twenty-First Century-Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110:6 pp. 2011-2031. 2020. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1800300.
  10. Renewables 2021. Global Status Report// UN Environment Program. Paris 2021// URL: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GSR2021_Full_Report.pdf (accessed:16.02.2022).
  11. Simonis G. Handbuch Globale Klimapolitik. Paderborn. 2017.
  12. Santos Da Silva S.R., Miralles-Wilhelm F., Muñoz-Castillo R., Clarke L.E., Braun C.J., Delgado A., et al. (2019) The Paris pledges and the energy-water-land nexus in Latin America: Exploring implications of greenhouse gas emission reductions. PLoS ONE 14(4): e 0215013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215013 (accessed: 1.02.2022).
  13. Svampa M. Die ökoterritoriale Wende in Lateinamerika. //Peters/Rohland/Kaltmeier/Burchardt/ Schnepel (Hrsg.). Krisenklima. Umweltkonflikte aus lateinamerikanischer Perspektive//Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2021 pp.49-65.
  14. Wallbott L., Siciliano G., Lederer M. Beyond PES and REDD+: Costa Rica on the way to climate-smart landscape management? Ecology and Society 24(1):24. 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10476-240124 (accessed: 6.02.2022).
  15. Flagg J.A. An Ecolaboratory for Climate Politics? Costa-Rica`s 2007 Carbon Neutral Pledge// The Ecolaboratory. Environmental Governance and Economic Development in Costa Rica// Robert Fletcher, Brian Dowd-Uribe, Guntra A. Aistara. University of Arizona Press 2020 pp.176-188. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxw3pvp (accessed: 22.02.2022).
  16. Lehmann R. Erneuerbare Energien in Südmexico. Der sozialökologische Konflikt um Windenergieanlagen im Isthmus von Tehuantepec// Peters/Rohland/Kaltmeier/Burchardt/ Schnepel (Hrsg.). Krisenklima. Umweltkonflikte aus lateinamerikanischer Perspektive//Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2021 pp.113-128.
  17. Mauelshagen F., Lopez-Rivera A. Klima-Governance in den Americas// Peters/Rohland/Kaltmeier/Burchardt/ Schnepel (Hrsg.). Krisenklima. Umweltkonflikte aus lateinamerikanischer Perspektive//Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2021 p. 17-47.
  18. Poma M., Buen (Con) VIvir, das gute Leben für alle. Über die Prinzipien des guten Zusammenlebens und das «Paradox» von Entwicklung// Anders Wachsen! //Becker M., Reinicke M (Hrsg.)//München 2018.
  19. Octaviano C. et al. Climate change policy in Brazil and Mexico: Results from the MIT EPPA model / Energy Economics 56, 2016 600-614 Р. 603.


Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>