Nutritional Support Quality Assessment in Burn Patients
- 作者: Strukov E.Y.1, Klimov A.G.1, Timofeev A.B.1, Obukhova O.A.2
-
隶属关系:
- Kirov Military Medical Academy
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
- 期: 卷 5, 编号 3 (2024)
- 页面: 105-113
- 栏目: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4433/article/view/312021
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinutr643464
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RIVQXL
- ID: 312021
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
BACKGROUND: Nutritional support (NS) is a key component of intensive care for burn patients. However, during the course of burn disease, a discrepancy often exists between nutritional demands and the adequacy of their replenishment.
AIM: To assess the quality of NS as part of intensive care in burn patients.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of NS quality was conducted based on the medical records of burn patients with protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) who were admitted to the intensive care unit and had a length of stay exceeding 3 days. On days 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30, the Frank Index (FI), energy requirements (calculated using the Harris–Benedict equation), serum total protein and albumin levels, absolute lymphocyte count, and the energy-protein value of NS were assessed. Based on FI values, mortality, number of infectious complications (IC), length of stay in the intensive care unit, and hospital stay were analyzed. Statistical data processing was carried out using SPSS software, version 20.0. The results are presented as Me [25%; 75%] (median, upper and lower quartiles).
RESULTS: Data from 130 patients (123 males) were analyzed. Median age was 41 years [35.25; 58.25]. Total body surface area burned was 22% [15; 47]. Baseline FI was 47.5 units [32.75; 89.75]. Serum total protein concentration on day 2 was 52.5 g/L [48.0; 59.75], with a significant increase observed on days 10 (54.0 g/L [52.0; 62.25]) and 15 (59.95 g/L [54.25; 65.38]), p < 0.05. During the first 10 days, energy intake was 59.5% [46.7; 53.9] of the target values and reached 95.4% [55.4; 101.8] by day 30. Protein intake on day 10 was 1.15 [0.57; 1.53] g/kg body weight(BW)/day, not meeting target levels during the observation period. In the FI ≥60 group, energy intake on day 10 was 44.1% of the target, and protein intake was 0.88 [0.50; 1.08] g/kg BW/day; in the FI ≤60 group, energy intake was 63.2% of the target, and protein intake was 1.15 [0.57; 1.35] g/kg BW/day (p < 0.05). IC incidence and mortality were higher in the FI ≥60 group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in IC rate or mortality based on baseline PEM severity.
CONCLUSION: During the acute phase of burn disease, energy and protein intake remain significantly below recommended targets. Adequate energy intake is achieved only by day 30, whereas protein intake remains insufficient, especially in patients with FI ≥60 units. Baseline PEM did not affect IC rates or survival.
作者简介
Egor Strukov
Kirov Military Medical Academy
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: e.strukov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5041-1201
SPIN 代码: 3949-3704
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor
俄罗斯联邦, 6 Ak. Lebedeva st., Saint Petersburg, Russia, 194044Aleksey Klimov
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: alexklim1957@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2289-6867
SPIN 代码: 6178-2223
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor
俄罗斯联邦, 6 Ak. Lebedeva st., Saint Petersburg, Russia, 194044Aleksey Timofeev
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: abtim64@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-1598-9405
SPIN 代码: 8956-5603
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 6 Ak. Lebedeva st., Saint Petersburg, Russia, 194044Olga Obukhova
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: obukhova0404@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0197-7721
SPIN 代码: 6876-7701
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, 23 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522参考
- Boyarintsev VV, Evseev MA. Metabolism and nutritional support of the surgical patient: Doctor’s manual. Saint Petersburg: Onley-Press; 2017. 260 p.
- Morgan Jr. JE. Clinical anesthesiology. Book three. Bunyatyan AA, Tseytlin AM, editors. Moscow: BINOM; 2011. 295 с.
- Diagnosis and treatment of burn shock (National clinical recommendations). Moscow: All-Russian public organization ”Association of Combustiologists ”World without Burns”, 2014. 17 p. Available from: http://combustiolog.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Diagnostika-i-lechenie-ozhogovogo-shoka.pdf
- Gerasimova LI. Artificial nutrition in emergency surgery and traumatology. Ermolov AS, Abakumov MM, editors. Moscow: Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Aid; 2001. 389 p. ISBN 5-89688-005-7
- Kostyuchenko AL, Kostin ED, Kurygin AA. Enteral artificial nutrition in intensive medicine. SPb.: Special Literature; 1996. 20 p. EDN: ZDRNXD
- Lavreshin PM, Vladimirova OV, Gobejishvili VK, et al. Thermal and chemical injuries. Electrotrauma: textbook for students, interns, clinical residents, workers of practical health care. Stavropol: StSMU Publishing House; 2017. 144 p. ISBN 978-5-89822-488-2
- Sobotka L, editor. 7 Fundamentals of Clinical Nutrition. 4th edition. European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism; 2011.
- Slastnikov ED, Vlasenko AV, Evdokimov EA, et al. Metabolic status of the patient in the intensive care unit and the choice of methods for its assessment (current state of the issue). Medical Alphabet. 2023;(16):53–72. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2023-16-53-72
- Nunez JH, Clark. Burn Patient Metabolism and Nutrition. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2023;34(4):717–731. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.001
- Shapovalov SG. Combustiology of emergency situations: a tutorial. Aleksanin SS, Alekseev AA, editors. Nikiforov’s All-Russian Center for Emergency and Radiation Medicine, Saint Petersburg: Politekhnikaservis; 2014. 164 p.
- Church A, Zoeller S. Enteral nutrition product formulations: A review of available products and indications for use. Nutr Clin Practice. 2023;38(2):277–300. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10960
- Ilyinsky ME, Lyashchenko YuN, Ryk AA, Bocharov DE. Modern possibilities of reducing the intensity of hypermetabolism in severe thermal injury (literature review). Sklifosovsky Journal. Emergency medical care. 2016;(5):55–64. EDN: WRLGZX
- Radzikowska-Büchner E, Łopuszyńska I, Flieger W, et al. An Overview of Recent Developments in the Management of Burn Injuries. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(22):16357. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216357
- Rousseau A, Losser M, Ichai C, Berger MM. ESPEN endorsed recommendations: nutritional therapy in major burns. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(4):497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.02.012
- Jutba AS, Kamel A, Nguyen Q, et al. Impact of an enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients with burn injuries. Int J Burns Trauma. 2024;14(3):58–64. doi: 10.62347/YGQW7641
- De Waele E, Jakubowski JR, Stocker R, Wischmeyer PE. Review of evolution and current status of protein requirements and provision in acute illness and critical care. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2958–2973. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.12.032
- Mosier MJ, Pham TN, Klein MB, et al. Early enteral nutrition in burns: compliance with guidelines and associated outcomes in a multicenter study. JBCR. 2011;32:104–109. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318204b3be
- Markiewicz-Gospodarek A, Kozioł M, Tobiasz M, et al. Burn Wound Healing: Clinical Complications, Medical Care, Treatment, and Dressing Types: The Current State of Knowledge for Clinical Practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031338
补充文件
