Linguistic and cultural foundations of verbal aggression in the Russian language
- Autores: Lapteva M.L.1, Firsova M.A.1
-
Afiliações:
- Tatishchev Astrakhan State University
- Edição: Volume 21, Nº 4 (2023)
- Páginas: 424-439
- Seção: Cultural Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2618-8163/article/view/324661
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-4-424-439
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GBLHRZ
- ID: 324661
Citar
Resumo
The relevance of the research is determined by the insufficient study of the forms of aggression in the context of culture, as well as insufficient description of the extralinguistic prerequisites of aggression correlated with the subject area of culture, and intra-linguistic means and methods of cultural reference of aggression. The aim of the study is to identify the linguistic and cultural foundations of expressing aggression in the Russian language and to describe the means of its verbalization through the prism of the binary category “Own/ Other”, which is the basis of ethnic conflicts. To achieve this aim, the method of definitional, semantic, linguistic-cultural analysis, descriptive method was used. A sociolinguistic experiment was conducted. Methods of continuous sampling from lexicographic sources and of quantitative calculations of the responses received by the participants of the experiment were applied. The research material included: 1) a corpus of more than 50 lexical and phraseological units of the Russian language taken from dictionaries, which verbalize aggressive attitude towards “foreign” culture and “foreign” ethnos; 2) a range of ethnopholisms obtained in the sociolinguistic experiment among high school students in Astrakhan. It was determined that aggression in the Russian language has a culturological explanation: it is conditioned by identifying the ethnos according to the principle of “own - other”. The linguistic and cultural basis of aggressive semantics is the semantics of “alienness”, which is expressed by demonstrating an obviously negative attitude to “alien”, which is the object of an aggressive action. A special group of lexical means - linguistic and cultural markers of aggression - includes units, negatively characterizing representatives/artifacts of a “foreign” culture. Linguistic and cultural markers of aggression are ethnopholisms. Aggressive nominations of ethnic groups historically residing both far abroad and in the Russian multicultural region are equally relevant in the linguistic consciousness of young people. From extralinguistic positions, the consolidation and activation of hostile lexico-phraseological means in the language are conditioned by the intercultural historical contacts of nations which are currently being reflected in the journalistic discourse, in Internet communication. The perspective of the research is seen in the use of its results for developing the concept of overcoming speech aggression in the educational space, where the factor of hostility has hindered the education of a tolerant personality.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Mariya Lapteva
Tatishchev Astrakhan State University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: hohlina2004@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2412-1299
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Chairperson of the Chair of Modern Russian Language
20a Tatishcheva St, Astrakhan, 414056, Russian FederationMariya Firsova
Tatishchev Astrakhan State University
Email: firsovamariaa@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0008-3819-6586
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the Chair of Modern Russian Language
20a Tatishcheva St, Astrakhan, 414056, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Agar-Hutton, R. (2003). How to deal with verbal agression. London: Troubador.
- Apresyan, V.Yu. (2003). Implicit aggression in language. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialog 2003” (pp. 32-35). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Baker Edwin, C. (2008). Hate speech. Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Baranov, A.N. (2007). Linguistic examination of the text. Moscow: Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Baudhuin, E.S. (1973). Obscene language and evaluative response. An empirical study. Psychological Reports, (32), 399-402.
- Berezovich, E.L., & Gulik, D.P. (2002). Homo ethnicus in the mirror of language: On the methodology of description. Etnolingwistykа: Problemy Jzykа i Kultury, (14), 47-67. Lublin: Uniwеrstytеtu Mаrii CurieSklodowskiej. (In Russ.)
- Brinev, K.I. (2009). Theoretical linguistics and forensic linguistic expertise. Barnaul: ASU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Cherkasova, M.N. (2011). Speech forms of aggression in mass media. Rostov-on-Don: RSTU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Dashkovskiy, Kh. (1995). Verbal aggression. Nauka i Zhizn', (6), 99-101. (In Russ.)
- Dreizin, F., & Priestly, T. (1982). A systematic approach to Russian obscene language. Russian Linguistics, 6(22), 233-249.
- Faizullina, A.G. (2008). Functional aspect of invective composites in multistructural languages. Kazan: KFU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Fedorova, L.L. (1991). Typology of speech influence and its place in the structure of communication. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, (6), 67-82. (In Russ.)
- Fofin, A. I. (2008). Russian and French ethnopholisms as verbal signs of national intolerance. Vestnik Irkutskogo Gosudarstvennogo Lingvisticheskogo Universiteta, (1), 45-51. (In Russ.)
- Galyashina, E.I. (2003). Fundamentals of judicial speech. Moscow: STENSI Publ. (In Russ.)
- Infante, D.A., & Wigley, C.J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, (53), 61-69.
- Issers, O.S. (2008). Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. Moscow: LKI Publ. (In Russ.)
- Korobkova, O. S. (2009). Hate speech indicators in ethnic membership nominations: sociolinguistic aspect. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, (111), 200-205. (In Russ.)
- Lapteva, M.L. (2016). “Own” and “Alien” in the cognitive-discursive space of Russian phrasemics. Moscow: KNORUS Publ.; Astrakhan: AGU, Astrakhanskii Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)
- Lazebnaya, I.B. (2007). Ways of expressing speech aggression in English. Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, (8), 242-254. (In Russ.)
- Leonteva, T.V., & Shchetinina, A.V. (2021). Dictionary of the аctual vocabulary of unity and enmity in the Russian language of the beginning of the XXI century. Ekaterinburg: Azhur Publ. (In Russ.)
- Makovskiy, M.M. (2006). The phenomenon of taboo in the traditions and in the language of Europeans. Essence - forms - development. Moscow: KomKniga Publ. (In Russ.)
- Pekarskaya, E.A. (2009). Speech and behavioral aggression as the cause of communication failures. Vestnik IGLU, (3), 170-174. (In Russ.)
- Seliverstova, E.I., Volkova, L.V., & Ma, X. (2023). An emotion-evoking text in cross-cultural aspect attitude and evalution. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14(1), 260-276. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-1-260-276
- Sharifullin, B.Ya. (2016). Onomastic games in Russian information warfare. Ecology of Language and Communicative Practice, (1), 328-353. (In Russ.)
- Shcherbinina, Yu.V. (2006). Verbal aggression. Moscow: KomKniga Publ. (In Russ.)
- Sheigal, E.I. (1999). Verbal aggression in political discourse. Voprosy Stilistiki, (28), 204-222. (In Russ.)
- Starova, O.E. (2000). Mass media as a source of aggression. Applied Psychology and Psychoanalysis, (2), 15-21. (In Russ.)
- Strossen, N. (1996). Hate speech and pornography: Do we have to choose between freedom of speech and equality? Conferences and Symposia (pp. 465-470). Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University, School of Law.
- Temirgazina, Z.K., & Bachurka, M.S. (2017). Speech acts of an aggressive nature in pedagogical discourse. Speech Genres, (1), 51-57. (In Russ.)
- Vorontsova, T.A. (2006). Speech aggression: Invasion of the communicative space. Izhevsk: Udmurtskii Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)
Arquivos suplementares
