Dynamics of changes in Russian verbal paradigm under the influence of secondary imperfectivation
- Authors: Galeev T.I.1, Bochkarev V.V.1, Solovyev V.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
- Issue: Vol 23, No 2 (2025): MODERN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN KAZAN LINGUISTIC SCHOOL
- Pages: 241-256
- Section: Key Issues of Russian Language Research
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2618-8163/article/view/324727
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2025-23-2-241-256
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DTESPW
- ID: 324727
Cite item
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that the variability of aspectual affixes in the Russian language has not been fully studied. Meanwhile, super-large diachronic corpora of texts provide the opportunity of a detailed quantitative description of verbal affixes evolution. The aim of the study is to identify objective syntagmatic and paradigmatic factors (extrasyllabic synharmonicity, word morphological structure evolution, lexical compatibility, style) that determine the choice of one of the competing suffixes among variable verbs with the redundant paradigm with secondary imperfection -a-(-ya-)/-yva-(-iva-) . The authors used the Russian language corpus of the Google Books Ngram corpus, including data on the word forms frequency over the past 200 years. The authors used methods of corpus analysis and diachronic quantitative analysis. The study revealed psychophonetic, morphological, semantic, and stylistic factors affecting the linguistic changes of redundant verbal paradigms. The authors came to the conclusion that, contrary to popular belief, the former na -a-(-ya-) variant is not replaced with the -iva-(-yva-) form in most cases; according to frequency dynamics, a temporary increase in the popularity of forms of secondary imperfection in general was followed by a return to the primary forms of Imperfect in recent decades. In rare cases, where a form with a suffix denoting iteration is approved, the form was chosen because of the root vowel, “l-epenteticum”, and verb prefixes. The frequency and prevalence of the verb hypothetically preventing the emergence of variants or unification had no effect on language changes. The developed approach can be applied to study evolution of competing word forms in a wide range of cases.
About the authors
Timur I. Galeev
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: tigaleev@kpfu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7322-6225
SPIN-code: 2632-2071
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Russian as a Foreign Language
2 Tatarstan St., Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation.Vladimir V. Bochkarev
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: vbochkarev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8792-1491
SPIN-code: 2596-9131
Researcher at the Research Institute of Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence,
2 Tatarstan St., Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation.Valery D. Solovyev
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: maki.solovyev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4692-2564
SPIN-code: 5791-3820
Doctor of Physico-Mathematical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Applied and Experimental Linguistics
2 Tatarstan St., Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation.References
- Anastasiev, A. I. (1898). Methods of teaching elementary grammar. Kazan. (In Russ.).
- Baudouin de Courtenay, I. A. (1963) Selected works on general linguistics. In 2 vol. Moscow: AN SSSR Publ. (In Russ.).
- Bogoroditskii, V. A. (1911). Lectures on general linguistics. Kazan. (In Russ.).
- Bondarko, A. V. (2002). Theory of meaning in the system of functional grammar: based on the material of the Russian language. Moscow: LRC Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: RBAZID
- Carroll, R., Svare, R., & Salmons, J. (2012). Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics, (2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.2.2.01car
- Dorofeev, Y. V., & Zhuravleva, E. A. (2023). Functional paradigm in Russian studies: from the functioning of units to the regulatory concept of language. Russian Language Studies, 21(1), 49–63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-1-49-63 EDN: ZELCNW
- Galeev, T., Shevlyakova, A., & Bochkarev, V. (2020). The behaviour of Russian competing verbs: A computer-assisted approach. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2780, 145–154. EDN: GJBSQM
- Galeev, T., & Habibulina, E. (2017). Frequency of Verbal Forms and Language Standard. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, (6), 90–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i5.1250
- Galeev, T. I., & Solovyev, V. D. (2016). Methods of application of modern text corpora in the study of the morphological system of Russian verbs Unification of I Productive (irregular) class of Verbs. Quantitative model based on Google Books. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, (Spec. Is.), 177–180.
- Gorbachevich, K. S. (2009). Variability of the word and the language norm: on the basis of the modern Russian language. Moscow: URSS: LIBROKOM Publ. (In Russ.).
- Gorbova, E. V. (2016). Secondary Imperfectivation of the Russian verb according to the corpus study. Język i metoda, 3, 149–158. (In Russ.). EDN: YFPIJD
- Graudina, L. K. (2004). Grammatical correctness of Russian speech. Stylistic dictionary of variants. Moscow: AST: Astrel’ Publ. (In Russ.).
- Klimonov, V. D. (2015). Innovations in the aspect system of the Russian language. Studia Rossica Posnaniensia, 40(1), 155–164. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2015.40.1.15
- Kozera, I. (2018). Semantics and pragmatics of secondary imperfectivization in the modern Russian language on the basis of corpus analysis. Kraków. (In Russ.).
- Krushevskii, N. V. (1883). An essay on the science of language. Kazan. (In Russ.).
- Lieberman, E., Michel, J.-B., Jackson, J., Tang, T., & Nowak, M. A. (2007). Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature, (449), 723–716. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06137
- Lin, Y., Michel, J. B., Lieberman, E. A., Orwant, J., Brockman, W., & Petrov, S. (2012). Syntactic Annotations for the Google Books Ngram Corpus. In Proceedings of the ACL 2012 system demonstrations (pp. 169–174).
- Matezius, V. (1967). The Need for Stability of the Literary Language. In Prazhskii lingvisticheskii kruzhok (pp. 378–399). Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.).
- Paducheva, E. V. (2013). Russian imperfective: invariant and particular meaning. Lomonosov Philology Journal, (4), 7–18. (In Russ.).
- Piperski, A. Ch. (2014). Alternation in the root as a pledge of sustainability: from the history of the strong verbs in German language. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 10(1), 821–831. (In Russ.).
- Rozental’, D. E. (1988). And how is it better to say? Moscow: Prosveshchenie publ. (In Russ.).
- Sahlgren, M. (2008). The Distributional Hypothesis. The Italian Journal of Linguistics, (20), 33–54.
- Smirnov, I. N. (2010). Redundancy in the sphere of verbal word- and form-building. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 6(2), 272–298. (In Russ.). EDN PXHPAJ
- Tatevosov, S. G. (2013). Multiple prefixation and its consequences. Notes on the Physiology of the Russian Verb. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, (3), 42–89. (In Russ.).
- Zdorikova, Y. N., Abyzov, A. A., & Makarova, E. N. (2022). Variations in noun accentuation in the speech of modern youth. Russian Language Studies, 20(1), 68–83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-1-68-83 EDN: CZULTS
- Zeldovich, G. M. (2014). Aspectual triplets: secondary imperfective as the marker of high individuation of situations. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, (28), 9–57. (In Russ.).
- Zhdanova, E. A., & Ratsiburskaya, L. V. (2024). Lexical and word-formation innovations in the Russian-language Internet communication: Productive word-formation models. Russian Language Studies, 22(3), 350–362. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2024-22-3-350-362 EDN: RRNCCG
Supplementary files
