Spiritual energy of the Russian word as a scientific challenge of humanitarian thought
- Authors: Maslova V.A.1, Danich O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov
- Issue: Vol 19, No 2 (2021)
- Pages: 125-137
- Section: Cultural Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2618-8163/article/view/324611
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-2-125-137
- ID: 324611
Cite item
Abstract
The authors consider faith as a direct way to form spirituality of an individual and nation on the whole, as our main moral wealth. This problem is especially relevant in the modern world, since the most important words for national consciousness are now devaluating. The purpose of the research is to prove that the language, namely the word , has resources for creating and accumulating the spiritual potential of the native speaker. The research has been carried on the material of the Bible and the National Corpus of the Russian language (a subcorpus of literary texts published after 1950). The authors used the following research methods: the traditional general scientific methods of analysis, comparison, generalization and the new one - discourse analysis. In the course of the research two aspects of the indicated problem have been considered: the language is a spiritual essence; the word is a barometer of our understanding of the world. The study resulted in the following conclusions: the primary and the most important function of the language is the function of communication with God; the spirituality of the Russian people is formed and preserved thanks to the language, because the language contains deep transcendental meanings, almost inaccessible for rational comprehension. These meanings create and retain spirituality in the society and the individual, form the spiritual code of the nation; fulfil the sacred function of communication with God; reveals the great mystery of the world and the human soul at the same time. These provisions allow to outline the prospects for the future research within the framework of a new stage of the anthropocentric paradigm, which brings it closer to the theo-anthropo-cosmic paradigm as the paradigm of the future. In it, an individual begins to realize his place not above the world, but inside it.
About the authors
Valentina A. Maslova
Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov
Author for correspondence.
Email: mvavit@tut.by
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Preschool and Primary Education
33 Moskovskiy Prospekt, Vitebsk, 210038, Republic of BelarusOksana V. Danich
Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov
Email: odanich@mail.ru
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Preschool and Primary Education
33 Moskovskiy Prospekt, Vitebsk, 210038, Republic of BelarusReferences
- Buevich, A.A. (2014). Religious concept of “salvation” in Russian culture (based on the material of religious, philosophical and artistic discourses). Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics, (2), 45–62. (In Russ.)
- Buevich, A.A. (2017). The linguistic personality of the writer-theologian (of K.E. Skurat). Slavic values in the communicative space of regions. Minsk: Entsiklopedis Publ. (In Russ.)
- Bugaeva, I.V. (2010). The language of the Orthodox sphere: The current state, trends of development (Doctoral dissertation, Moscow). (In Russ.)
- Evdokimov, P.N. (2003). Stages of spiritual life: From the desert fathers to the present day. Moscow: Svyato-Filaretovsky Institute Publ. (In Russ.)
- Florensky, P. (1990). Works. Vol. 2. At the watersheds of thought. Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russ.)
- Gadomsky, A.K. (2005). Teolinguistics: The history of the question. Philology, (1), 16–26. Simferopol: TNU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Gadomsky, A.K. (2008). Reflections on the religious picture of the world. Ethnolinguistics (pp. 175–181). Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. (In Russ.)
- Geronimus, A. prot. (2005). Identity and difference in theology, philosophy and science. Christianity and Science: Collection of Reports. (pp. 106–152). Moscow: Department of Religious Education and Catechization of the Russian Orthodox Church Publ. (In Russ.)
- Heidegger, M. (1993). Time and being: Articles and speeches. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russ.)
- Humboldt, V. fon. (1985). Language and philosophy of culture. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)
- Humboldt, V. fon. (2000). Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)
- Irzabekov, V. (2007). The secret of the Russian word. Notes of a non-Russian person. Moscow: Danilov Monastery Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kant, I. (1965). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Moscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russ.)
- Koreneva, Y.V. (2019). Semantic volume of the word conviction in the Words and Homilies of the Russian saints of the 20th century. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics,10(3), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-3-665-672 (In Russ.)
- Losev, A.F. (1993). Personality and absolute. Moscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russ.)
- Postovalova, V.I. (2003). Religion, science and philosophy in the concept of integral knowledge of A.F. Losev. Christianity and Science: Collection of Reports (pp. 114–166). Moscow: Department of Religious Education and Catechesis of the Russian Orthodox Church. (In Russ.)
- Postovalova, V.I. (2011). Religious concepts in the theolinguistic view. Readers of Theolinguistics. Belgrade: Belgrade University. (In Russ.)
- Scheler, M. (1994). Selected works. Moscow: Gnosis Publ. (In Russ.)
- Schopenhauer, A. (1992). Selected works. Moscow: Prosvescheniye Publ. (In Russ.)
- Shaklein, V.M. (2010). Linguocultural situation in modern Russia. Moscow: Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
- Shaklein, V.M. (2012). History of the linguistic and cultural text. Moscow: RUDN University. (In Russ.)
- Shpet, G.G. (1999). Inner form of the word: Etudes and variations on themes of Humboldt. Ivanovo. (In Russ.)
- Sophronius (Sakharov), archimandrite. (1991). About prayer. Paris: YmcaPress. (In Russ.)
- Troitsky, V.Yu. (2001). Spirituality of the word. Word in philological education and upbringing. Moscow: ITRK Publ. (In Russ.)
- Vereshchagin, E.M. (2007). Russian language and Russian Orthodoxy: General philological problems. XI Kongress of MAPRYAL. Moscow: V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
