Public law regulation of biomedical technologies: the Norwegian experience

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

A comparative study of the legal regulation of biomedical technologies is conducted. The purpose of the study is to conduct a legal examination of the Norwegian experience, which is an example of a conservative approach based on the most careful permission for innovation in such a sensitive area. The main provisions of the Law of December 5, 2003, No. 100 “On the Medical Use of Biotechnology, etc. (Biotechnology Law)” are analyzed in detail. This law is based on the observance of universal principles in biomedicine – respect for human dignity, observance of human rights and personal inviolability, non-discrimination on the basis of heredity, promotion of the principles of bioethics. The main restrictions imposed on medical workers when implementing assisted reproductive technologies are shown. For example, Norway is a country where surrogacy is prohibited, and the birth of children using assisted reproduction is possible only after a thorough examination of the couple for the possibility of raising a child in appropriate conditions. Special requirements are presented for obtaining consent for the use of various biological objects (tissues, human cells, aborted material) for research purposes. It is highlighted that special legislation is in force that determines the legal regime of biobanks. It is concluded that the presence of strict rules correlates with the level of high trust in the public health system.

About the authors

Georgy B. ROMANOVSKY

Penza State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vlad93@Sura.Ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0546-2557
Scopus Author ID: 57191983029
ResearcherId: S-7012-2016

Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of “Criminal Law” Department

Russian Federation, 40 Krasnaya St., Penza, 440026, Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. ROMANOVSKAYA

Penza State University

Email: up406@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3040-083X

Research Engineer of “Criminal Law” Department

Russian Federation, 40 Krasnaya St., Penza, 440026, Russian Federation

Anastasia I. DASAEVA

Penza State University

Email: nastya.dasaewa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-6314-1297

Research Engineer of “Criminal Law” Department

Russian Federation, 40 Krasnaya St., Penza, 440026, Russian Federation

References

  1. Brunner H.G., Nelen M., Breakefield X.O., Ropers H.H., van Oost B.A. (1993). Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A // Science, vol. 262, no. 5133, pp. 578-580. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8211186
  2. McDermott R., Tingley D., Cowden J., Frazzetto G., Johnson D.D.P. (2009). Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 2118-2123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808376106
  3. Bhoi S., Sarangi P., Pradhan L.K., Sahoo P.K., Sahoo B.S., Aparna S., Raut S., Das S.K. (2024). Bisphenol F-induced precocious genesis of aggressive neurobehavioral response is associated with heightened monoamine oxidase activity and neurodegeneration in zebrafish brain. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 106, art. 107402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2024.107402
  4. Zoricheva A.S., Zvonova E.A., Agapova L.S., Lykova M.S., Markova O.A., Leonov V.S. (2024). Experience in the production and clinical application of the cell-based medicinal product Easytense® for the repair of cartilage defects of the human knee. BIOpreparaty. Profilaktika, diagnostika, lechenie = Biological Products. Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 172-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996X-2024-24-2-172-187, https://elibrary.ru/oosrku
  5. Sundby J. (2010). Infertility in public health: the case of Norway. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 177-181.
  6. Romanovskaya O.V. (2014). Genetic counseling in family law. Grazhdanin i pravo, no. 12, pp. 71-80. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tctfvx
  7. Goisis A., Håberg S.E., Hanevik H.I., Magnus M.C., Kravdal Ø. (2020). The demographics of assisted reproductive technology births in a Nordic country. Human Reproduction, no. 35 (6), pp. 1441-1450. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa055
  8. Johannessen J., Nærland T., Hope S., Torske T., Høyland A.L., Strohmaier J., Heiberg A., Rietschel M., Djurovic S., Andreassen Ole A., Butler Merlin G. (2017). Parents’ attitudes toward clinical genetic testing for autism spectrum disorder – data from a Norwegian sample. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 5, art. 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051078
  9. Von Krogh A.S., Waage A., Quist-Paulsen P. (2016). Kongenital trombotisk trombocytopenisk purpura. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen, no. 136, pp. 1452-1457. (In Swedish) https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.15.1272
  10. Prescott T. (2016). Skal friske barn testes for genetisk sykdomsdisposisjon? Tidsskr Nor Legeforen, no. 136, p. 1421. (In Nor.)
  11. Bondarya N.S. (academ. ed.). (2021). Economic Law. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 352 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31085/9785392336791-2021-352, https://elibrary.ru/iymonq

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 ROMANOVSKY G.B., ROMANOVSKAYA E.A., DASAEVA A.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).