The Problem of the Relationship between Predestination and Freedom of Choice in the Historical and Philosophical Context
- Authors: Nadeina D.A.1, Nadeina D.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg State University
- Researcher
- Issue: Vol 9, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 78-102
- Section: Статьи
- Published: 31.03.2025
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2576-9782/article/view/301330
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2576-9782-2025-9-1-270
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XDCJDO
- ID: 301330
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The subject of the research in this article is one of the most fundamental worldview problems - the question of the relationship between free will and predestination in the religious and philosophical context. As a result of a scrupulous analysis of both the sources and the state of modern scientific knowledge, the authors established the insolubility of this problem within the framework of being, which has three reasons: rigid determinism excludes freedom; foresight without predestination leads to the absurdity of the innumerability of alternative worlds; conditional freedom as a conscious necessity leads to the collapse of providence through the wrong choices of "unconscious" refusers of necessity.
Research methods. The authors rely on the method of analogies, using systemic and interdisciplinary approaches, conceptual and phenomenological analysis, as well as the use of natural philosophical approaches based on modern discoveries of natural science, intuitive analysis of the Incomprehensible.
Results. The authors come to the conclusion that the concept of hard determinism as applied to the observable universe is preferable in comparison with all other philosophical concepts of the relationship between freedom and predetermination within the framework of the existence of the world. At the same time, the authors offer their own concept of the implementation of Man's free will under conditions of complete predetermination through the change of Providence by God, who is forced to "process theism" in himself and in the world at the request of his "born-from-above" children for those who are dear to them in the existence of the world. Conclusions: The children of God born from above, being in the Super-existence of God, themselves command the Father, who changes Providence at their request: "your will be done"; in the world of existence, God is present and acts only in the minds of those who believe in Him and nowhere else and in no way - this is how the aporia of transcendence is resolved. By changing Providence, God changes himself and improves in his perfection, learning the best in Man.
Conclusion. In the proposed concept, God, the world and man create a dynamic system of mutual influence, in which freedom and predestination coexist, finding their place in the general ontological structure.
About the authors
Dar'ya A. Nadeina
St. Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Bogoslovblog@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-6063-8171
applicant
Russian Federation, 5, Mendeleevskaya line, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian FederationDar'ya A. Nadeina
Researcher
Email: ochek@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-4393-1445
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD, Latvia)
Russian FederationReferences
- Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated from the Greek by P. D. Pervov and V. V. Rozanov. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Theology and History of St. Thomas, 2006, p. 232.
- Bergson A. Creative Evolution. Matter and Memory. Mn.: Harvest, 1999, 1408 p.
- Boethius. Consolation by Philosophy and other treatises. M: Nauka Publ., 1990, 413 p.
- Valverde Carlos. Philosophical Anthropology. Moscow: Christian Russia, 2000, 411 p.
- Wentzel van Huyssteen. Theological determinism. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion / J. Wentzel Vrede van Huyssteen, editor in chief. Macmillan Reference, 2003. Vol. 1. P. 217.
- Hobbes T. Chapter XXI. On the liberty of subjects. Works: in 2 vol. Vol. 2. М.: Mysl, 1991, p. 164.
- David Hume. Philosophical Heritage. Works: In 2 vol. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1996.
- St. Justin the Philosopher and Martyr: Works. Reprint. M.: Pilgrim; Blagovest: 1995, 484 p.
- Losev A. F. Parmenides. Dialectics of one and the other as a condition for the possibility of the existence of a generating model. Plato. Collected Works in 4 vol. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1993, pp. 497-504.
- Chekrygin O.V., Nadeina D.A., Mezentsev I.V. Problematics of the Neoplatonic Disclosure of the Hypotheses of “Parmenides” and the Solution of the “Aporia of Transcendence”. Philosophical Thought, 2024, no. 12, pp. 161-174. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2024.12.72346
- Chekrygin O.V., Nadeina D.A., Mezentsev I.V. Experience of the procedural interpretation of the absolute on the basis of the teachings of Jesus. Philosophical Thought, 2024, no. 12, pp. 139-160. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2024.12.72508
- Chekrygin O.V., Mezentsev I.V., Nadeina D.A. Critique of the logic of hypotheses of the dialog “Parmenides” and the formation of a new ontological perspective. Theology: theory and practice, 2024, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 79-95. https://doi.org/10.24412/2949-3951-2024-0050
- Month S.V. Neoplatonism. Orthodox Encyclopedia. Moscow: CNTs “Orthodox Encyclopedia”, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 657-672.
- Plato. The State. M: Academic Project, 2015, 398 p.
- Plotinus. Treatises. Moscow: Graeco-Latin Study of Y. A. Shichalin, 2007, 444 p.
- Spinoza B. A Brief Treatise on God, Man and His Happiness. Collected Works, 1957, vol. 1, p. 630.
- Hawking S. Black Holes and Young Universes. SPb.: Amfora, 2001, 187 p.
- Nadeina D.A., Chekrygin O.V. Problem of predetermination and freedom in the historical and philosophical context. Vestnik nauki, 2025, no. 2 (83), vol. 1, pp. 903-925. https://www.вестник-науки.рф/article/21326
- Schopenhauer A. Collected Works: in 6 vol. Т. 3: Small Philosophical Works. M.: TERRA-Book Club; Respublika, 2001, 528 p.
- Erasmus of Rotherdam. Diatribe or Discourse on Freedom of the Will. Philosophical Works. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 216-290.
- Bonner Geral. Augustine and the Bible. Paris: Notre Dame Press, 1999, 370 p.
- A. Pablo Iannone. Dictionary of World Philosophy. Taylor & Francis, 2001, p. 194.
- Purinton J.S. Epicurus on “Free Volition” and the Atomic Swerve. Phronesis, 1999, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 253-299.
- Sharples R.W. Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. Routledge, 1996, 172 p.
- Sorabji R. Necessity, Cause, and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory. London: Duckworth & Co, 1980, p. 243.
Supplementary files
