Regional Models of Legal Regulation of Data Protection in the EU and APEC Countries

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article analyzes the models of legal regulation of personal data protection that have developed in the EU and the countries of the Asia–Pacific region. The subject of the study is a comparative legal analysis of the theoretical and practical aspects of personal data protection in the EU and APEC countries. The conclusion is made about a narrower concept of «privacy protection» in relation to «data protection», which includes other basic rights and freedoms of citizens and all types of data, regardless of their relationship to the sphere of private life. Based on a comparative analysis of the main acts in the field of personal data protection in force in the EU and APEC countries (GDPR and CBPR), the main difference in the purpose of legal regulation is highlighted: in GDPR, this is the protection of users and the establishment of their control over personal data, and in CBPR—the development of economic turnover, in particular, electronic commerce. Additional differences in the models of legal regulation of data protection in the EU and APEC countries on the subject of application, methods of data transmission, and the field of personal data are considered.

作者简介

Ekaterina Sviridova

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ESviridova@fa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7791-0550
SPIN 代码: 9514-6466

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of legal regulation of economic activity

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Bartsits V.I. Development of the European Union Legislation in the Field of Personal Data Protection. Bulletin of the Law Faculty, SFEDU. 2022. Vol. 9, №2. P. 150–164.
  2. Nefedov B.I., Istomin N.A. Features of the development of intersystem legal formations designed to regulate personal data protection during cross-border transfer. The Russian Juridical Journal. 2021. №2. Р. 164–181.
  3. Cavoukian A. Privacy by Design: Leadership, Methods and Results. European Data Protection: Coming of Age. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2013. Р. 175–202.
  4. Favro K. La démarche de compliance ou la mise en œuvre d’une approche inversée. LEGICOM, 2017. 59 (2):21-28.
  5. Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n° 171—Protezione delle persone fisiche con riguardo al trattamento di dati personali [Электронный ресурс] URL: Legge 21 dicembre 2018 n.171—Protezione delle persone fisiche con riguardo al trattamento di dati personal—Consiglio Grande e Generale (дата обращения: 12.04.2023).
  6. Simitis S. Établissement de structures institutionnelles pour le contrôle et la mise en place de la protection des données. Questions d’ordre politique soulevées par la protection des données et des libertés individuelles, principes et perspectives. Compte-rendu du séminaire, Paris, Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economique (OCDE) (Collection études d’informatique), 1974. Р. 96–109.
  7. Zuiderveen Borgesius F. The Breyer Case of the Court of Justice of the European Union: IP Addresses and the Personal Data Definition. European Data Protection Law Review, 2017. 3(1):130-137.


##common.cookie##