Corporate training of employees in companies of the European Union: can we talk about the formation of a European model of a corporate university?

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the main features of European corporate universities and to determine their difference from similar structural units that provide the practice of corporate training in the United States of America. In the presented work, the issues reflecting the attitude of the top management of commercial companies of the European Union to personnel policy in general and the formation of intra-company training systems are considered. Taking into account the relevance of the practice of human resource management, the organization of corporate knowledge systems and training, a review of publications reflecting the practice of human capital development has been conducted. The presented review links HR policy with the phenomenon of corporate universities, since they are institutionalized in the corporate organizational system and are conceived as a means of increasing the ability of companies to respond to organizational and technological changes. Thus, an attempt is made to conclude about the possible emergence of a European model of corporate educational practice, different from the practice of corporate training in the United States of America, which is considered the birthplace of in-house training. Conclusions. Currently, investments in training are not limited to specific skills, as in the traditional view of human capital. There is a close connection between personnel policy and the phenomenon of a corporate university, since it is based on the complementarity of personnel practices, which is also influenced by the institutional framework. Despite the fact that over the past two decades European companies have created their own corporate universities, it is not yet possible to talk about a single European model of a corporate university.

Sobre autores

Polina Ananchenkova

Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Department of Healthcare of the City of Moscow

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ananchenkova@yandex.ru
Código SPIN: 1040-5763

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management in Healthcare

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Mescon M., Albert M., Hedouri F. Fundamentals of Management. —M., 1997.
  2. Ansoff I. New corporate strategy. —St. Petersburg, 1999.
  3. Hofstede G.H. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. —N.-Y., 1997.
  4. Thompson A., Strickland A.J. Strategic Management. Concepts and situations for analysis. —M., 2007.
  5. Akoff R.L. Planning the future of the corporation. —M., 1985.
  6. Erokhina E. A. Formation of a system of continuous professional education of personnel in organizations: dis. candidate of Economic Sciences. —Moscow, 2005.
  7. Belogurov A. Yu., Marushina M. K. Classification of corporate executive training programs and clusters of competencies developed in them. KANT. —2020. № 2 (35) —Pp. 189–195.
  8. Galaguzov A. N. Corporate education: essence and problems. Siberian Pedagogical Journal. —2007. —No. 1. —pp. 89–97.
  9. Gracheva S. Corporate universities abroad (history of creation, experience, modernity. Personnel management. —2008. —№ 5.
  10. Dolzhenko R. A. Corporate training system: content, place in the education system and main approaches to implementation in the company. Pedagogical education in Russia. —2017. —No. 3. —pp. 6–13.
  11. Klarin M. V. Corporate education and training in organizations: goals and features. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. «Education. Personality. Society» —2016. —Issue 1. —Pp. 6–16.
  12. Council of the European Union. Joint Progress Report of the Council and the Commission on the implementation of the «Education & Training 2020» work program. Brussels 18th January 2020.
  13. IBM. The Global Human Capital Study. New York. 2018.
  14. Coriat B., Dosi G. Learning how to govern and how to solve problems: on the co-evolution of competences, conflicts and organisational routines. Oxford Univerisity Press. Oxford. —2018.
  15. Unioncamere: La domanda di professioni e formazione nel 2019. Progetto Excelsior. Roma. 2019.
  16. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 5231.
  17. Pedrini G. Personnel policies in the European firms: some evidence of the existing model(s) and the potential role of Corporate Universities. University of Bologna. Almalaurea working papers. —2021. —№22.
  18. Allen M. The Corporate University handbook—Designing, managing and growing a successful program. AMACOM. New York. 2022.
  19. Moore J. D. Running a corporate university like a business: a financial model. New York. 2002.
  20. Hilse H., Nicolai A.T. Strategic learning in Germany’s largest companies. Empirical evidence on the role of Corporate Universities within strategy process. The Journal of Management Development. —2022. —23(3-4). —Pp. 372–397.
  21. Renaud-Coulon A. Corporate universities: A lever of corporate responsibility. Global CCU Publishing. Paris. 2020.
  22. Arkin A. Combined Honours. People Management. —12th October 2020. —Pp. 43–46.
  23. Jansink F., Kwakman K., Streumer J. The knowledge-productive corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training. —2015. —29(1). —Pp. 40–57.


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies