Legal regulation of state protection of poor citizens in certain foreign countries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Purpose of the study. The purpose of writing a scientific work is to study the foreign experience of legal regulation of the state protection of poor citizens in certain foreign countries. This topic, although it has received some development in the pages of legal literature, however, has not been comprehensively studied. The paper analyzes the norms in the field of social protection of such countries as Sweden, Great Britain, Germany, France, Denmark, China, Japan, South Korea. Conclusions. Exploring the legal basis for the state protection of poor citizens in certain foreign countries, it was stated that at the moment the leaders in the implementation of social policy are certain European countries, as well as South Korea, Japan and some other countries. Each of them has developed its own social security system, regulated by basic regulatory legal acts.

About the authors

Maksim V. Demchenko

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: MVDemchenko@fa.ru
Scopus Author ID: 57200194746
ResearcherId: X-3664-2018

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Dean, Faculty of Law on scientific work

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Antropov V.V. Swedish experience of social security // Modern Europe. 2007. No. 1(29). pp. 78–86.
  2. Batyrshina E.I. Standard of living in Sweden // Economics and management of innovative technologies. 2019. No. 6 (93). P. 9.
  3. Voronina K.A., Huseynova S.E. Financial support for the social policy of the Federal Republic of Germany // Alley of Science. 2020. Vol. 1. No. 3 (42). pp. 714–724.
  4. Voronkov K.I., Ilizabaliza Zh.K. Resocialization of citizens in the context of the social policy of modern France // Legality and the rule of law. 2020. No. 2 (26). pp. 99–101.
  5. Ivanova S.N. On Foreign and Russian Social Policy: Approaches and Solutions // Economics and Management: Scientific and Practical Journal. 2020. No. 2 (152). pp. 124–128.
  6. Kuravleva Y.S. Experience in organizing social protection of citizens in Sweden // Scientific space: topical issues, achievements and innovations: a collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the XVII MNPK, Anapa, April 18, 2020. pp. 64–68.
  7. Kiselev D.N., Feraru G.S. On the need to introduce a cluster-network model for organizing socio-economic space at the regional level // Economic Research and Development, 2020. No. 1. pp. 76–87.
  8. Mamieva D.G. Feature of social work in the Scandinavian countries // Modern studies of social problems, 2017. Volume 8. No. 12. pp. 79–92.
  9. Podolsky V.A. Social state in Great Britain: formation and functioning // Public administration. Electronic Bulletin. Issue No. 90. February 2022, pp. 183–197.
  10. Sturua V.G. Social protection of the population in Sweden // The best research project 2021: a collection of articles of the II MNIK, Petrozavodsk, November 29, 2021. pp. 149–155.
  11. Tuarmensky V.V., Firsova D.N. Social policy of the Nordic countries // Innovative economy: prospects for development and improvement. 2019. No. 2 (36). pp. 86–96.
  12. Ahlén, Anton & Palme, Joakim. Migrants’ Access to Social Protection in Sweden // In book: Migration and Social Protection in Europe and Beyond (Volume 1), Comparing Access to Welfare Entitlements. October 2020. LicenseCC BY 4.0 (pp.421–435).
  13. Berthold N., Stettes O. Die betriebliche Mittbestimmung in Deutschland—eine richtige Reform in die falsche Richtung. 2006.
  14. Carrol А.В. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct // Business & society, 2005.
  15. Deeming C. The United Kingdom New Devolved Welfare Systems in Britain. In: Blum S., Kuhlmann J., Schubert K. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of European Welfare Systems. Oxon: Routledge, 2020. P. 531 (522–543).
  16. Erhard L. Gedanken aus fünf Jahrzehnten.—Düsseldorf: Econ, 1988, p. 480.
  17. Hayashi, M., «Social Protection in Japan: Current State and Challenges», in Asher, M. G., S. Oum and F. Parulian (eds.), Social Protection in East Asia—Current State and Challenges. ERIA Research Project Report 2009-9, Jakarta: ERIA, 2010. pp. 19–54.
  18. Hood A., Norris Keiller A. A Survey of the UK Benefit System. London: IFS, 2016. Р. 60.
  19. Heclo H., Madsen H. Poliсy and politics in Sweden, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1987. —P. 154.
  20. Juwei, Z. «Social Protection in China: Current Status and Challenges», in Asher, M. G., S. Oum and F. Parulian (eds.), Social Protection in East Asia—Current State and Challenges. ERIA Research Project Report 2009-9, Jakarta: ERIA., 2010. pp. 371–398.
  21. Jones B. Dictionary of British Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004.
  22. Khaled, M., Park Hunghee’s Industrialization Policy and its Lessons for Developing Countries. In: World Congress for Korean Studies 2007on line. Nurimary: Bexco in Busan.
  23. Lee, Sunju. Social Security System of South Korea // semantic cscholar. 2015.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies