🔧На сайте запланированы технические работы
25.12.2025 в промежутке с 18:00 до 21:00 по Московскому времени (GMT+3) на сайте будут проводиться плановые технические работы. Возможны перебои с доступом к сайту. Приносим извинения за временные неудобства. Благодарим за понимание!
🔧Site maintenance is scheduled.
Scheduled maintenance will be performed on the site from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM Moscow time (GMT+3) on December 25, 2025. Site access may be interrupted. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you for your understanding!

 

(De)Motivating factors of e-mentoring integration in English academic writing classrooms


Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

It remains unquestionable that learning a language such as English through online mode may have transformative impacts on students’ motivational process. Grounded from the rationale, this study explored EFL students’ (de)motivating factors in integrating e-mentoring methods during academic writing projects. Thirteen selected university students with different demographic variables (i.e., grade, gender, university, age, language proficiency) attended multiple interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observation as data collection methods. The data were analysed through the integration of IDEEAS framework, consisting of Inclusion, Design, Engagement, Evaluation, Assessment, and Support phases and a descriptive statistical analysis. The findings are twofold. First, e-mentoring motivated EFL students to engage with academic paper writing as it effectively reduced cultural and linguistic barriers (i.e., through online tutorials, games, or discussion), promoted always-on communication (i.e., through synchronous and asynchronous modes), and relied on process rather than product (i.e., through dialogic syllabus). Nevertheless, e-mentoring remained demotivating for the students as it concerned with verbalised communication, threatened face-to-face interaction, and caused them to rely on online culture. This study implies that university stakeholders, mentors, or supervisors have to integrate e-mentoring into English learning curriculum and facilitate online learning procedures systematically. In short, motivating and demotivating factors in e-mentoring process remain critical as academic paper writing cannot be successfully engaged with online meeting. The e-mentor has to implement particular strategies by intensively utilising online apps to increase effective communication and overcome drawbacks during the academic writing project.

Об авторах

Heri Mudra

Email: herimudra4@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3712-2701

Список литературы

  1. Addae, D., Abakah, E., & Amuzu, D. (2025). Adults who learn online: Exploring the online learning readiness of nontraditional undergraduate students in a Ghanaian university. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, Article 100407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100407
  2. Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015
  3. Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2021). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 380-400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131
  4. Alemdag, E., & Erdem, M. (2017). Designing an e-mentoring program for novice teachers in Turkey and investigating online interactions and program outcomes. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 123-150.
  5. Alhadlaq, A., Kharrufa, A., & Olivier, P. (2019). Exploring e-mentoring: Co-designing & un-platforming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1122-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1571110
  6. Alzubi, A. A. F., & Nazim, M. (2024). Students’ intrinsic motivation in EFL academic writing: Topic-based interest in focus. Heliyon, 10(1), Article e24169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24169
  7. Arnold, K. D., Deutschlander, D. T., & Lewis, J. S. (2022). Someone on my side: The experiences of high-achieving, underserved high school students in an e-mentoring college access intervention. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(4), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2091193
  8. Aslan, A. (2021). Problem-based learning in live online classes: Learning achievement, problem-solving skill, communication skill, and interaction. Computers & Education, 171, Article 104237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104237
  9. Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
  10. Bingham A. J., & Witkowsky, P. (2022). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In C. Vanover, P. Mihas, & J. Saldaña (Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133-146). Sage Publications.
  11. Bishop, S. C. (2021). ‘What does a torture survivor look like?’ Nonverbal communication in US asylum interviews and hearings. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(2), 185-203.
  12. Can, Ş., Durgun, H., & Dalcalı, B. K. (2022). Effect of online communication skills training on effective communication and self-efficacy and self-regulated learning skills of nursing students: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, Article 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103371
  13. Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback in a computer-assisted environment: EFL learners’ linguistic performance and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2315070
  14. Cicchinelli, A., & Pammer-Schindler, V. (2021). What makes volunteer mentors tick? A case study in a preparatory online training course. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(3), 256-276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-12-2020-0191
  15. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343
  16. Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.) Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315833750
  17. Ebrahimi, M. (2022). Ubiquitous learning: The effect of LingAR application on EFL learners’ language achievement and the realization of their motivation towards mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2041044
  18. Foung, D., Lin, L., & Chen, J. (2024). Reinventing assessments with ChatGPT and other online tools: Opportunities for GenAI-empowered assessment practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100250
  19. Gafni-Lachter, L., Niemeyer, L., Doyle, N., Norcross, J., & Jacobs, K. (2021). Equal peer e-mentoring for online graduate students: A case study and mediation model. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(5), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1986799
  20. Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
  21. Giray, L., Sevnarayan, K., & Ranjbaran Madiseh, F. (2025). Beyond policing: AI writing detection tools, trust, academic integrity, and their implications for college writing. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(1), 83-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2437174
  22. Guo, Q., Yang, B., Xiao, L., & Xie, C. (2024). Foreign language learning and the development of global competence in different cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 101, Article 102013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102013
  23. Guo, W., Bai, B., & Song, H. (2021). Influences of process-based instruction on students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies in EFL writing. System, 101, Article 102578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102578
  24. Han, R., Alibakhshi, G., Lu, L., & Labbafi, A. (2024). Digital communication activities and EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and engagement: Exploring the intermediate language learners’ perceptions. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e25213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25213
  25. Hardt, D., Nagler, M., & Rincke, J. (2022). Can peer mentoring improve online teaching effectiveness? An RCT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Labour Economics, 78, Article 102220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102220
  26. Hsiao, J. C., & Chang, J. S. (2023). Enhancing EFL reading and writing through AI-powered tools: Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online course. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 4934-4949. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207187
  27. Hsu, H. C. (2022). Peer interaction and attention to form in web-based synchronous and asynchronous L2 collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1602-1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2095405
  28. Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2016). Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
  29. Ji, X., & Zhang, A. J. (2025). Demotivation in English learning of Chinese medical students: Insights from situated expectancy-value theory. Acta Psychologica, 253, Article 104716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104716
  30. Karaca, M., & Inan, S. (2020). A measure of possible sources of demotivation in L2 writing: A scale development and validation study. Assessing Writing, 43, Article 100438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100438
  31. Kaçar, I. G., & Baltacı, H. Ş. (2023). Designing a complementary e-mentoring program for pre-service ELT teachers: Online co-mentoring project. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 31(3), 352-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2202473
  32. Kaufman, M. R., Zhou, X., Yenokyan, G., Levine, D. K., Wright, K., Salcido, M., … Palen, L. A. (2024). Exploring organizational digital readiness to offer youth E-Mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 32(4), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2024.2349013
  33. Kumar, S., Roumell, E. A., & Bolliger, D. U. (2023). Faculty perceptions of e-mentoring doctoral dissertations: Challenges, strategies, and institutional support. American Journal of Distance Education, 39(2), 128–1. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2023.2213137
  34. Lacombe, C., Elalouf, K., & Collin, C. (2024). Impact of social anxiety on communication skills in face-to-face vs. online contexts. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, Article 100458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100458
  35. Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2022). Higher education leaders’ perspectives of accessible and inclusive online learning. Distance Education, 43(4), 574-595.
  36. Lyu, W., & Salam, Z. A. (2025). AI-powered personalized learning: Enhancing self-efficacy, motivation, and digital literacy in adult education through expectancy-value theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, Article 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102129
  37. Martin, F., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2023). IDEAS framework for teaching online. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/4/ideas-framework-for-teaching-online
  38. Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
  39. Mohammed, M. A. S., & AL-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Google Docs or Microsoft Word? Master’s students’ engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition, 62, Article 102672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102672
  40. Mullen, C. A. (2023). Guiding online students in a crisis: An intervention for mentoring educational leadership doctoral candidates. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 18(3), 510-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751221097147
  41. Osiyanova, O. M, Burikova, S. A., & Radyuk, A. V. (2024). Technology for improving students’ communicative skills in the university digital educational environment. Training, Language and Culture, 8(4), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-4-24-35
  42. Oyedemi, T., & Kgasago, T. J. (2017). Always-available communication and technological distractions: Technology use, texting and driving. Communicatio, 43(3-4), 36-53.
  43. Phyo, W. M., Nikolov, M., & Hódi, Á. (2024). What support do international doctoral students claim they need to improve their academic writing in English? Ampersand, 12, Article 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100161
  44. Rahimi, M. (2024). Effects of integrating motivational instructional strategies into a process-genre writing instructional approach on students’ engagement and argumentative writing. System, 121, Article 103261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103261
  45. Reid, E., & Ivenz, P. (2025). Planning and evaluation of an adapted online intercultural communication course for undergraduate English language students. Evaluation and Program Planning, 111, Article 102599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102599
  46. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  47. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  48. Sakai, H., & Kikuchi, K. (2009). An analysis of demotivators in the EFL classroom. System, 37, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.09.005
  49. Stošić, L., & Guillén-Gámez, F. D. (2024). The potential of it tools in foreign language acquisition: A comprehensive assessment. Training, Language and Culture, 8(4), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-4-95-108
  50. Shin, J. Y., Dixon, L. Q., & Choi, Y. (2019). An updated review on use of L1 in foreign language classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(5), 406-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1684928
  51. Suleyeva, K., Tovma, N., & Zakirova, O. (2021). Developing emotional intelligence in elementary school children in Russia: Verbal and non-verbal communication. Education 3-13, 50(8), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1934060
  52. Tabari, M. A., & Johnson, M. D. (2025). Rethinking fluency in task-based L2 writing: A critical examination of product- and process-based measures. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225
  53. Townsend, J. (2025). Kuroko workflows: Process over product in translingual reading and writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 76, Article 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101536
  54. Trinh, A.-H., & Dinh, H. (2024). Language and home-culture integrated online learning curriculum for developing intercultural communicative competence. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(12), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-09-2023-0097
  55. Underman, K., Kochunilathil, M., McLean, L., & Vinson, A. H. (2022). Online student culture as site for negotiating assessment in medical education. Social Science & Medicine, 310, Article 115270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115270
  56. Uştuk, Ö., & Aydın, S. (2016). The effects of the use of paralinguistic cues on foreign language anxiety among English as a foreign language speakers. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1211133
  57. Vaghjee, G., & Vaghjee, H. (2022). Participatory learning culture: From spectators to creators in online learning environments. In U. G. Singh, C. S. Nair, C. Blewett, & T. Shea (Eds.), Academic voices: A conversation on new approaches to teaching and learning in the post-COVID world (pp. 101–113). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91185-6.00003-3
  58. Wang, Q., Ji, Z., Li, J., & Pang, Y. (2023). Mutual mentor: Online contrastive distillation network for general continual learning. Neurocomputing, 537, 37-48.
  59. Wang, J., Liardét, C., & Lum, J. (2024). Feeling like an academic writer: an exploration of doctoral students’ struggle for recognition. Studies in Continuing Education, 47(1), 285-301.
  60. Wang, W., & Wu, Y. (2025). EFL learner motivation and psychological well-being in online instruction: To spy the traces of resilience, autonomy, and engagement via path analysis. Learning and Motivation, 89, Article 102078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102078
  61. Wang, R., & Zhang, H. (2025). Integrating positive psychology principles in vocational education: A new approach to boosting student well-being and academic motivation. Acta Psychologica, 254, Article 104834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104834
  62. Wright, K., Levine, D. K., Salcido, M., Garringer, M., Almendra, T., Bazell, A., & Kaufman, M. R. (2024). From crisis to capacity: Lessons learned from youth e-mentoring during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, Article 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100400
  63. Wu, Z. (2020). Tracing EFL writers’ digital literacy practices in asynchronous communication: A multiple-case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, Article 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100754
  64. Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: The use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387.
  65. Xie, Q., & Cui, Y. (2021). Preservice teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in English writing class: Mentoring matters. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101019
  66. Zalazar, M. L. (2025). Digital multimodal composing versus traditional monomodal writing: A look at the Spanish imperfect subjunctive from a process and product perspective. System, 132, Article 103718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103718

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML

© Training, Language and Culture, 2025

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».