Students Readiness to Design Their Own Educational Trajectory at the University

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of students’ readiness to consciously choose the elements of their individual curriculum, and educational trajectory. The authors present the results of a survey of undergraduate students of the Institute of Linguistic and Pedagogical Education (LPE) of the National Research University (MIET), conducted in order to determine whether students are ready to act as autonomous co-authors of their own educational trajectories and curricula. The analysis of the results shows that not all students cope with the performance of these functions, and there is a need for systemic formation of students’ ability to make conscious choice of the target, content, and technological aspects of their education.

About the authors

Mary Georgievna Evdokimova

National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET), Moscow

Author for correspondence.
Email: me49@mail.ru

Doctor of Pedagogy (Dr. habil), Associate Professor, Director of Institute of Linguistic and Pedagogical Education, National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET)

Russian Federation

Natalia Leonidovna Baydikova

National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET), Moscow

Email: nataleon22@list.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Institute of Linguistic and Pedagogical Education, National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET)

Russian Federation

Elena Sergeevna Davidenko

National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET), Moscow

Email: des_kr@mail.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Institute of Linguistic and Pedagogical Education, National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET) 

Russian Federation

References

  1. Iansiti M. Real world R&D: Jumping the product generation gap // Harvard Business Review. 1993. May-June. P. 138–147. URL: https://hbr.org/1993/05/real-world-rd-jumping-the-product-generation-gap
  2. Succeeding through service innovation: A service perspective for education, research, business and government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing (IfM) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). 2008. URL: https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Resources/080428cambridge_ssme_whitepaper.pdf
  3. Ramping for Campus T-Vitality and T-Success. T-ACADEMY. Michigan State University, 2018. URL: https://tsummit.org/t/
  4. Mulder F. Mass-individualization of higher education facilitated by the use of ICT // Conference DeLFI & GMW. Germany, Rostock. 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221273258_Mass-individualization_of_higher_education_facilitated_by_the_use_of_ICT
  5. Cullen R., Harris M., Hill R. Learner-Centered Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  6. Brooman S., Darwent S., Pimor A. The student voice in higher education curriculum design: is there value in listening? // Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2015. Vol. 52. №6. P. 663–674. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.910128.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).