Comparative regional studies as an indicator of the modification properties of the modern world
- Authors: Bobylev V.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Issue: No 4(861) (2025)
- Pages: 9-15
- Section: Политические науки
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2500-347X/article/view/369580
- ID: 369580
Cite item
Abstract
The modern world is faced with a problem: the more aggressive globalization is, the more urgent it is to solve problems of various local specifics. The essence of the modification of the world is that it involves territories that have been forming their own development imperative for centuries. The process of global regionalization has taken shape, which is considered as the regionalization of the system of international relations (hereinafter – MO). The changes actualize the appeal to the concepts: "region", "regionalization", "sovereignty", "quasi-state", "actors of the defense system", etc.; regional studies as a science. Regional studies is becoming a tool for understanding the world in terms of revealing its transformation. The problem of studying comparative regional studies, an indicator of global transit that determines the vector of the emerging structure of the world, is being formed. This refers to a new interpretation of the concept of "region", an attempt to create a new direction in the study of the regional level in the context of global changes. The purpose of the article is to identify the role of comparative regional studies as a method in assessing the transformational processes of our time. In accordance with this goal, such methods of scientific knowledge as the study, synthesis, analysis, and systematization of research papers reflecting aspects of international politics were used. Based on the theoretical experience gained, forecasting and modeling of the development of modern political processes are used. The method of comparative analysis, operating within the framework of civilizational and systemic approaches to cognition, seems to be decisive and significant, and its development and application opens up prospects for a more complete understanding of the content of the formation of the MO system. As a result of the research, the author came to the conclusion that the mechanism of regional development has a sustainable impact on the world; comparative regional studies allows us to determine the directions and priorities in this process. The results obtained confirm the predictions about the duration of the modern transition period and the identification of approaches to its understanding.
About the authors
Viktor Yuryevich Bobylev
Moscow State Linguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: tihon1999@gmail.com
PhD (History), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Regional Studies, Institute of International Relations and Social and Political Sciences
Russian FederationReferences
- Данилов А. Н. Современный многополярный мир – мир всечеловеческий, многоцивилизационный // Социологический альманах. 2021. № 12. С. 15–19.
- Ефремова К. Е. От регионализма к трансрегионализму: теоретическое осмысление новой реальности // Сравнительная политика. 2017. Т. 8. № 2. С. 58–72.
- Айзард У. Методы межрегионального и регионального анализа // Региональное развитие и сотрудничество. 1998. № 1–2. С. 62–63.
- Иванова М. В. Введение в регионоведение: учебное пособие. Томск: Изд-во ТПУ, 2008.
- Зиневич О. В., Рузанкина Е. А. Регионоведение как комплекс исследовательских и учебных дисциплин в ракурсе междисциплинарности. УМС по зарубежному регионоведению // Сравнительная политика. 2014. № 3 (17). С. 159–167.
- Междисциплинарность в науках и философии: коллективная монография / Касавин И. Т. [и др.] ; отв. ред. И. Т. Касавин. М.: Институт философии Российской академии наук, 2010.
- Лагутина М. Л., Михайленко Е. Б. Регионализм в глобальную эпоху: обзор зарубежных и российских подходов // Вестник РУДН. Международные отношения. 2020. Т. 20. № 2. С. 261–278.
- Елистратов В. С. Регионоведение: «ищите термин!» // Актуальные проблемы регионоведения: работы преподавателей факультета иностранных языков МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова. М.: МГУ, 2004. Вып. 1. С. 5–14.
- Михайленко Е. Б. Альтернативный регионализм БРИКС // Диспаритеты международных интеграционных проектов: сборник научных трудов. Уральский федеральный университет имени первого Президента России Б. Н. Ельцина. 2016. Т. 11. № 3 (155). С. 194–206.
- Laursen F. (Ed.). Comparative regional integration: Theoretical perspectives. Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.
- De Lombaerde P. et al. The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism / De P. Lombaerde, F. Söderbaum, Van L. Langenhove, F. Baert // Jean Monnet / Robert Schuman Paper Series. Vol. 9. No. 7. University of Miami, April 2009. P. 3–22.
- Warleigh-Lack A., Van Langenhove L. Rethinking EU Studies: The Contribution of Comparative Regionalism // Journal of European Integration. 2010. Vol. 32. № 6. P. 541–562.
- Acharya A. Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time Has Come? // International Spectator. 2012. Vol. 47. P. 3–15.
- Репина Л. П. Макроисторическая перспектива сегодня: теоретические и терминологические поиски // Преподаватель ХХI век. 2014. № 2. С. 243–258.
- Сил Р., Ахрам А.И. Сравнительное регионоведение и исследование Глобального Юга // Вестник РУДН Серия: Международные отношения. 2020. Т. 20. № 2. С. 279–287.
- Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
- Ragin C. C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
- Ragin C. C., Rihoux B. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. London: Sage, 2009.
- Almond G. A. Area studies and the objectivity of the social sciences // Ventures in political science: Narratives and reflections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002. P. 109–127.
- Szanton D. L. (ed.). The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
- Basedau M., Köllner P. Area studies, comparative area studies and the study of politics: Context, substance, and methodological challenges // Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. 2007. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 105–124.
- Карлбэк Х. Это было конструирование региона // Янтарный мост. Международный журнал. Аналитика и консалтинг. 2012. № 1(5). URL: http://abfund.org/ (дата обращения: 25.11.2025).
Supplementary files

