Efficacy mixture of fomesafen and clomazone for weed control in potato
- 作者: Tkach A.S.1, Golubev A.S.1, Dolzhenko V.I.1
-
隶属关系:
- All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection
- 期: 编号 4 (2024)
- 页面: 41-46
- 栏目: Crop production, plant protection and biotechnology
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2500-2627/article/view/267117
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500262724040081
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FLFWTD
- ID: 267117
如何引用文章
详细
In 2022–2023 in Leningrad region at potato Liga variety trials were conducted to evaluate mixture of herbicides Nexus (240 g/l of fomesafen) and Traser (480 g/l of clomazone) in the following schedules: 1.0 l/ha + 0.25 l/ha; 1.0 l/ha + 0.5 l/ha; 1.25 l/ha + 0.25 l/ha and 1.25 l/ha + 0.5 l/ha. The use of herbicides in their pure form acted as standard. The experiments were carried out in accordance with the methods of herbicide registration trials (2013; 2020). The use of tank-mix of herbicides Nexus + Traser made it possible to most fully control of mixed type of weediness, typical for the North-Western region. When applying a tank-mix herbicides in the regulations of 1.0…1.25 l/ha + 0.5 l/ha, the decrease in the weight of annual dicotyledonous weeds was at a level exceeding 75.0 %; the decrease in the weight of annual cereal weeds reached 88.3 %. The use of the herbicide Nexus in its pure form was most noticeably inferior to the application of tank-mix of herbicides Nexus + Traser (1.0…1.25 l/ha + 0.5 l/ha) in terms of effect on plants of barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv.)) and baconweed (Chenopodium album L.). The main advantage of a tank-mix of herbicides over the herbicide Traser in its pure form was realized in relation to the effect on pale persicaria (Polygonum lapathifolium L.). Reduced competition from weeds contributed to the preservation of potato yields of Liga variety cultivated in the North-Western region. Under normal moisture conditions, the potato yield after using a tank-mix of herbicides Nexus and Traser (31.0…35.8 t/ha) significantly exceeded the crop yield after using these herbicides in their pure form (17.5…23.3 t/ha).
全文:

作者简介
A. Tkach
All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: andrew_tka4@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 196608, Sankt-Peterburg–Pushkin, sh. Podbel’skogo, 3
A. Golubev
All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection
Email: andrew_tka4@mail.ru
кандидат биологических наук
俄罗斯联邦, 196608, Sankt-Peterburg–Pushkin, sh. Podbel’skogo, 3V. Dolzhenko
All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection
Email: andrew_tka4@mail.ru
доктор сельскохозяйственных наук, академик РАН
俄罗斯联邦, 196608, Sankt-Peterburg–Pushkin, sh. Podbel’skogo, 3参考
- Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China / Z. Hong, X. U. Fen, W. U. Yu, et al. // Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2017.Vol. 16. No. 12. P. 2924–2932. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61736-2.
- Comprehensive Environmental Assessment of Potato as Staple Food Policy in China / B. Gao, W. Huang, X. Xue, et al. // International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019.Vol. 16. No. 15. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695635/ (дата обращения 20.05.2024). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152700.
- The Potato of the Future: Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainable Agri-food Systems / A. Devaux, J. P. Goffart, P. Kromann, et al. // Potato Research. 2021.Vol. 64. P. 681–720. doi: 10.1007/s11540-021-09501-4.
- Посевные площади Российской Федерации в 2023 году // Федеральная служба государственной статистики. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/posev-4 %D1 %81 %D1 %85_2023.xlsx (дата обращения 20.05.2024).
- Nasir M. W, Toth Z. Effect of Drought Stress on Potato Production: A Review // Agronomy. 2022.Vol. 12. No. 3. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073–4395/12/3/635 (дата обращения 20.05.2024). doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030635.
- Germplasm, Breeding, and Genomics in Potato Improvement of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses Tolerance / J. K. Tiwari, T. Buckseth, R. Zinta, et al. // Frontiers in plant science. 2022.Vol. 13. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.805671/full (дата обращения 20.05.2024). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.805671.
- Resistance to biotic and abiotic stress in potato: the origin of the genes and corresponding molecular markers / S. Islam, J. Li, M. A. Rahman, et al. // Phytopathology Research. 2024.Vol. 6. URL: https://phytopatholres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42483-023-00222-9 (дата обращения 20.05.2024). doi: 10.1186/s42483-023-00222-9.
- Chauhan B. S. Grand Challenges in Weed Management // Frontiers in Agronomy. 2020.Vol. 1. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fagro.2019.00003/full (дата обращения 20.05.2024). doi: 10.3389/fagro.2019.00003.
- Potential potato yield loss from weed interference in the United States and Canada / Z. A. Ganie, N. Soltani, A. G. McKenzie-Gopsill, et al. // Weed Technology. 2023.Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 21–24. doi: 10.1017/wet.2023.5.
- Weed Control Efficacy, Growth and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as Affected by Alternative Weed Control Methods / S. A. Shehata, H. F. Abouziena, K. F. Abdelgawad, et al. // Potato Research. 2019.Vol. 62. P. 139–155. doi: 10.1007/s11540-018-9404-1.
- Majrashi A. A. Preliminary assessment of weed population in vegetable and fruit farms of Taif, Saudi Arabia // Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2022.Vol. 82. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35239821/ (дата обращения 20.05.2024). doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.255816.
- Оказова З. П. Критические периоды вредоносности сорных растений в посадках картофеля // International agricultural journal. 2022. № 6. С. 891–900. doi: 10.55186/25876740_2022_6_6_7.
- Hutchinson P. J. S. Hairy Nightshade Critical Interference Period in Potatoes // Weed Technology. 2014.Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 543–551. doi: 10.1614/WT-D-13-00160.1.
- Paul S. K., Mazumder S., Naidu R. Herbicidal weed management practices: History and future prospects of nanotechnology in an eco-friendly crop production system // Heliyon. 2024.Vol. 10. URL: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405–8440(24)02558–1?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2405844024025581 %3Fshowall%3Dtrue (дата обращения 10.05.2024). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26527.
- Towards reducing chemical usage for weed control in agriculture using UAS imagery analysis and computer vision techniques / R. Sapkota, J. Stenger, M. Ostlie, et al. // Scientific reports. 2023.Vol. 13. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33042-0 (дата обращения 11.05.2024). doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33042-0.
- Weeds control with herbicides applied in pre-emergence in potato cultivation= Controle de plantas daninhas com herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergência na cultura da batata / L. F. Fonseca, J. M. Q. Luz, I. N. Duarte, et al. // Bioscience Journal. 2018.Vol. 34. No. 2. P. 279–286. doi: 10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38261.
- Справочник пестицидов и агрохимикатов, разрешенных к применению на территории Российской Федерации. М.: МСХ, 2024. 881 с.
- Heap I. The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. URL: http://www.weedscience.org/Pages/SOASummary.aspx (дата обращения 22.05.24).
- Эколого-географическое обоснование формирования видового состава сорных растений на территории Республики Мордовии / Н. Н. Лунева, Е. Н. Мысник, Д. В. Бочкарев и др. // Аграрный научный журнал. 2017. № 6. С. 25–30.
- Ferhatoglu Y., Barrett V. Studies of clomazone mode of action // Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2006.Vol. 85. No. 1. P. 7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.10.002.
- Fomesafen Herbicide // Minnesota Department of Agriculture. URL: https://www.mda.state.mn.us/fomesafen-herbicide#:~: text=Mode%20of%20Action, chlorophyll%20and%20heme%20biosynthesis4 (дата обращения 22.05.2024).
- Голубев А. С., Ткач А. С. Чувствительность сорных растений к внесению фомесафена до всходов картофеля // Защита и карантин растений. 2022. № 7. С. 26–28. doi: 10.47528/1026$8634_2022_7_26.
- Голубев А. С., Ткач А. С. Эффективность использования кломазона для защиты картофеля от сорной растительности // Стратегия, приоритеты и достижения в развитии земледелия и селекции сельскохозяйственных растений в Беларуси: материалы международной научно-практической конференции, посвященной 95-летию научно-практического центра НАН Беларуси по земледелию. Жодино: УП «ИВЦ Минфина», 2022. С. 40–42.
- Голубев А. С., Маханькова Т. А. Методические рекомендации по проведению регистрационных испытаний гербицидов. СПб.: ООО «АльфаМиг», 2020. 80 с.
补充文件
