Interspecific crossing in gooseberry breeding as the basis for the industrial-type varieties creation

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

For optimal cultivation of gooseberries, the presence of industrial-type cultivars plays an important role, therefore, the study of economically useful parameters, such as resistance to diseases and pests, productivity, high commercial qualities of berries, suitability for combine harvesting is relevant. Consequently, the goal of the present research was to study remote gooseberry hybrids obtained on the genetic basis of a mighty gooseberry species (Grossularia robusta) involved in hybridization according to the main economic and biological characteristics. Selected gooseberry forms obtained from the remote (interspecific) hybridization with Grossularia robusta species were the studied material. The degree of damage by the American powdery mildew, the quality of berries and suitability for machine harvesting were assessed. As a result of the long – term study of hybrid offspring obtained from interspecific crosses, promising selected forms F2 9-283-1(2) and F2 9-283-1(6) (seedlings from the open pollination from the family 142-x36-12 × Grossularia robusta) have been identified, which are of interest for further practical breeding of gooseberries when creating commercial cultivars of industrial type.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

О. Kurashev

Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: kurashev@orel.vniispk.ru

PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Rússia, Zhilina, Oryol region

Z. Ozhereleva

Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding

Email: kurashev@orel.vniispk.ru

PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Rússia, Zhilina, Oryol region

S. Knyazev

Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding

Email: kurashev@orel.vniispk.ru

Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Rússia, Zhilina, Oryol region

Bibliografia

  1. Buchenkov I.E. Sozdanie iskhodnogo selekcionnogo materiala plodovo-yagodnyh kul’tur (smorodina chernaya i krasnaya, kryzhovnik, mikrovishnya vojlochnaya, chereshnya, ajva obyknovennaya). Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika, 2013. 201 c.
  2. Il’in V.S. Kryzhovnik. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural’skoe kn. izd-vo, 2007. 280 c.
  3. Koveshnikova E.Yu. Biologicheskie osobennosti sortov kryzhovnika v svyazi s mekhanizirovannoj uborkoj urozhaya // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2004. № 11. S. 411–420.
  4. Koveshnikova E.Yu. Perspektivy promyshlennogo proizvodstva plodov kryzhovnika // Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo. 2001. № 3. S. 24–27.
  5. Koveshnikova E.Yu. Sovershenstvovanie tekhnologii proizvodstva plodov kryzhovnika na osnove mekhanizirovannoj uborki urozhaya // Vestnik MichGAU. 2012. № 3. S. 80–85.
  6. Kosyakin A.S. Polveka nauchnyh issledovanij po ekonomike sadovodstva (1950-2000) // Istoriya, sovremennost’ i perspektivy sadovodstva Rossii: mat. Mezhd. konf. M., 2000. S. 344–385.
  7. Leonchenko V.G., Evseeva R.P., Zhbanova E.V., Cherenkova T.A. Predvaritel’nyj otbor perspektivnyh genotipov plodovyh rastenij na ekologicheskuyu ustojchivost’ i biohimicheskuyu cennost’ plodov. Michurinsk, 2007. 72 c.
  8. Popova I.V. Selekciya kryzhovnika v Podmoskov’e // Sovremennoe sostoyanie kul’tur smorodiny i kryzhovnika. 2007. C. 132–141.
  9. Salykova V.S. Hozyajstvenno-biologicheskaya ocenka otbornyh form otdalennyh gibridov smorodiny chernoj v usloviyah umerenno zasushlivoj i kolochnoj stepi Altajskogo Priob’ya: avtoref. dis … kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.01.07. Barnaul, 2008. 19 c.
  10. Sergeeva K.D. Kryzhovnik. M.: Agropromizdat, 1989. 206 c.
  11. Sorokopudov V.N., Kalugina S.V., Kuharuk N.S. i dr. Selekcionnaya ocenka sortov kryzhovnika na prigodnost’ k mekhanizirovannoj uborke urozhaya // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2020. № 4. S. 80–87. doi: 10.36718/1819-4036-2020-4-80-87
  12. Tolstoguzova V.G. Ural’skij kryzhovnik v Podmoskov’e // Priusadebnoe hozyajstvo. 2014. № 1. S. 26.
  13. Day E. Mechanical harvesting of soft fruit // The Agricultural Engineer. 1981. V. 36. № 2. P. 45–47.
  14. Neumann U., Sorg P. Sorten fur industriemassing Produktion von Strauchbeerenobst // Gartenbau. 1977. V. 24. No. 7. P. 213–214.
  15. Ozherelieva Z.E., Prudnikov P.S., Kurashev O.V., Krivushina D.A. Tolerance of gooseberry varietiesto maximally low temperature in the middle of winter // Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2018. V. 24. № 6. P. 1053–1058.
  16. Ourecky D. Promising small fruit varieties for V-pick operation // Proc. Ann. Meet. New-York State Hortic. Soc. Rochester, N.-Y. 1978. V. 123. P. 107–113.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Leaf condition of Grossularia robusta (a) and interspecific hybrids F1, F2 (b) obtained with Grossularia robusta (no signs of leaf spot lesions)

Baixar (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. Percentage of seedlings from hybrid families affected by leaf spots in 2019-2021: a - 258 (13-15-1 x Grossularia robusta), b - 288 (151-NS-7 x Grossularia robusta), c - 250 (23-17-10 x Grossularia robusta), d - 283 (142-x36-12 x Grossularia robusta)

Baixar (509KB)
4. Fig. 3. Percentage of AMR-affected seedlings from hybrid families in 2021: a - 263 (24-14-23 x Grossularia robusta), b - 288 (151-NS-7 x Grossularia robusta), c - 289 (152-x32-23 x Grossularia robusta), d - 282 (152-x32-24 x Grossularia robusta)

Baixar (389KB)
5. Fig. 4. Average berry weight in selected forms of gooseberry F2, 2019-2021

Baixar (305KB)
6. Fig. 5. Maximum berry weight in selected forms of gooseberry F2, 2019-2021

Baixar (334KB)
7. Fig. 6. Fruit of selected F2 seedling 9-283(2)-1(6) (142-x36-12 x Grossularia robusta)

Baixar (944KB)
8. Fig. 7. Relative berry strength coefficient in selected forms of gooseberry obtained from distant crosses with Grossularia robusta

Baixar (270KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies