The harmfulness of weeds in oat agrocenosis with underseeding of perennial grasses in the North-West of the Russian Federation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The results of the study of harmfulness of weeds in the oat with perennial grasses agrocenosis in the conditions of the North-West of the Russian Federation are presented. Assessment of harmfulness of weeds in oat crops in this region of cultivation this crop has not been previously carried out, and agricultural production has to comply with economic thresholds of harmfulness for other spring cereals that is not rightfully. The method of permanent plots and multiple regression analysis were used in the statistical processing of the obtained data on the weed infestation of oat crops. By the results of the study the harmfulness coefficients of weeds were 0,005 c/ha (0,18%) of oat crop losses from 1 copy/m2 of weed, and 0,267 c/ha (0,91%) for 1% of foliage projective cover in the tillering phase of oat, which can be used for the forecast of crop losses, as well as in the calculations of economic thresholds of harmfulness for this crop. Oat crop losses from weeds amounted to 2,22 c/ha (10,3%), according to the years of research they ranged from 0,4 to 5,2 c/ha (1,5–19,8%). The main losses of the crop were associated with the growth of the most widespread species in the crop – lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium album). Weeds influenced to all elements of the crop structure, mostly to the density of the productive stems (a decrease by 14,7%). The harmfulness of weeds increased in the case of severe damage to the stem of oats by the Swedish fly (by 1,8 times), as well as with an increase in the content of the main elements of mineral nutrition in the soil (by 2,2 times).

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. M. Shpanev

All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection

Author for correspondence.
Email: ashpanev@mail.ru

Grand PhD in Biological Sciences

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Pushkin

References

  1. Arestova N.O., Ryabchun I.O. Izmenenie vredonosnosti fitopatogenov v zavisimosti ot meteorologicheskih uslovij na vinogradnikah Nizhnego Pridon’ya // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2019. № 58. S. 102–108. doi: 10.31676/2073-4948-2019-58-102-108
  2. Voevodin A.V., Zubkov A.F., Kornilova E.N. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po ocenke vredonosnosti sornyh rastenij na zernovyh kul’turah. L., 1983. 27 s.
  3. Dedov A.V., Shevchenko V.A. Vliyanie razlichnyh sposobov osnovnoj obrabotki pochvy i udobrenij na zasorennost’ posevov i urozhajnost’ yachmenya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. T. 16. № 2 (77). S. 13–23. doi: 10.53914/issn2071-2243_2023_2_13.
  4. Zemlyanicyna S.V., Komarova O.P. Chislennost’ i vredonosnost’ fitofagov esparceta v zavisimosti ot agrohimicheskih fonov i predposevnoj obrabotki semyan Bishofitom // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2020. № 8. S. 5–10.
  5. Ivanov A.I., Fesenko M.A., Vertebnyj V.E., Dubovickaya V.I. Rezul’taty i razvitie issledovanij v mnogoletnem stacionarnom polevom opyte v semipol’nom sevooborote // Agrofizika. 2012. № 3. S. 50–57.
  6. Kabzar’ N.V., Soroka S.V., Soroka L.I. Porogi vredonosnosti odnoletnih dvudol’nyh zimuyushchih sornyh rastenij v posevah ozimogo tritikale // Zashchita rastenij. 2019. № 43. S. 18–25.
  7. Kaplin V.G., Katyuk A.I., Vasin V.G. i dr. Osobennosti razvitiya i vredonosnost’ gorohovoj zernovki Bruchus pisorum (L.) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) v lesostepi Srednego Povolzh’ya // Entomologicheskoe obozrenie. 2019. T. 98. № 3. S. 445–468.
  8. Morozov A.N., Dubovik D.V., Il’in B.S. Vliyanie sposobov osnovnoj obrabotki pochvy na zasorennost’ posevov, urozhajnost’ i kachestvo zerna soi // Tavricheskij vestnik agrarnoj nauki. 2022. № 2 (30). S. 74–85.
  9. Musaev M.R., Omariev Sh.Sh., Kuramagomedov A.U. i dr. Vliyanie razlichnyh sposobov obrabotki pochvy na zasorennost’ i urozhajnost’ kul’tur sevooborota // Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN. 2022. № 2 (106). S. 118–126. doi: 10.35330/1991-6639-2022-2-106-118-126.
  10. Purgin D.V., Usenko V.I., Kravchenko V.I. i dr. Formirovanie zasorennosti posevov v zernoparovom sevooborote v zavisimosti ot sposoba obrabotki pochvy i primeneniya sredstv himizacii // Zemledelie. 2019. № 8. S. 8–13.
  11. Chekmareva L.I., Denisov E.P., Lihackaya S.G. i dr. Vliyanie entomofagov na dinamiku chislennosti i vredonosnost’ zlakovoj tli pri razlichnoj obrabotke pochvy // Agrarnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2019. № 4. S. 48–53.
  12. Shpanev A.M. Vliyanie azotnyh udobrenij na fitosanitarnoe sostoyanie i poteri urozhaya yarovoj pshenicy ot vrednyh organizmov v Severo-Zapadnom regione // Agrohimiya. 2016. № 9. S. 62–69.
  13. Shpanev A.M. Vredonosnost’ sornyh rastenij v posevah pshenicy ozimoj na Severo-Zapade Rossii // Vestnik zashchity rastenij. 2018. № 2 (96). S. 42–46.
  14. Shchekleina L.M. Vliyanie pogodnyh faktorov na otdel’nye periody razvitiya griba Claviceps purpurea (Fr.) Tul i uroven’ vredonosnosti sporyn’i v Kirovskoj oblasti // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2019. № 20 (2). S. 134–143. doi: 10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.2.134-143
  15. Yushkevich L.V., Ershov V.L., Shchitov A.G. Vliyanie agrotekhnologij na zasorennost’ agrofitocenoza i produktivnost’ yarovoj pshenicy v lesostepi Zapadnoj Sibiri // Vestnik Omskogo GAU. 2021. № 1 (41). S. 75–84. doi: 10.48136/2222-0364_2021_1_75
  16. Kaur S., Kaur R., Chauhan B.S. Understanding crop-weed-fertilizer-water interactions and their implications for weed management in agricultural systems. Crop Protection. 2018. Vol. 103. P. 65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.09.011
  17. Kocira A., Staniak M. Weed Ecology and New Approaches for Management. Agriculture. 2021. Vol. 11 (3). P. 262.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies