Email this article Modern problems of preclinical studying feed additives for animals and ways to solve them
- Authors: Rakhmatullin E.K.1, Kadikov I.R.1, Kurshakova E.I.1, Sagdeev D.R.1, Korchemkin A.A.1, Vafin I.F.1, Galyautdinova G.G.1, Malanev A.V.1, Yamalova G.R.1, Khalikova K.F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
- Issue: No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 79-83
- Section: Zootechnics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2500-2082/article/view/255725
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500208224020169
- ID: 255725
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Resource-saving technology in agriculture is the use of stimulating additives in animal feeding rations that promote better absorption of feed. One of the measures to prevent toxicosis in industrial livestock and poultry farming is to determine the toxicity of feed. The variety of existing methods makes it possible to determine the level and class of drug toxicity at the initial stage. In the developed classification for veterinary drugs, the cumulation coefficient, therapeutic breadth index and dose level of toxic effect are used, which makes it possible to predict the nature and degree of their danger at the stage of preclinical study of feed additives. To determine the listed indicators, it is necessary to establish LD50 and the cumulation coefficient. Since feed additives are introduced into the body through the digestive tract, during preclinical studies they are studied and classified according to their hepatotoxic effect. Bilirubin, albumin, and enzyme activity contained in the blood (glutamate dehydrogenase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and the ratio of alanine aminotransferase to alkaline phosphatase) are used as markers. It is necessary to determine the de Ritis, Schmidt coefficient and the R index. This will minimize the intake of toxic feed additives into the animals’ bodies and will contribute to an increase in their productivity.
Full Text
About the authors
E. K. Rakhmatullin
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
Grand PhD in Veterinary Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanI. R. Kadikov
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
Grand PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanE. I. Kurshakova
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanD. R. Sagdeev
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Veterinary Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanA. A. Korchemkin
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanI. F. Vafin
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanG. G. Galyautdinova
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanA. V. Malanev
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanG. R. Yamalova
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
Junior Researcher
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanK. F. Khalikova
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation
Email: amil59@yandex.ru
PhD in Veterinary Sciences
Russian Federation, Kazan, Republic of TatarstanReferences
- Arzamascev E.V., Gus’kova T.A., Berezovskaya I.V. i dr. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po izucheniyu obshchetoksicheskogo dejstviya farmakologicheskih veshchestv // Rukovodstvo po eksperimental’nomu (doklinicheskomu) izucheniyu novyh farmakologicheskih veshchestv. M.: OAO Izdatel’stvo “Medicina”, 2005. S. 41–54.
- Gelashvili D.B., Bezel’ V.S., Romanova E.B. i dr. Principy i metody ekologicheskoj toksikologii / Nizhnij Novgorod: Nizhegorodskij gosuniversitet. 2015. 192 s.
- Golovnya E.Ya. Integral’naya ocenka toksichnosti kormov i kormovyh dobavok: dis. ... kand. biol. nauk. 2003. 138 s.
- GOST 32296-2013 «Metody ispytanij po vozdejstviyu himicheskoj produkcii na organizm cheloveka. Osnovnye trebovaniya k provedeniyu ispytanij po ocenke ostroj toksichnosti pri vnutrizheludochnom postuplenii metodom fiksirovannoj dozy». M.: Standartinform, 2014.
- GOST 33044-2014 «Principy nadlezhashchej laboratornoj praktiki» ot 20 noyabrya 2014 goda. docs.cntd.ru.
- GOST 33216-2014. «Rukovodstvo po soderzhaniyu i uhodu za laboratornymi zhivotnymi. Pravila soderzhaniya i uhoda za laboratornymi gryzunami i krolikami». M.: Standartinform, 2019. 15 s.
- GOST 12.1.007-76. “Vrednye veshchestva. Klassifikaciya i obshchie trebovaniya bezopasnosti”. M.: Standartinform, 2007.
- GOST 32419-2013 “Klassifikaciya opasnosti himicheskoj produkcii. Obshchie trebovaniya”. M.: Standartinform, 2014.
- Davydova A.V. Klinicheskaya interpretaciya biohimicheskogo analiza krovi pri zabolevaniyah pecheni: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov / GBOU VPO IGMU Minzdrava Rossii. Irkutsk: IGMU, 2013. S. 7–9.
- Dorofejkov V.V., Borisova I.V., Tarasova M.A. i dr. Laboratornaya diagnostika lekarstvenno-inducirovannyh porazhenij pecheni pri beremennosti // Translyacionnaya medicina. 2017. № 4 (3). S. 35–44. https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2017-4-3-35-44.
- Ivashkin V.T., Baranovskij A.YU., Rajhel’son K.L. i dr. Lekarstvennye porazheniya pecheni (klinicheskie rekomendacii dlya vrachej) // Rossijskij zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii, koloproktologii. 2019. № 29 (1). S. 101–131. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2019-29-1-101-131.
- Kargopol’ceva D.R., Kryshen’ K.L., Makarova M.N., Makarov V.G. Re¬gulyatornye i metodicheskie aspekty doklinicheskih i klinicheskih issledovanij kormovyh dobavok dlya zhivotnyh. Laboratornye zhivotnye dlya nauchnyh issledovanij. 2018. № 3. https://doi.org/10/29926/2618723X-2018-03-11.
- Koshchaev A.G., Grankina N.A., Borisenko V.V., Nikolaenko V.I. Izuchenie toksikologicheskogo dejstviya probioticheskoj kormovoj dobavki // Molodoj uchenyj. 2015. № 5.1. S. 12–14.
- Lysenko Yu.A., Luneva A.V. Izuchenie vliyaniya probioticheskoj kormovoj dobavki «Promomiks S» na produktivnost’ i biobezopasnost’ produkcii pticevodstva // ScienceTime. 2014. № 5 (5). S. 112–122.
- Prikaz Minsel’hoza ot 6 marta 2018 g. № 101 “Ob utverzhdenii pravil provedeniya doklinicheskogo issledovaniya lekarstvennogo sredstva dlya veterinarnogo primeneniya, klinicheskogo issledovaniya lekarstvennogo preparata dlya veterinarnogo primeneniya, issledovaniya bioekvivalentnosti lekarstvennogo preparata dlya veterinarnogo primeneniya”.
- Rahmatullin E.K., Sklyarov O.D. Izuchenie toksichnosti veterinarnyh preparatov na doklinicheskom etape // Vestnik rossijskoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 2019. № 5. S. 61–64.
- Taranov M.T. Izuchenie sdvigov obmena veshchestv u zhivotnyh // Zhivotnovodstvo. 1983. № 9. S.49-50.
- Deichmann W. B. et al. Determination of the approximate lethal dose with about six animals J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. (1943)
- Directive 2010/63/EU of The European Parliament and of The Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, L 276/52.
- The De Ritis Ratio: The Test of Time Mona Botros, Kenneth A Sikaris Clin Biochem Rev. 2013. V. 34 (3). PP. 117–130.
