Methodological potential of explanatory models of the world-system approach in human research (on the example of Christopher Chitty's concept of sexual hegemony)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of this study is the process of developing theoretical tools of the world-systems approach in the field of human studies, using K. Chitty's concept of sexual hegemony as an example. The basic problematics of the world-system approach is in the field of macro-processes. The micro-level of societal reality is often inaccessible to the world-system optics. However, relying on the ontology of macro-processes inherent in the world-system approach, the followers of this paradigm complete theoretical constructions by synthesis with intermediate models of other concepts, improving the world-system optics according to the subject under study. In the work of C. Chitty there is such a refinement of theory. Moreover, the emphasis on the economic sphere, intrinsic to the world-system approach as a branch of Marxism, precludes the attainment of an ontology of the human being, since contemporary research is compelled to shift the focus to the household. In his study of human ontology, К. Citty draws on another crucial set of world-system ideas, encapsulated in the concept of the «hegemony of geoculture». К. Citty analyzes the socio-economic sources of Western queer culture and the reasons for its politicization in the core of the world-system on the basis of a synthesis of the concept of cycles of development of the world system by G. Arrighi, the idea of class hegemony by A. Gramsci and the ideas of culture and the nature of human sexuality in the psychoanalysis of Z. Freud. Citty's research focuses on the mechanisms of state and social control of queer cultural representatives in European history since the XV century. He explains the processes of politicization of sexuality in the central, time-shifting nodal points of the world system (the Mediterranean, Holland, England, and the United States) during its crises. The conclusions emphasize that the innovation of C. Chitty's methodology lies in the fact that he creates a theoretical construct that allows us to see human sexuality in the totality of factors of different levels of societal reality. The theoretical constructs proposed by K. Chitty can be useful. Citty's theoretical constructs can be useful for understanding the clash between political power and representatives of queer culture in the context of destructive world-system processes that are gaining momentum.

References

  1. Hall T. D. Introduction: World-Systems analysis: A small sample from a large universe // A world-systems reader: New perspectives on gender, urbanism, cultures, indigenous peoples, and ecology / Ed. T. D. Hall. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. P. 3-27.
  2. Wallerstein I. The modern world-system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press, 1974. 410 p.
  3. Wallerstein I. The Essential Wallerstein. New York: The New Press, 2000. 471 p.
  4. Wallerstein I. Geopolitics and geoculture. Essays on the changing world-system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 243 p.
  5. Culture, globalization and the world-system contemporary conditions for the representation of identity / Ed. A. D. King. New York: Palgrave, 1991. 186 p.
  6. Shapiro St. Zemiperiphery matters. immigration, culture, and the capitalist world-system // Wallerstein 2.0. Thinking and applying world-systems theory in the 21st century / Ed. Frank Jacob. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishing, 2023. P. 155-175.
  7. Immanuel Wallerstein and the problem of the world: system, scale, culture / Eds. D. Palumbo-Liu, B. Robbins, N. Tanoukhi. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2011. 264 p.
  8. Rethinking environmental history. World-system history and global environmental change / Ed. A. Hornborg, J. R. McNeill, J. Martinez-Aller, I. Wallerstein. New York: Altamira Press, 2007. 409 p.
  9. Arnove F. Comparative education and world-systems analysis // Comparative education review. 1980. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 48-62. doi: 10.1086/446090
  10. Demeter M. The World-systemic dynamics of knowledge production: The distribution of transnational academic capital in the social sciences // Journal of world-system research. 2019. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 111-144. doi: 10.5195/JWSR.2019.887
  11. Griffiths T. G., Knezevic L. Wallerstein's world-systems analysis in comparative education: A case study // Prospects. 2010. Vol. 40. P. 447-463. doi: 10.1007/s11125-010-9168-0
  12. Chitty C. Sexual hegemony: Statecraft, sodomy, and capital in the rise of the world-system. London: Duke University Press, 2020. 236 p.
  13. Hopkins T. K. The study of the capitalist world-economy. Some introductory considerations // World-systems analysis: Theory and methodology / Ed. T. K. Hopkins, I. Wallerstein, et al. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982. P. 9-38.
  14. Wallerstein I. Citizens all? Citizens some! The making of the citizen // Comparative studies in society and history. 2003. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 650-679. doi: 10.1017/S0010417503000318 EDN: ECHAHH
  15. Adick Ch. Globale Trends weltweiter Schulentwicklung: Empirische Befunde und theoretischer Erklärungen // Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. 2003. № 3. S. 173-187. doi: 10.1007/s11618-003-0022-5 EDN: BWMYUH
  16. Персидская О. А. Воспроизводство этничности в миросистемном анализе и теории капиталов П. Бурдье // Respublica Literaria. 2024. Т. 5. № 3. С. 137-153. doi: 10.47850/RL.2024.5.3.137-153 EDN: RHDJVK
  17. Изгарская А. А. § 1.5. Россия на распутье в пространстве геокультуры // Колесо времени: новый осевой поворот. Новосибирск: Новосибирский государственный университет экономики и управления, 2024. С. 136-160.
  18. Cull M. J. Towards a queer realism: Christopher Chitty: Sexual hegemony-statecraft, sodomy, and capital in the rise of the world system // Woman, gender & research. 2022. № 1: Sexualities and Critiques of Capital. P. 126-128. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v32i1.128335
  19. Vu V. Review of Christopher Chitty's Sexual hegemony: Statecraft, sodomy, and capital in the rise of the world system // PASSING. Ed. H. Kimberly, D. Lark. 2022. Spring. № 1. P. 53-55.
  20. Tian I. L. Book review. Christopher Chitty. Sexual hegemony: statecraft, sodomy, and capital in the rise of the world system // Sexualities. 2021. Vol. 1-2. P. 1-2. doi: 10.1177/13634607211056188
  21. Hopkins T. K. World-systems analysis: Methodological issues // World-systems analysis: Theory and methodology / Ed. T. K. Hopkins, I. Wallerstein. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982. P. 145-158.
  22. Wallerstein I. What are we bounding, and whom, when we bound social research // Social research. 1995. Vol. 62. № 4. P. 839-856. EDN: HKLFFB
  23. Дерлугьян Г. М. Самый неудобный теоретик // Валлерстайн И. Миросистемный анализ. Введение. М.: УРСС: ЛЕЛАНД, 2018. С. 5-42.
  24. Kahan B. Conjectures on the sexual world-system // GLQ. 2017. June. P. 327-357. doi: 10.1215/10642684-3818441
  25. Kandal T. R. Revolution, racism and sexism: Challenges for world-system analysis // Studies in comparative international development. 1990-1991. Winter. Vol. 25. № 4. P. 86-102.
  26. Traußneck M. Kolonialität, Sex und Demokratietheorie // Politik und Geschlecht. Perspektiven der Politikwissenschaftlichen Geschlechterforschung / Herausgeber: C. M. Klapeer, J. Leinius, F. Martinsen, H. Mauer, I. Nüthen. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2024. S. 73-83.
  27. Racism, sexism and the world-system / Ed. J. Smith, J. Collins, T. K. Hopkins, A. Muhammad. New York: Greenwood, 1988. 233 p.
  28. Арриги Дж. Долгий двадцатый век. Деньги, власть и истоки нашего времени. Москва: Изд. дом "Территория будущего", 2006. 472 с.
  29. Грамши А. Тюремные тетради. М.: Издательство политическая литература, 1991. 560 с.
  30. Кернберг О. Ф. Отношения любви: Норма и патология. М.: Класс, 2000. 256 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).