A game of hide and seek. Dramatic Mechanisms in Chekhov's «The Seagull»
- Authors: Gorbachev I.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 8 (2023)
- Pages: 77-101
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0757/article/view/366295
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WOZNVF
- ID: 366295
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The analysis of the play "The Seagull" undertaken in the article is based on an unusual assumption. Chekhov's phrase is known that "after writing a story, you should cross out its beginning and end." What if we apply this "formula" to the dramatic works of Anton Pavlovich and assume that when finishing the plays, Chekhov "left out some part of the text"? The analysis of the "Seagull" is performed directly by the classic tool of directors – the method of effective analysis. The work involved a wide range of facts about the social and everyday realities of the Russian Empire of the late XIX - early XX century. The choice of the play "The Seagull" is due to two reasons. Firstly, it is one of Chekhov's most famous and popular dramas. Interest in it has not waned for many decades, neither the audience nor the directors. Secondly, it is believed that the "Seagull" is read inside and out, and working with it is a challenge for the researcher. The analysis of "The Seagull" allows us to state that Chekhov's formula about "crossing out the beginning and the end" of the story is also applicable to his plays. Moreover, this "crossing out" is made taking into account the principles of classical drama. As a result, the reader is faced with the fact that the "Seagull" can be read in at least two – almost opposite in meaning – ways. The results obtained during the analysis, firstly, give grounds to assume that the case of the "Seagull" is not an isolated one, and Chekhov resorted to similar techniques in his other dramas. Secondly, to conclude that the "dramatic mechanism" of The Seagull is not just an attribute of the author's voice, but actually the path of evolution of classical drama proposed by Chekhov.
About the authors
Igor' Nikolaevich Gorbachev
Email: igorgorbachoff@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7861-0421
References
Бунин И. А. Чехов // Чехов в воспоминаниях современников. – М.: Художественная литература, 1986. 754 c. Поламишев. А. Событие – основа спектакля // В лаборатории театрального педагога / М.А. Пантелеева, Ю.А. Стромов, А.М. Поламишев. – М.: Русскiй Мiръ, 2011. 408 с. Кнебель М. Поэзия педагогики. – М. ВТО, 1984. 528 с. Чехов А. П. Полн. собр. соч. и писем в 30 т. – Т. 13 (Пьесы). – М.: Наука, 1986. 520 с. Ленин В. И. Полн. собр. соч. и писем в 55 т. – Т. 16. – М.: Издательство политической литературы, 1973. 697 с. Данилкин Л. Ленин. Пантократор солнечных пылинок. – М.: Молодая гвардия, 2017. С. 58-67. Орлов В. Н. Студенческое движение Московского университета в XIX столетии. – М.: Всесоюзное о-во полит. каторжан и ссыльно-поселенцев, 1934. С. 253-321. Сонди П. Теория современной драмы. – М.: V-A-C Press, 2020. 148 с. Катаев Б. В. Чехов плюс…: Предшественники, современники, приемники. – М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. 223 с. Станиславский К.С. Собр. соч. в 8 т. – Т.5. – М.: Искусство, 1954. 547 с. Афанасьев Э. С. Постклассический реализм Чехова // Новый мир. 2017. № 4. С. 146-169. Гуревич А. М. Три стадии русского реализма. К спорам о литературных направлениях // А. Н. Островский, А. П. Чехов и литературный процесс XIX-XX вв. М.: Интрада, 2003. С. 480-495. Набоков В.В. Лекции по русской литературе. М.: Независимая газета, 1998. 440 c. Чехов А. П. Полн. собр. соч. и писем в 30 т. – Т. 11 (Письма). – М.: Наука, 1982. 718 с.
Supplementary files
