Japanese design as "monozukuri": from Mingei to MUJI

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to understanding the current concept of Japanese design, called "monozukuri" associated by the Japanese with the realm of the sacred, as it refers to the act of putting a new soul into a thing. In the Japanese tradition, "monozukuri" is also associated with "hitozukuri" (lit. "creating people"), that is, with the idea that a "good" product is produced by a "good" person. Therefore, design as "monozukuri" is broader than the understanding of design as a "craft". In the course of the study, the authors turn to the "artisanal source" of Japanese design, namely, the Westernized understanding of "handicraft" within the Mingei movement (developed since the second half of the 1920s), and then turn to overcoming this understanding in the later concept of Japanese design, which is represented by MUJI company (founded in 1980-year). The purpose of the research is to understand the current concept of Japanese design, which is the most theoretically developed. The methodological basis of the work consists of historical (historical-genetic and historical-comparative) and analytical (formally descriptive and stylistic) methods of art criticism. In the course of the study, the authors note that in Japan, where the social status of a master of traditional arts has always been very high, understanding design as "monozukuri" gives social weight to the profession of a designer. The authors of the study conclude that the requirement for the mental and physical development of a designer today should be considered not so much as a tool for mythologizing his personality, but rather as a condition for improving the quality of his work. This is all the more important because the development of technologies designed to facilitate the work of a designer, according to the authors, may lead to further emasculation of the profession.

References

  1. Sumihara N. Multiple Discourse on Monozukuri as a Keyhole to View Modern Japan // Campbell P. R. (Ed.). Global Perspectives on Japan: A Yearly Academic Journal. Inaugural Special Issue on 26th Japanese Anthropology Workshop. Istanbul: Japanese Studies Association on Turkey, 2015. С. 67-78.
  2. Yanagi S. The Beauty of Everyday Things. London: Penguin Classics, 2019.
  3. Pollock N. Japanese Design Since 1945: A Complete Sourcebook. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2020.
  4. Hara K. Designing Design. Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers, 2018.
  5. Hara K. White. Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers, 2009.
  6. Hara K. Ex-formation. Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers, 2015.
  7. Hara K. Designing Japan. Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers, 2019.
  8. Fukasawa N. Naoto Fukasawa: Embodiment. London, New York: Phaidon Press, 2018.
  9. Taku S. Just Enough Design: Reflections on the Japanese Philosophy of Hodo-hodo. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2022.
  10. Morrison J. Muji. Milan: Rizzoli International Publications, 2010.
  11. Leach B., Soetsu Y., Shoji H. The Unknown Craftsman: A Japanese Insight into Beauty. New York: Kodansha USA, 1990.
  12. Brandt K. Kingdom of Beauty: Mingei and the Politics of Folk Art in the Imperial Japan. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
  13. Скворцова Е. Японская философия как синтез мыслительных традиций // Историческая психология и социология истории. 2019. № 1. С. 133-147. EDN: JLZUKI.
  14. Castel C. “Nihonjinron” in the museums of Paris: design and Japanese identity // Cipango: French Journal of Japanese Studies. 2012. No. 1. Дата обращения 04.05.2025. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/cjs/227.
  15. Kikuchi Yu. Japan's Modernisation and Mingei Theory: Cultural Nationalism and Oriental Orientalism. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2004.
  16. Noguchi H. The Idea of the Body in Japanese Culture and Its Dismantlement // International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2004. No. 2. С. 8-24.
  17. Пронников В. Икэбана, или Вселенная, запечатленная в цветке. М.: Наука, 1985.
  18. Герасимова М. Ёдзё – критерий художественности в японской эстетике // Вестник института востоковедения РАН. 2021. № 2 (16). С. 144-156. doi: 10.31696/2618-7302-2021-2-144-156. EDN: KQPZOP.
  19. Ose M. Three forms of traditional Japanese art: Shin-Gyo-So. Osaka: Osaka Shiritsu Daigaku Daigakuin Shushi ronbun kogaishu, 2004. (на японском языке).
  20. Скворцова Е. Японская духовная традиция в свете проблемы "разума тела" // Философия: научные исследования. 2014. № 3 (15). С. 258-270.
  21. Kurokawa M. Yattsu-no Nihon-nobiishiki [Восемь японских эстетических чувства]. Tokyo: Kodan-sha, 2006. (на японском языке).
  22. Murata Ch. “Potential of Sensibility” Thinking. Tokyo: Japan Productivity Center, 2017. (на японском языке).
  23. Судзуки Д. Дзэн и японская культура. СПб.: Наука, 2003.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).