Active Ageing and Digital Culture of Older Adults: A Cultural Analysis of the Chinese Experience

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of the study is the cultural analysis of the digital participation of older adults in China and the identification of its role in the processes of active ageing. Digitalization affects all spheres of life, including culture, education, and everyday practices, opening new opportunities for the preservation of memory and the expansion of social participation. For older people, digital culture becomes not only a means of communication but also a resource of cultural identity, an instrument for overcoming social isolation, and a channel of intergenerational transmission. The study examines such key categories as symbolic capital, cultural memory, and everyday practices, which make it possible to interpret the experience of older users in the media environment as a specific form of cultural participation. The analysis also draws on the concepts of cultural citizenship and structuration theory, highlighting the active inclusion of the older generation in the public sphere. Thus, digital culture appears as an independent sociocultural phenomenon, shaping a new model of getting old. The methodology is based on cultural analysis and an interdisciplinary approach, combining cultural studies, sociology, and gerontology. The empirical basis consists of qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with respondents aged 60–69 who had experience using digital cultural services (online lectures, virtual exhibitions, educational courses). The results of the study show that the perception of the digital environment by older adults is determined not only by the functional parameters of services (simplicity, usefulness, attractiveness) but also by cultural dimensions (identity, memory, intergenerational practices). Trust and the level of digital competence act as mediators between external stimuli and readiness for cultural participation, while mastering digital skills reduces feelings of social isolation and strengthens intergenerational ties. Educational initiatives linking digital literacy with local heritage (for example, courses in libraries and universities of the third age) form sustainable practices of “digital heritage.” The scientific novelty of the study lies in the cultural interpretation of digital participation of older adults as a symbolic resource that ensures the transmission of memory and the affirmation of cultural citizenship. The conclusions emphasize that digital culture is becoming an independent space of active ageing, while the practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using its results for the development of cultural policy and digital humanities projects aimed at expanding the rights and opportunities of the older generation.

About the authors

Songming Zou

Email: zsm199377@qq.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-1875-0269

References

  1. Wang, P. Zong renkou jianshao renshiliang tizhi jixu wanshan. China Information News. 2025; (001). https://doi.org/10.38309/n.cnki.nzgxx.2025.000063
  2. World Health Organization. Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
  3. Ren, Y. “Jihuo laoling” shijian zhong de shijian tansuo. Public Health News. 2022; (002). https://doi.org/10.28213/n.cnki.ndzjk.2022.000459
  4. Nimrod, G. Probing the audience of seniors' online communities. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2013; 68(5): 773-782. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt046
  5. Xiong, L., Zuo, M. Digital inclusion of older adults in China: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 2021; 33(5): 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2021.1879035
  6. Ministerstvo kul'tury i turizma KNR. Doklad o tsifrovoi transformatsii kul'tury v period 14-i pyatiletki. Beijing; 2021.
  7. Li, H. Tsifrovoe neravenstvo i kul'turnoe uchastie pozhilykh lyudei v Kitae. Sovremennye problemy kul'turologii. 2020; (4): 55-62.
  8. Chen, M. Shuzi shiyong zhong laonianren de kunnan: yige wenhuaxue fenxi. Wenhua yanjiu. 2021; (2): 37-44.
  9. Zhao, Y. Online health information seeking behaviors among older adults: systematic scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2022; 24(2): e34790.
  10. Sun, L. Elderly users and digital alienation: A sociocultural approach. Asian Journal of Communication. 2023; 33(5): 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2203415
  11. Laslett, P. A fresh map of life: The emergence of the Third Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989.
  12. Rowe, J. W., Kahn, R. L. Successful aging. The Gerontologist. 1997; 37(4): 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433
  13. Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, editor. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood; 1986. p. 241-258.
  14. de Certeau, M. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.
  15. Habermas, J. Citizenship and national identity. Praxis International. 1992; 12(1): 1-19.
  16. Habermas, J. The postnational constellation: political essays. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000. 198 p.
  17. Jenkins, H. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press; 2009.
  18. Giddens, A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984.
  19. Butler, J. Performative acts and gender constitution. Theatre Journal. 1988; 40(4): 519-531.
  20. Fischer-Lichte, E. The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics. London: Routledge; 2008.
  21. Assmann, J. Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
  22. Etkind, A. Hard and soft in cultural memory. Grey Room. 2004; 16: 36-59.
  23. Etkind, A. Post-Soviet hauntology. Constellations. 2009; 16(1): 182-200.
  24. Etkind, A. Warped mourning: Stories of the undead in the land of the unburied. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2013.
  25. Selwyn, N. The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies. 2004; 18(4): 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.008
  26. Mead, M. Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. New York: Natural History Press / Doubleday & Co; 1970.
  27. Mannheim, K. Das Problem der Generationen. Kölner Vierteljahrshefte für Soziologie. 1928; 7: 157-185.
  28. Strauss, W., Howe, N. Generations: The history of America's future, 1584–2069. New York: William Morrow & Co; 1991.
  29. Mehrabian, A., Russell, J. A. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1974.
  30. Nimrod, G. Aging well in the digital age: Technology use among older adults. Educational Gerontology. 2014; 40(12): 825-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2014.899389
  31. Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K. Digital literacy and seniors: Trust, privacy, and online information behavior. Information, Communication & Society. 2013; 16(4): 614-636. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.770966
  32. Brosius, H.-B., Weimann, G. The utility of utility: The usefulness dimension as a predictor of media choice. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 1996; 40(3): 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364365
  33. Xie, B. Using the internet for offline learning: A case study of US older adults. Educational Gerontology. 2007; 33(5): 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270701252872
  34. Pan, Q., Wang, Y. Laonianren shuzi honggou kunjing ji duice yanjiu. Journal of Liaoning Institute of Economics and Management Cadres. 2025; (3): 24-26.
  35. Chen, K., Chan, A. H. S. A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology. 2011; 10(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006
  36. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M. Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society. 2011; 13(6): 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
  37. Hargittai, E. Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday. 2002; 7(4). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942
  38. Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B. How older adults use the internet. Information, Communication & Society. 2004; 7(2): 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118042000208928
  39. Ng, W. Older adults' digital literacy: Understanding and managing risks in the online environment. Educational Gerontology. 2021; 47(2-3): 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1717440
  40. Livingstone, S., Helsper, E. J. Gradations in digital inclusion. New Media & Society. 2007; 9(4): 671-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
  41. Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989; 13(3): 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  42. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model. Management Science. 2000; 46(2): 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  43. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003; 27(3): 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  44. Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., et al. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010; 26(6): 1710-1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).