The mimesis of the on-screen interface and the essence of technology: a philosophical analysis
- Authors: Pluzhnikova N.N.1, Saenko N.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 1-9
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0625/article/view/367428
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NUOGGH
- ID: 367428
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The work is devoted to the philosophical analysis of a number of culturological factors related primarily to visual genres and forms of culture, the subsequent impact of which on the rapid development of scientific and technological progress in the last decades of the XX – first decades of the XXI century directly or indirectly influenced the features of the functioning and appearance of the interface of screen devices in their now familiar form. The historically alternating cultural requirements for transformations of visual images in relation to their perception were investigated in diachrony. Through the analysis of visual culture, the authors consider modern technology as a unity of three components: technological, socio-cultural and anthropological. These components allow us to present the technique as an integral phenomenon for philosophical consideration. The research methodology is based on the use of empirical material from the field of modern technology development, and also includes an analysis of historical, philosophical and cultural sources related to the study of technology. When comparing the mimetic forms of traditional culture with the mimetic ways of reflecting the screen-type interface, a comparative typological approach is applied. The scientific novelty of the research lies in an attempt to compare the mimetic forms of traditional culture with the mimetic ways of reflecting the screen-type interface. By comparing these forms, the authors go out to study a broader phenomenon of modern society and culture – the phenomenon of technology. This research contributes to the development of the philosophy of technology in Russia. One of the tasks of the philosophy of technology is to study the subject of technical activity, which functions today as a new technical environment, in the context of digital and nanotechnology. Technical activity is the basis for the emergence of new knowledge about society. Technology acts as a form of materialization of ideas in practice, affects the development of technical sciences, all branches of knowledge in the modern world. Screen culture acts as a part of technical development based on the digitalization of technologies, but at the same time, it allows us to present technology as a unity of technology, man and society.
Keywords
About the authors
Natalia Nikolaevna Pluzhnikova
Email: pluzhnikova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4143-1216
Natalya Ryafikovna Saenko
Email: rilke@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9422-064X
References
Литвинцева Г. Ю. Массовая культура в проекте модерна и постмодерна. СПб.: Издательство СПбГУКИ, 2014. Марков А. В. Лекции PRO: Постмодерн культуры и культура постмодерна. М.: Рипол-Классик, 2018. Берлева И. Н. Интеграция экранности в социокультурное пространство: культурфилософская аналитика // Контекст и рефлексия: философия о мире и человеке. 2022. Том 11. № 5А. С. 257-263. Разлогов К. Э. Экранная культура. Теоретические проблемы. СПб.: Дмитрий Буланин, 2012. Григорьев С. Л., Котусов Д. В. Экранное потребление как условие формирования «общества переживаний» // Гуманитарные ведомости ТГПУ им. Л. Н. Толстого. 2023. № 2(46). С. 48-58. Melro A., Oliveira L. Screen culture // Advanced methodologies and technologies in artificial intelligence, computer simulation, and human-computer interaction. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour. 2019. P. 586-599. Donochaw L. What would you like to look inside your smart phone screen? // Screen scientific researches Gobankingrates. URL: https://www.gobankingrates.com. (дата обращения: 12.04.2024). Beaglehole E. Evaluation Techniques for Induced Technological Change // International Social Science Bulletin, Vol. VII, No. 3 (1955). P. 376-386. Bernard L. Invention and Social Progress // American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 29 (July 2023). Pp. 1-33. Crozier M. La Civilisation technique. URL: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/jacques-ellul-the-technological-system (дата обращения: 14.01.2024). Fried J. The Social and Economic Role of Technicians. International Labour Review. 2005. Vol. 55. P. 512-537. Goodman L. Man and Automation. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1957. Dugger W. M. Two Twists in Economic Methodology: Positivism and Subjectivism // The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 1983. Vol. 42. No. 1. Pp. 75-91. Hassan R. The Culture of Digitality // The Condition of Digitality: A Post-Modern Marxism for the Practice of Digital Life, University of Westminster Press, 2020. Pp. 129-158. Garner S. The Hopeful Cyborg. Transhumanism and Transcendence: Christian Hope in an Age of Technological Enhancement. Georgetown University Press. 2011. Pp. 87-10. Bach A., Shaffer G., Wolfson T. Digital Human Capital: Developing a Framework for Understanding the Economic Impact of Digital Exclusion in Low-Income Communities // Journal of Information Policy, 2013. Vol. 3. Pp. 247-266. Bambrough R. One-Dimensional Man by Herbert Marcuse. Philosophy, Vol. 69, No. 269 (Jul., 1994). Pp. 380-381. Critchlow N. Nathan Health and well-being in the digital society // Social determinants of health: An interdisciplinary approach to social inequality and wellbeing, Policy Press. 2018. Pp. 103-118. Дессауэр Ф. Спор о технике. Самара: Изд-во Самарской гуманитарной акад., 2017. Плужникова Н.Н. Техника и социально-антропологические риски сциентизма в современном обществе // Общество: философия, история, культура. 2024. № 8 (124). С. 55-59.
Supplementary files
