Artionyms in the semiotics of a painting
- Authors: Pogorelova I.V.1, Tarasova P.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 48-54
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0625/article/view/367320
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VCIPUL
- ID: 367320
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of this article is the semiotics of a painting as a work of art. The object of the study is the functioning of the title of a painting as a sign constituting its semiotic space. At the same time, the picture itself is considered as a complex sign that carries out a special kind of communication between the sender and the recipient. The main conclusions of the study are the thesis that semiosis occurring in the process of interaction between the viewer and a work of art is largely based on the artionymic text, as well as the conclusion that follows from it that, despite the generally accepted characteristic of modern culture as a visual culture, the text continues to play an important civilisational role as a conductor and keeper of various kinds of information. When decoding a message conveyed by the complex sign “painting”, under the conditions of limited perception time, the recipient tends to extract information and interpret it through a textual channel (i.e. through an artionym). The novelty of the study lies in considering the artionym not only as a small-format text, but also as a sign involved in the transmission of information in the situation of perceiving a painting by the recipient.
Keywords
About the authors
Inga Viktorovna Pogorelova
Email: ingalgpu3@mail.ru
Polina Sergeevna Tarasova
Email: polina_tarasova_2003@mail.ru
References
Ю.М. Лотман и тартуско-московская семиотическая школа / Сост. и отв. ред. А.Д. Кошелев. М.: Гнозис, 1994. 560 с. Махлина С.Т. Лингвистика и семиотика: учебник и практикум для вузов. Москва: Издательство Юрайт, 2022. 260 с. Мечковская Н.Б. Семиотика. Язык. Природа. Культура. М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2008. 432 с. Степанов Ю.С. Семиотика. М.: URSS, 2023. 168 с. Barthes R. Signs and Images: Writings on Art, Cinema and Photography / Ed. by Ch. Turner. London: Seagull Books, 2023. 152 p. Chandler D. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge, 2022. 384 p. Борисенко Р.А. Цифровые технологии в современном знаково-символическом пространстве // Вестник науки и образования. 2023. №5(136)-1, 2023. С. 109-111. Олянич А.В. Искусствоведческий дискурс // Дискурс-Пи. 2015. №2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/iskusstvovedcheskiy-diskurs (дата обращения: 10.11.2023). Бирюков Б.В. Знак // Философский энциклопедический словарь. М.: Советская Энциклопедия, 1983. 840 с. Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов. М.: Либроком, 2018. 576 с. Danto A. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021. 272 p. Wagner-Pacifici R. What is an event? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2017. 240 p. Franklin, M. B., Becklen, R. C., & Doyle, C. L. The Influence of Titles on How Paintings Are Seen // Leonardo. 1993. No 2, vol. 26. Pp. 103-108. Letters of Gustave Courbet / Ed. by Petra ten-Doesschate Chu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992. 733 p. Кубрякова Е.С. О тексте и критериях его определения // Текст. Структура и семантика. Т.1. М., 2001. С. 72-81. Афанасьевская Н.В. Трансформация понятия «образ» в контексте визуального поворота в культуре // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2021. №8 (850). С. 202-211. Воеводина Л.Н. Визуальный поворот и новые культурные практики // Вестник Московского государственного университета культуры и искусств. 2023. №3 (113), 2023. С. 97-103. Mirzoeff N. An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge, 2023. 328 p. Mitchell W.J.T. Image Science: Iconology, Visual Culture, and Media Aesthetics. The MIT Press, 2020. 272 p. Murray D.C. Visual Culture Approaches to the Selfie. London: Routledge, 2023. 224 p.
Supplementary files
