Rethinking the principles of work forensic medical experts in emergencies cases with massive human casualties

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

For many years, the topic of the participation of forensic experts in the elimination of the consequences of emergencies with a large number of human casualties has remained relevant. Every year, there are more reports about problematic issues of the organization and provision of forensic medical support in cases of mass death of people, particularly in armed conflicts.

The presented report attempts to rethink the tasks and formulate the principles of forensic medical specialists who work in emergencies, including mass death and unknown disappearances of people.

Based on international and domestic experiences, work is needed to standardize procedures and algorithms for registering primary information and identifying signs of the deceased.

Standardized work algorithms and standardized forms are important for deceased identification because they simplify and formalize the registration, description, and subsequent information sharing on unidentified dead bodies, avoiding mistakes and omissions.

About the authors

Vladimir A. Klevno

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute

Email: vladimir.klevno@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5693-4054
SPIN-code: 2015-6548

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Aleksandr V. Maksimov

Moscow Region State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mcsim2004@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1936-4448
SPIN-code: 3134-8457

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Aleksei S. Abramov

International Committee of the Red Cross, Regional delegation in Moscow

Email: idenfac@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4982-3679

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Stephen C, Tidball-Binz M. Humanitarian forensic action — Its origins and future. Forens Sci Int. 2017;279:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.011
  2. Gaggioli G. International humanitarian law: The legal framework for humanitarian forensic action. Forens Sci Int. 2018;282:184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.10.035
  3. Shigeev SV, Fetisov VA, Gusarov AA, Kumykova LR. Specific features of application of interpol international guide in identification of the persons dead in natural disasters and catastrophes with massive human victims. Criminalist’s library. Scientific journal. 2018;(1):235–240. (In Russ).
  4. Beltrán-Gil I, Lopez-Cerquera MA, Muñoz LG, Rios SI. Forensic treatment and human identification in the age of COVID-19: Difficulties and challenges for the forensic medical system in Mexico. Human Remains Violence. 2022;8(1):47–66. doi: 10.7227/HRV.8.1.4
  5. Salado PM, Abboud D, Baraybar JP, et al. The search process: Integrating the investigation and identification of missing and unidentified persons. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021;3:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100154
  6. Volkov AV, Kolkutin VV, Klevno VA, et al. Problems of the organization of identification of the person at the mass admission of the dead on the example of air crashes of passenger aircraft TU-154-M and AIRBUS-A310. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2008;51(5):7–12. (In Russ).
  7. Kolkutin VV, Stepanov AA, Minaeva PV. The current state of the organizational component of the identification of the identity of unidentified victims in cases of emergencies. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2011;54(1):10–13. (In Russ).
  8. Shcherbakov VV, Shcherbakova EV. Identification of a person by the outcome of an event with mass human casualties. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2012;55(1):52–55. (In Russ).

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies