Use of various research methods in forensic practice to determine lifetime and age of injury: A review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

From the 19th century to the present, forensic physicians have been interested in the subject of damage formation prescription. After reviewing the literature on the problem of traumatic hemorrhage prescription, it is clear that there is no single position, approach to the study of this issue, or an unambiguous time frame that accurately determines the period from injury to the victim’s death. Forensic doctors in the 19th and 21st centuries initially focused on the macroscopic picture of the injury, followed by microscopic examination. When studying micropreparations, they are guided by the cellular composition of the hemorrhage, based on previously known data, their own experience and knowledge in this field, the brief circumstances of the incident (if any are indicated in the direction of forensic histological examination), and the victim’s age. Researchers have determined approximations and developed approximate time frames for the formation of damage throughout the years, now taking into account the above characteristics and the victim’s condition during and after the injury, with the acquired experience and accumulated knowledge. However, scientists have not come to a consensus. Medicine, achievements, progress, and perseverance of scientists strive forward, involving related sciences in the study of antiquity. As a result, methods, such as molecular genetics, biophysical, biochemical, and immunohistochemical, have found use, allowing researchers to analyze cellular composition and enzymatic and hormonal changes in damaged tissues. Ultrasound is one of the instrumental methods being developed. This problem remains completely unresolved when both laboratory and instrumental methods and their combination are used.

About the authors

Olga О. Frolova

Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute; Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga.frolog@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0785-6819
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Fedor Georgievich Zabozlaev

Federal Scientific and Practical Center of the FMBA of Russia; Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Scientific and Practical Center of the FMBA of Russia

Email: fzab@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7445-8319
SPIN-code: 3259-9332

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Vladimir A. Klevno

Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Email: vladimir.klevno@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5693-4054
SPIN-code: 2015-6548

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Shishkin IP. Travmaticheskie krovopodteki prizhiznennye i posmertnye [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 1895. 29 p. (In Russ).
  2. Berg OYu, Pikuleva MV, Isaev YuS. K voprosu o prizhiznennosti i davnosti prichineniya povrezhdenii pri mekhanicheskoi travme. Aktual’nye voprosy sudebnoi i klinicheskoi meditsiny. 2008(10):17–18. (In Russ).
  3. Pikuleva MV, Berg OYu, Isaev YuS. Osobennosti diagnostiki prizhiznennosti i davnosti prichineniya mekhanicheskikh povrezhdenii [Internet]. Aktual’nye voprosy sudebnoi meditsiny i ekspertnoi praktiki. 2008(14) [cited 2023 Apr 24]. Available from: http://journal.forens-lit.ru/node/42
  4. Ye MY, Xu D, Liu JC, et al. IL-6 and IL-20 as potential markers for vitality of skin contusion. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;59(8–12). doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.07.010
  5. Birincioğlu İ, Akbaba M, Alver A, et al. Determination of skin wound age by using cytokines as potential markers. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;44:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.08.011
  6. Kondo T, Ishida Y. Molecular pathology of wound healing. Forensic Sci Int. 2010. 203(1–3):93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.004
  7. Kondo T. Timing of skin wounds. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2007;9(2):109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.11.009
  8. Os’minkin VA, Kuznetsova AV, Vaseva MA. K voprosu patogistologicheskoi diagnostiki prizhiznennosti i davnosti prichineniya mekhanicheskikh povrezhdenii. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2004;4(1):36–37. (In Russ).
  9. Konoreva AK, Khasanyanova SV. Opredelenie prizhiznennosti i davnosti povrezhdenii na trupakh, izvlechennykh iz vodoemov. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2010(3–4). (In Russ).
  10. Taborelli A., Andreola S., Di Giancamillo A., et al. The use of the anti-Glycophorin A antibody in the detection of red blood cell residues in human soft tissue lesions decomposed in air and water: a pilot study. Med Sci Law. 2011;51(Suppl 1):S16–S19. doi: 10.1258/msl.2010.010107
  11. Baldari B, Vittorio S, Sessa F, et al. Forensic Application of Monoclonal Anti-Human Glycophorin A Antibody in Samples from Decomposed Bodies to Establish Vitality of the Injuries. A Preliminary Experimental Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(5):514. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050514
  12. Prangenberg J, Doberentz E, Witte A-L, Madea B. Aquaporin 1 and 3 as local vitality markers in mechanical and thermal skin injuries. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(5):1837–1842. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02588-x
  13. Sun T, Pan M, Zhu W, et al. Application of P/VB staining to identify antemortem injury in a decomposed cadaver. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00533-x (epub ahead of print).
  14. Amineva GM, Khalikov AA, Vavilov AY, Naydenova TV. Differential diagnosis cadaveric spots and bruising on a transform the putrid corpse of biophysical methods. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2017(2):58. (In Russ).
  15. Bertozzi G, Ferrara M, La Russa R, et al. Wound Vitality in Decomposed Bodies: New Frontiers Through Immunohistochemistry. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;(8):802841. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.802841
  16. Zagryadskaya AP, Chikun VI, Lysyi VI. O metodike issledovaniya oledenevshikh trupov. In: Informatsionnoe pis’mo RTsSME MZ RF №572/01-05 2001 May 24 “O metodike issledovaniya oledenevshikh trupov”. Мoscow; 2001. 6 p. (In Russ).
  17. Ten’kov AA, S’’edin MS Analiz sluchaev smerti ot pereokhlazhdeniya i izuchenie patomorfologicheskikh priznakov. Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-meditsinskoi ekspertizy. 2019(18):191–193. (In Russ).
  18. Shigeev VB., Shigeev S.V. Ocherki o kholodovoi travme. Мoscow: “August Borg” Printing House; 2016. 528 p. (In Russ).
  19. Kaplunovs’kii PA, Ol’khovs’kii VO, Gubіn MV, Pershina LV. Sudovo-medichna otsіnka osoblivostei prizhittєvikh ta posmertnikh ushkodzhen’ na promerzlikh trupakh. In: Aktual’nі pitannya sudovoї ekspertizi і krimіnalіstiki : zbіrnik materіalіv mіzhnarodnoї naukovo-praktichnoї konferentsії, prisvyachenoї 150-rіchchyu z dnya narodzhennya Zasluzhenogo profesora M.S. Bokarіusa. Kharkіv; 2019. P. 446–447. (In Ukrainian).
  20. Mityaeva NA. K voprosu o reaktsiyakh sosudistoi sistemy kak kriteriyakh prizhiznennoe povrezhdenii (soobshchenie I). Forensic Medical Expertise. 1965(4):20–23. (In Russ).
  21. Mityaeva NA. K voprosu o reaktsiyakh sosudistoi sistemy kak kriteriyakh prizhiznennosti povrezhdenii (soobshchenie II). Forensic Medical Expertise. 1966(2):3–7. (In Russ).
  22. Kireeva EA. Sudebno-meditsinskoe opredelenie davnosti perelomov reber [abstract of the dissertation]. Moscow; 2008. 22 p. (In Russ).
  23. Bikhert EA, Demchuk ON, Vlasyuk IV. K voprosu posmertnogo khemotaksisa leikotsitov. Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-meditsinskoi ekspertizy. 2018(17):47–50. (In Russ).
  24. Chepurnenko MN, Chepurnenko DA. Сharacteristics of reactive changes of cells and tissues in the wounded process. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2020(5):67. (In Russ).
  25. Bogomolov DV, Bogomolova IN, Fetisov VA, Kireeva EA. Sudebno-meditsinskaya diagnostika davnosti povrezhdenii myagkikh tkanei i vnutrennikh organov gistologicheskimi metodami. Мoscow: RIO FGU RTsSME of Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia; 2010. 24 p. P. 9. (In Russ).
  26. Yankovskii VE, Sarkisyan BA, Malinina EI. Gistologicheskoe opredelenie prizhiznennosti i davnosti mekhanicheskikh povrezhdenii (metodicheskie rekomendatsii). Barnaul, 2008. 20 p. (In Russ).
  27. Lyskova SV. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po “Opredeleniyu davnosti obrazovaniya mekhanicheskikh povrezhdenii”. Kursk: OBUZ “Byuro SME” of Health Committee of the Kursk region; 2014. 20 p. (In Russ).
  28. Belikov VK, Mazurenko MD. Sudebno-meditsinskaya diagnostika prizhiznennosti i davnosti mekhanicheskikh povrezhdenii [letter]. Мoscow: Ministry of Health of RSFSR, 1990. 17 p. (In Russ).
  29. Frolova IA., Asmolova ND., Nazarova RA. Opredelenie davnosti povrezhdeniya myagkikh tkanei pri mekhanicheskoi travme po morfologicheskim kriteriyam [information letter]. Мoscow, 2007. (In Russ).
  30. Kontsevich IA, Kidraliev SK, Gaibov AG. Sovremennoe sostoyanie voprosa sudebno-meditsinskoi diagnostiki prizhiznennosti i davnosti prichineniya mekhanicheskoi travmy (Obzor literatury). Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertisa. 1977(3):18–22. (In Russ).
  31. Khalikov AA, Vavilov AJu. About necessity of system principles approaching to the problem of injuries age definition. Medical Examination Problems. 2004(4)7–9. (In Russ).
  32. Khalikov AA, Viter VI. Definition of prescription of bruises from positions of observance of principles of the system approch. Medical Examination Problems. 2009(2–3):8–10. (In Russ).
  33. Belyanin VL. Morfodinamika vospalitel’nogo protsessa [Internet] [cited 2022 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.forens-med.ru/book.php?id=407
  34. Permyakov AV, Viter VI, Nevolin NI. Sudebno-meditsinskaya gistologiya. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Izhevsk; Ekaterinburg: Ekspertiza; 2003. 214 p. (In Russ).
  35. Gridasov EV, Vinogradov OM. K voprosu ekspertnoi otsenki morfodinamiki posttravmaticheskikh reaktivnykh izmenenii. In: Proceedings of the VI Russian Congress of Forensic Physicians. Мoscow; Tyumen; 2005. P. 77–78. (In Russ).
  36. Novoselov VP, Savchenko SV, Sakovchuk OA, Gritsinger VA. Osobennosti reaktivnykh izmenenii pri obrazovanii povrezhdenii v myagkikh tkanyakh i vnutrennikh organakh. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2013(6). (In Russ).
  37. Frolova IA. Znachenie gistologicheskogo metoda issledovaniya v opredelenii davnosti povrezhdeniya myagkikh tkanei. Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2016;2(2):143–144. (In Russ).
  38. Spiridonov VA, Khromova AM, Aleksandrova LG, Bibisheva LR, Nasybullina EL. Gistologicheskie kriterii opredeleniya davnosti povrezhdeniya myagkikh tkanei pri mekhanicheskoi travme: uchebnoe posobie dlya vrachei-ordinatorov po spetsial’nosti 31.08.10 “Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza”. Kazan: Kazan State Medical University, 2019. 41 p. (In Russ).
  39. Seitova RR. Znachenie mikroskopicheskikh morfologicheskikh priznakov rezorbtsii krovoizliyanii v diagnostike davnosti povrezhdenii myagkikh tkanei i vnutrennikh organov. Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2019;5(15)85–86. (In Russ).
  40. Saenko AV. Otsenka sostoyaniya fibrina dlya opredeleniya davnosti mekhanicheskoi travmy. In: Aktual’nye voprosy teorii i praktiki sudebnoi meditsiny. Мoscow; 1998. P. 71–72. (In Russ).
  41. Karpenko TA. Gistologicheskaya otsenka davnosti ushiblennykh ran razlichnoi lokalizatsii po sostoyaniyu fibrina v sochetanii s kletochnymi reaktsiyami. Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-meditsinskoi ekspertizy. Khabarovsk; 2018(17):117–119. (In Russ).
  42. Khismatullin RR, Shakirova AZ, Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Age-Dependent Differential Staining of Fibrin in Blood Clots and Thrombi. BioNanoScience. 2020;10(5):370–374. doi: 10.1007/s12668-019-00701-4
  43. Zerbino DD, Lukasevich LL. Disseminirovannoe vnutrisosudistoe svertyvanie krovi: fakty i kontseptsii. Мoscow; 1989. 225 p. (In Russ).
  44. Godetskaya MD, Abramova TG. Modifikatsiya okraski OKG dlya opredeleniya davnosti krovoizliyanii v sluchayakh cherepno-mozgovoi travmy (po materialam gistologicheskogo otdeleniya). In: Proceedings of the XIII Plenum of the Russian Society of Forensic Physicians. Мoscow, 1998. P. 39–40. (In Russ).
  45. Kidraliev SK. Gistokhimicheskie izmeneniya nekotorykh degidrogenaz i NAD-diaforazy v eksperimental’nykh povrezhdeniyakh razlichnoi davnosti. Sudebno-meditsinskii ekspert. 1977(3);22–25. (In Russ).
  46. De Simone S, Giacani E, Bosco MA, et al. The Role of miRNAs as New Molecular Biomarkers for Dating the Age of Wound Production: A Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;8:803067. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.803067
  47. Manetti AC, Maiese A, Baronti A, et al. MiRNAs as New Tools in Lesion Vitality Evaluation: A Systematic Review and Their Forensic Applications. Biomedicines. 2021;9(11):1731. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111731
  48. Ibraheem S, Ali M, Basyouni H. Histological and miRNAs postmortem changes in incisional wound. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2019;9(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41935-019-0141-7
  49. He JT, Huang HY, Qu D, et al. CXCL1 and CXCR2 as potential markers for vital reactions in skin contusions. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018;14(2):174–179. doi: 10.1007/s12024-018-9969-7
  50. Murase T, Shinba Y, Mitsuma M, et al. Wound age estimation based on chronological changes in chitinase 3-like protein 1 expression. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022;59:102128. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102128
  51. Kimura A, Ishida Y, Nosaka M, et al. Autophagy in skin wounds: a novel marker for vital reactions. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(3):537–541. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1168-4
  52. Ishida Y, Nosaka M, Kondo T. Bone Marrow-Derived Cells and Wound Age Estimation. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:822572. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.822572
  53. Mansueto G, Feola A, Zangani P, et al. A Clue on the Skin: A Systematic Review on Immunohistochemical Analyses of the Ligature Mark. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042035
  54. Li N, Du Q, Bai R, Sun J. Vitality and wound-age estimation in forensic pathology: review and future prospects. Forensic Sci Res. 2018;5(1):15–24. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1445441
  55. Niedecker A, Huhn R, Ritz-Timme S, Mayer F. Complex challenges of estimating the age and vitality of muscle wounds: a study with matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors on animal and human tissue samples. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(5):1843–1853. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02563-6
  56. Casse JM, Martrille L, Vignaud JM, Gauchotte G. Skin wounds vitality markers in forensic pathology: An updated review. Med Sci Law. 2016;56(2):128–137. doi: 10.1177/0025802415590175
  57. Gauchotte G, Martrille L, Plénat F, Vignaud JM. Les marqueurs de vitalité des blessures en pathologie médicolégale. Ann Pathol. 2013;33(2):93–101. (In French). doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2013.02.006
  58. Gauchotte G, Bochnakian A, Campoli P, et al. Myeloperoxydase and CD15 With Glycophorin C Double Staining in the Evaluation of Skin Wound Vitality in Forensic Practice. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:910093. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.910093
  59. Khalaf AA, Hassanen EI, Zaki AR, Tohamy AF, Ibrahim MA. Histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular studies for determination of wound age and vitality in rats. Int Wound J. 2019;16(6):1416–1425. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13206
  60. Khromova AM, Kalinin YuP. Ispol’zovanie immunogistotsitokhimii dlya tselei sudebnoi meditsiny (predvaritel’noe soobshchenie). Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2003(2):34–36. (In Russ).
  61. Novoselov VP, Savchenko SV, Celuyeva EA. Using immune histocytochemistry in cytologic studies. The Siberian Medical Journal. 2008;1(1):25–27. (In Russ).
  62. Bogomolov DV, Bogomolova IN, Zavalishina LE, et al. The prospects for the application of the immunohistochemical methods for the establishment of intravitality and prescription of the mechanical injuries in forensic medical practice. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2014;57(5):35–39. (In Russ).
  63. Bogomolov DV, Kochoyan AL, Martem’yanova AA. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya immunogistokhimicheskogo metoda issledovaniya v sudebno-meditsinskoi praktike. NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. 2014(1)61–69. (In Russ).
  64. Fedulova MV, Kovalev AV, Zavalishina LE, Bogomolov DV, Kupriyanov DD. Immunogistokhimicheskoe issledovanie v sudebno-meditsinskoi gistologii: uchebnoe posobie, 2022. 36 p. P. 33. (In Russ).
  65. Khalikov A.A., Vavilov A.Yu. Diagnostika davnosti mekhanicheskoi travmy v sudebnoi meditsine biofizicheskimi sposobami. Izhevsk: Ekspertiza; 2007. 159 p. (In Russ).
  66. Khalikov AA, Viter VI. Zavisimost’ impedansometricheskikh pokazatelei ot individual’nykh kharakteristik trupa v aspekte adaptivnogo podkhoda k ikh uchetu. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;6(3):99–104. (In Russ).
  67. Khalikov AA, Viter VI. Znachenie biofizicheskikh issledovanii v probleme diagnostiki davnosti mekhanicheskoi travmy. Meditsinskaya ekspertiza i pravo. 2011(3):12–15. (In Russ).
  68. Khalikov AA, Markelova NM, Vavilov AYu. Kompleksnoe morfobiofizicheskoe opredelenie davnosti krovopodtekov u zhivykh lits. Morphological Newsletter. 2008(3–4):294–297. (In Russ).
  69. Khalikov AA, Chernova RB, Enikeev DA, Murzabaev KhKh. Opredelenie davnosti krovopodteka na mertvom tele kompleksnym biofizicheskim sposobom. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2008. (2, Suppl.):80–85. (In Russ).
  70. Khalikov AA, Vavilov AYu, Enikeev DA. Osobennosti ucheta individual’nykh kharakteristik organizma pri ustanovlenii davnosti prichine krovopodtekov biofizicheskimi metodami. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2007;2(2)72–76. (In Russ).
  71. Khalikov AA, Vavilov AYu, Khasanyanov SV. Sostoyanie i perspektivy problemy opredeleniya prizhiznennosti i davnosti mekhanicheskikh povrezhdenii. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2005(1):36–40. (In Russ).
  72. Khalikov AA, Vavilov AYu. Kharakteristika i perspektivy biofizicheskikh metodov pri opredelenii davnosti krovopodtekov u zhivykh lits. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2005(4):11–13. (In Russ).
  73. Khalikov AA, Viter VI. Opredelenie davnosti krovopodtekov s pozitsii soblyudeniya printsipov sistemnogo podkhoda. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2009(2–3):8–10. (In Russ).
  74. Khalikov AA, Markelova NM, Vavilov AYu. Morfobiofizicheskaya diagnostika davnosti prichineniya krovopodtekov. Morphological Newsletter. 2008. № 3–4. С. 223–225. (In Russ).
  75. Khalikov AA, Viter VI. Aktual’nost’ i sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy diagnostiki davnosti telesnykh povrezhdenii biofizicheskimi metodami issledovaniya. Meditsinskaya ekspertiza i pravo. 2011(2):22–25. (In Russ).
  76. Khalikov AA, Viter VI. Vliyanie faktorov individual’nosti ob’’ekta issledovaniya na pokazateli biofizicheskikh protsessov v travmirovannykh tkanyakh tela cheloveka. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;6(2):369–372. (In Russ).
  77. Khalikov AA. Diagnostika i znachenie davnosti mekhanicheskoi travmy v klinike i sudebnoi meditsine na primere travm pecheni, gematom selezenki i krovopodtekov kozhi [dissertation]. Ufa, 2013. 40 p. (In Russ).
  78. Khalikov AA, Sharafutdinov AN, Vavilov AYu. Opredelenie udel’noi teploemkosti biologicheskikh tkanei. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;6(5):137–139. (In Russ).
  79. Khalikov AA, Enikeev DA, Sharafutdinov AN. Sovremennoe sostoyanie voprosa diagnostiki davnosti mekhanicheskoi travmy. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;6(5):154–159. (In Russ).
  80. Babushkina KA, Markelova NM, Khalikov AA. Termodinamika krovopodtekov v rannem postmortal’nom periode. Izhevsk; Ufa; Cheboksary; 2008. 84 p. (In Russ).
  81. Akbashev VA., Viter VI. Teplofizicheskie svoistva krovopodtekov kak diagnosticheskii kriterii prizhiznennosti i davnosti ikh prichineniya. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2002;2(3):37–39. (In Russ).
  82. Akbashev VA, Vavilov AYu, Ledyankina I.A. Ob’’ektivizatsiya otsenki krovopodtekov metodom opredeleniya koeffitsienta ikh teploprovodimosti. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2001;1(1):35–38. (In Russ).
  83. Pashinyan GA, Prutovykh VV. Ispol’zovanie metoda khemilyuminestsentsii dlya opredeleniya prizhiznennosti i davnosti mekhanicheskoi travmy skeletnykh myshts. Forensic Medical Expertise. 1978(2):15–17. (In Russ).
  84. Kononova SA. Diagnostika davnosti telesnykh povrezhdenii beskontaktnym termometricheskim metodom [abstract of the dissertation]. Мoscow; 2010. 150 p.
  85. Klyushkin IV, Kharin GM, Gazizyanova RM. Prizhiznennoe opredelenie davnosti krovopodtekov sovremennymi sposobami meditsinskoi vizualizatsii. Advances in current natural sciences. 2004(12):52–53. (In Russ).
  86. Gazizyanova RM. Ispol’zovanie kombinirovannykh metodov ul’trazvukovogo issledovaniya v diagnostike posttravmaticheskikh krovoizliyanii [abstract of the dissertation]. Kazan, 2013. 23 p. (In Russ).
  87. Evstafev A.A. Opredelenie davnosti proiskhozhdeniya krovopodtekov elektrotermometricheskim metodom [abstract of the dissertation]. Izhevsk, 2001. 24 p. (In Russ).
  88. Vinay J, Harish S, Mangala GSR, Hugar BS. A Study on Postmortem Wound Dating by Gross and Histopathological Examination of Abrasions. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2017;38(2):167–173. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000314
  89. Schneider CP, Schwacha MG, Chaudry IH. Influence of gender and age on T-cell responses in a murine model of trauma-hemorrhage: differences between circulating and tissue-fixed cells. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(3):826–833. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00898.2005
  90. Bösch F, Angele MK, Chaudry IH. Gender differences in trauma, shock and sepsis. Mil Med Res. 2018;5(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40779-018-0182-5
  91. Serre-Miranda C, Roque S, Barreira-Silva P, et al. Age-Related Sexual Dimorphism on the Longitudinal Progression of Blood Immune Cells in BALB/cByJ Mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022;77(5):883–891. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab330
  92. Greiffenstein P, Mathis KW, Stouwe CV, Molina PE. Alcohol binge before trauma/hemorrhage impairs integrity of host defense mechanisms during recovery. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(4):704–715. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00355.x
  93. Wagner N, Franz N, Dieteren S, et al. Acute Alcohol Binge Deteriorates Metabolic and Respiratory Compensation Capability After Blunt Chest Trauma Followed by Hemorrhagic Shock — A New Research Model. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41(9):1559–1567. doi: 10.1111/acer.13446
  94. Franz N, Dieteren S, Köhler K, et al. Alcohol Binge Reduces Systemic Leukocyte Activation and Pulmonary PMN Infiltration After Blunt Chest Trauma and Hemorrhagic Shock. Inflammation. 2019;42(2):690–701. doi: 10.1007/s10753-018-0927-z
  95. Haag F, Janicova A, Xu B, et al. Reduced phagocytosis, ROS production and enhanced apoptosis of leukocytes upon alcohol drinking in healthy volunteers. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(4):2689–2699. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01643-x
  96. Savchenko SV. Patho-morphologic research in medico-legal practice at the present stage. Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2015;4(2):21–24. (In Russ).

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies