Factors Preventing in-service University English Language Teachers from Becoming Action Researchers in Pakistan

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Research suggests that TR enables classroom teachers to address their classroom-specific problems without having to rely too heavily on published research. However, despite the fact that TR narratives of language teachers have increased lately, there is still need for studies investigating the perceptions of university English language (EL) teachers about TR, and exploring the factors affecting their engagement with TR in culturally diverse contexts. The current study was designed to explore the perceptions of university EL practitioners about the factors that inhibit or encourage them to engage in TR in a university context in Pakistan. Data were obtained from fifteen EL teachers from four public sector universities through semi-structured interviews. Results show that teachers appeared to possess only simplistic knowledge of research as an activity aimed at finding something new. While a majority admitted to have done no research, even the engagement of others who claimed to have done some research seemed sporadic and less than systematic. The main factors responsible for teachers’ dis-engagement from TR included academic culture, management’s attitude, power relations between senior and junior faculty, workload, lack of monetary benefits, and large classes. A number of implications have also been discussed.

Авторлар туралы

Hassan Syed

Sukkur IBA University

Email: hassan.ali@iba-suk.edu.pk
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9561-0810

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 61-81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v24i2.139
  2. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353-366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00310.x
  3. Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139-147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl053
  4. Barkhuizen, B., Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., & Wyatt, M. (2018). Empowering teacher researchers, empowering learners. IATEFL.
  5. Borg, S. (2006). Conditions for teacher research. English Language Forum, 6, 22-27.
  6. Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731-747. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170
  7. Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers' conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358-388. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007
  8. Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators' research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 347-356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011
  9. Borg, S., & Sanchez, H. S. (2015). Key issues in doing and supporting language teacher research. In S. Borg, & H. S. Sanchez, International Perspectives on Teacher Research (pp. 1-12). Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Bughio, F. A. (2013). Improving English language teaching in large classes at.
  11. University level in Pakistan [Unpublished doctoral dissertationб University of Sussex].http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/45170.
  12. Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(2), 57-74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002661
  13. Christenson, M., Slutsky, R., Bendau, S., Covert, J., Dyer, J., Risko, G., & Johnston, M. (2002). The rocky road of teachers becoming action researchers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 259-272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00068-3
  14. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1992). Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront? American Journal of Education, 100(3), 298-324.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1085491.
  15. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L., (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.
  16. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 19-36.
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  18. Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2000). Teachers' Perspectives on Educational Research: Knowledge and context. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 26(2), 167-182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470050127081
  19. Gao, X., & Chow, A. (2012). Primary school English teachers' research engagement. ELT Journal, 66(2), 224-232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr046
  20. Halai, N. (2011). How teachers become action researchers in Pakistan: Emerging patterns from a qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 201-214.
  21. Halai, A. (2015). Teacher education continuum: A case for continuing professional development. In A. Rashid, & I. Muzaffar's ‘Educational Crisis and Reform: Perspectives from South Asia' (pp. 347-381). Oxford University Press.
  22. Mackay, J., Birello, M., & Xerri, D. (2018). ELT research in action: Bridging the gap between research and classroom practice. IATEFL.
  23. Kasi, F. (2010). Collaborative action research: An alternative model for EFL for teacher professional development in Pakistan. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12(3), 98-117.
  24. Khan, S., Shah, S. M., & Khan, T. (2018). An investigation of attitudes towards the research activities of university teachers. Bulletin of Educational Research, 40(1), 215-230.
  25. Khurram, B. A. (2018). Promoting learner engagement in a large university-Level ESL class in Pakistan. In K. Kuchah & F. Shamim's (Eds.), International perspectives on teaching English in difficult circumstances: Contexts, challenges and possibilities' (pp. 73-88). Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. Kirkwood, M., & Christie, D. (2006). The role of teacher research in continuing professional development. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(4), 429-448. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00355.x
  27. Levkina, M. (2018). Teaching pronunciation through tasks: Myth or reality? In J. Mackay, M. Birello, & D. Xerri,'s (Eds.), ELT in Action: Bridging the gap between research and classroom practice (pp. 51-54). IATEFL.
  28. Macaro, E. (2003). Second language teachers as a second language classroom researchers. Language Learning Journal, 27, 43-51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730385200071
  29. Magos, K. (2012). But I cannot do research: action-research and early childhood teachers. A case study from Greece. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 331-343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629839
  30. McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 33-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00383.x
  31. Moore, S. (2011). Cambodian English teachers' conceptions of and engagement with research.http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=Cambodian+English+Teachers%E2%80%99+Conceptions+of+and+Engagement+with&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5.
  32. Nadeem, M. (2011). Re-searching research culture at higher education. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 5(1), 41 -52.
  33. Newby, P. (2010). Research Methods for Education. Pearson Education Limited.
  34. Saglam, A. L. G., & Dikilitas, K. (2019). Stories by teacher researchers in an online research community. IATEFL.
  35. Sanchez, H., & Borg, S. (2015). Teacher research: Looking back and moving forward. In S. Borg & H. S. Sanchez (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 185-193). Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. Sarwar, Z. (2001). Innovations in large classes in Pakistan. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 497-500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3588033
  37. Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. E. (2010). Research-led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 641-651. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489236
  38. Shkedi, A. (1998). Teachers' attitudes towards research: A challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559-577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236467
  39. Slimani-Rolls, A. (2018). Using exploratory practice to develop teacher research. In S. Etherington & M. Daubney's (Eds.), Developing as EFL researcher: Stories from the Field (pp. 29-34). IATEFL.
  40. Suzuki, N. (2018). How do teacher questions affect students' L2 task performance in EFL classrooms? In J. Mackay, M. Birello & D. Xerri,'s (Eds.), ELT in Action: Bridging the gap between research and classroom practice (pp. 55-60). IATEFL.
  41. Taylor, J. (2007). The teaching-research nexus: A model for institutional management. Higher Education, 54(6), 867-884. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9029-1
  42. Tien, F. F. (2000). To what degree does the desire for promotion motivate faculty to perform research? Testing the expectancy theory. Research in Higher Education, 41(6), 723-752.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007020721531.
  43. Tuyan, S. E. (2018). On the way to achieve sustainability: An evaluative look at a three-year action research program in an ELT context. In G. Barkhuizen, A. Burns, K. Dikilitaş & M. Wyatt's (Eds.), Empowering teacher researchers, empowering learners (pp. 19-28). IATEFL.
  44. Xie, J. (2015). Learning to do teacher research independently: Challenges and solutions. In S. Borg & H. S. Sanchez's (Eds.), International Perspectives on Teacher Research (pp. 47-56). Palgrave Macmillan.
  45. Worrall, N. (2004). Trying to build a research culture in a school: Trying to find the right questions to ask. Teacher Development, 8(2-3), 137-148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136645304002000020228
  46. Wyatt, M. (2011). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 64(4), 417-425. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq074

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.