Juridical thinking and evolution of semiotical remedies of constructing of law reality

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers the phenomenon of legal thinking as an independent kind of thinking, whose main goal is the construction of legal reality. The author believes that legal thinking performs three most important functions: firstly, it forms the matter of legal reality formed by atomic facts, secondly, it establishes the interconnection of facts in the logical and cultural-historical space of reality and, thirdly, it consolidates facts and relations between them in various sign forms developed in the process of cognitive activity of individuals. As shown in the work, the establishment of a logical relationship between its static (constructive) characteristics and evolutionary dynamics is of particular importance in terms of theoretical understanding of legal reality. According to the author, it is the activity of legal thinking that creates the prerequisites for the evolution of law and legal reality in the historical dimension. Cognitive and other creative activity of legal thinking creates those symbolic forms in which the interrelation of facts and factual complexes takes on an external expression. Moreover, in the course of evolution there is a complication of such forms, their acquisition of universality and validity.

The work demonstrated that the most important regularity of legal evolution is the formation on the basis of specific situations of legal communication of subjective rights, which in the future, as they are typified and distributed to an increasingly wide range of individuals, are transformed into legal norms. This regularity gets its justification and confirmation both on general scientific material and on the example of legal science, which acts as the highest level of organization of legal thinking. The consequence of the processes under consideration, according to the author, is the formation of a common legal reality space for all individuals, which is a single field of intersubjective communications.

About the authors

Nikolay V. Razuvaev

North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA

Author for correspondence.
Email: nrasuvaev@yandex.ru

PhD in Law, Doctor of Law, Head of the Chair of Civil and Labour Law 

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg

References

  1. Averincev S.S. Ritorika i istoki evropejskoj literaturnoj tradicii. Moscow: Nauka, 1996 [Averintsev S.S. Rhetoric and the origins of the European literary tradition. Moscow: Science, 1996].
  2. Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. V 2 t. T. II. Moscow: YUrid. lit., 1982 [Alekseev S.S. General theory of law. In 2 t. T. II. Moscow: Jurid. lit., 1982].
  3. Arnol’d V.I. Teoriya katastrof // Itogi nauki i tekhniki. Ser.: Sovremennye problemy matematiki. Fundamental’nye napravleniya, 1986. T 5 [Arnold V.I. Catastrophe Theory // The Results of Science and Technics. Ser.: Modern problems of mathematics. Fundamental directions, 1986. Vol. 5].
  4. Batiev L.V. Politicheskie i pravovye ucheniya XVII veka. Saint Petersburg: Izd. R. Aslanova Yuridicheskij centr Press, 2006 [Batiev L.V. Political and legal teachings of the XVII century. Saint Petersburg: R. Aslanov Publisher Legal Center Press, 2006].
  5. Berger P., Lukman T. Social’noe konstruirovanie znaniya: Traktat po sociologii znaniya. Moscow: Academia-centr; Medium, 1995 [Berger P., Luckman T. Social construction of knowledge: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Moscow: Academia-center; Medium, 1995].
  6. Berman G.Dzh. Zapadnaya tradiciya prava: epoha formirovaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, Izdat. gruppa Infra-M — Norma, 1998 [Berman G.J. Western tradition of law: the era of formation. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University, Infra-M group — Norma, 1998].
  7. Blumfild L. YAzyk. Izd. 2-e, stereotip. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2002 [Bloomfield L. Language. Ed. 2nd, stereotype. Moscow: URSS editorial, 2002].
  8. Bogdanova E. V. O nekotoryh aspektah izucheniya termina idiolekt v otechestvennoj i zapadnoj lingvistike // Vestnik LGU im. A. S. Pushkina. 2009. T. 1. No 4. S. 100–108 [Bogdanova E. V. On some aspects of the study of the term idiolect in domestic and Western linguistics // Bulletin of the Leningrad State University of A.S. Pushkin. 2009. T. 1. No. 4. P. 100-108].
  9. Burd’e P. Ot «korolevskogo doma» k gosudarstvennomu interesu: model’ proiskhozhdeniya byurokraticheskogo polya // Burd’e P. Sociologiya social’nogo prostranstva. Moscow: Institut eksperimental’noj sociologii; Saint Petersburg: Aletejya, 2005 [Bourdieu P. From the «royal house» to state interest: a model of the origin of the bureaucratic field // Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; Saint Petersburg: Aletheia, 2005].
  10. Byuler K. Teoriya yazyka. Reprezentativnaya funkciya yazyka. Moscow: Progress, 2002 [Buhler K. Theory of Language. Representative function of language. Moscow: Progress, 2002].
  11. Verlinskij A.L. Antichnye ucheniya o vozniknovenii yazyka. Saint Petersburg: Izd. SPbGU, 2006 [Verlinsky A.L. Antique teachings on the emergence of language. Saint Petersburg: Publ. SPbSU, 2006].
  12. Vinogradov P.G. Ocherki po teorii prava. Moscow: Tip. t-va A. A. Levenson, 1915 [Vinogradov P.G. Essays on the theory of law. Moscow: Press by Partnership of A.A. Levenson, 1915].
  13. Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat // Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie raboty. CH. I. Moscow: Gnozis, 1994 [Wittgenstein L. Logical and philosophical treatise // Wittgenstein L. Philosophical works. Part I. Moscow: Gnosis, 1994].
  14. Voplenko N.N. Istochniki i formy prava. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2004 [Voplenko N.N. Sources and forms of law. Volgograd: VolSU Publishing House, 2004].
  15. Garsia Garrido M.H. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: kazusy, iski, instituty. Moscow: Statut, 2005 [Garcia Garrido M. J. Roman private law: cases, lawsuits, institutions. Moscow: Statute, 2005].
  16. Gluhareva L.I. Dogma prava i dogmatichnost’ yuridicheskogo myshleniya // Vestnik RGGU. Ser.: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo. 2013. No. 19(120) [Glukhareva L.I. Dogma of law and the dogma of legal thinking // Bulletin of the Russian State Humanitarian University. Ser.: Economics. Control. Right, 2013. No. 19(120)].
  17. Gobbs T. Osnovy filosofii // Gobbs T. Soch. V 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Mysl’, 1989 [Hobbes T. Fundamentals of philosophy // Hobbes T. Soch. In 2 vols. T. 1. Moscow: Thought, 1989].
  18. Grimm D. D. K voprosu o ponyatii i istochnike obyazatel’nosti yuridicheskih norm // Zhurnal ministerstva yusticii. 1896. No 6 [Grimm D.D. On the concept and source of binding legal norms // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1896. No. 6].
  19. Gumbol’dt V. O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskih yazykov i ego vliyanii na duhovnoe razvitie chelovechestva // Gumbol’dt V. Izbr. trudy po yazykoznaniyu. Moscow: Progress, 1984 [Humboldt V. On the difference in the structure of human languages and its influence on the spiritual development of mankind // Humboldt V. Elect. works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 1984].
  20. Gusserl’ E. Kartezianskie meditacii. Moscow: Akademich. proekt, 2010 [Husserl E. Cartesian meditations. Moscow: Academic. project, 2010].
  21. Gusserl’ E. Krizis evropejskih nauk i transcendental’naya fenomenologiya. Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuyu filosofiyu // Gusserl’ E. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka. Novocherkassk: Saguna, 1994 [Husserl E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Introduction to phenomenological philosophy // Husserl E. Philosophy as a rigorous science. Novocherkassk: Saguna, 1994].
  22. Dekart R. Geometriya. Moscow: GONTI, 1938 [Descartes R. Geometry. Moscow: GONTI, 1938].
  23. Dekart R. Rassuzhdenie o metode, chtoby verno napravlyat’ svoj razum i otyskivat’ istinu v naukah // Dekart R. Soch. V. 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Mysl, 1989. [Descartes R. Reasoning about a method to correctly direct your mind and seek truth in the sciences // Descartes R. Soch. In 2 vols. T. 1. Moscow: Thought, 1989].
  24. Zanin S.V. Rozhdenie uchenij o estestvennom prave v epohu Novogo vremeni: Ioann Al’tuzij i Grocij // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2013. No. 14. S. 24-27 [Zanin S. V. The birth of the doctrine of natural law in the era of the New Age: John Altusius and Grotius // History of State and Law. 2013. No. 14. P. 24-27].
  25. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Lingvistika i gumanitarnye problemy semiotiki // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i yazyka. 1968. T. XXVII. Vyp. 3 [Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Linguistics and humanitarian problems of semiotics // Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Ser. literature and language. 1968. T. XXVII. Vol. 3].
  26. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Nechet i chet: Asimmetriya mozga i dinamika znakovyh sistem // Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Izbr. trudy po semiotike i istorii kul’tury. T. I. Moscow: Yazyki russkoj kul’tury, 1999 [Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Odd and even: Asymmetry of the brain and dynamics of sign systems // Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Collected works on semiotics and cultural history. T. I. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture, 1999].
  27. Kazimirchuk V.P. Social’nyj mekhanizm dejstviya prava // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. 1970. No 10. S. 37–44 [Kazimirchuk V.P. The social mechanism of law activity // Soviet state and law, 1970. No. 10. P. 37-44].
  28. Kasatkin A.A. Istoriya yazyka i istoriya prava (na materiale nekotoryh romanskih yazykov) // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i yazyka. 1964. T. XXIII. Vyp. 2. S. 113-124 [Kasatkin A. A. The history of language and the history of law (based on some Romance languages) // Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Ser. literature and language, 1964. T. XXIII. Vol. 2, pp. 113-124].
  29. Klejn F. Elementarnaya matematika s tochki zreniya vysshej. T. 1. Moscow: Nauka, 1987 [Klein F. Elementary mathematics from the point of view of higher. T. 1. Moscow: Science, 1987].
  30. Koseriu E. Sinhroniya, diahroniya i istoriya: Problema yazykovogo izmeneniya. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001 [Coseriu E. Synchrony, diachrony and history: The problem of language change. Moscow: URSS editorial, 2001].
  31. Kotlyar I.A. Jus commune kak srednevekovaya model’ obshcheevropejskogo pravoporyadka (XI–XIV veka). Avtoref. diss. … k. yu .n. M., 2011 [Kotlyar I. A. Jus commune as a medieval model of the pan-European rule of law (XI–XIV centuries). Abstract of diss. ... Ph.D in Law. Moscow, 2011].
  32. Kotlyar I.A. Gosudar’ kak institut evropejskogo srednevekovogo jus commune // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11: Pravo, 2011. No 4 [Kotlyar I. A. Sovereign as an institution of European medieval jus commune // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 11: Right, 2011. No. 4].
  33. Kotlyar I.A. Ponyatie «jus commune» v evropejskoj pravovoj tradicii // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11: Pravo, 2009. No. 5. P. 89-100. [Kotlyar I. A. The concept of «jus commune» in the European legal tradition // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 11: Right, 2009. No. 5. P. 89-100].
  34. Kubyshkin E.I. Nelinejnaya algebra prostranstva-vremeni. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom Librokom, 2009 [Kubyshkin E.I. Nonlinear space-time algebra. Moscow: Book house Librokom, 2009].
  35. Lejst O.E. Sushchnost’ prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava. Moscow: Zercalo, 2002 [Leist O.E. The essence of law. Problems of theory and philosophy of law. Moscow: Mirror, 2002].
  36. Lotman Yu.M., Uspenskij B.A. O semioticheskom mekhanizme kul’tury // Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. Saint Petersburg: «Iskusstvo-SPb.», 2000 [Lotman Yu.M., Uspensky B.A. On the semiotic mechanism of culture // Lotman Yu. M. Semiosphere. Saint Petersburg: Art-SPb, 2000].
  37. Lukach D.K ontologii obshchestvennogo bytiya. Prolegomeny. Moscow: Progress, 1991 [Lukach D. On the ontology of social being. Prolegomens. Moscow: Progress, 1991].
  38. Lyubitenko D.Yu. Pravovaya doktrina v sisteme istochnikov rossijskogo prava // Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2010. No. 4 [Lyubitenko D.Yu. Legal doctrine in the system of sources of Russian law // Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs. 2010. No. 4].
  39. Malinovskij A.A. Rimskaya yurisprudenciya: metodologiya i didaktika // Rossijskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka. 2017. No. 4(100) [Malinovsky A.A. Roman jurisprudence: methodology and didactics // Russian law: education, practice, science. 2017. No. 4(100)].
  40. Mal’ko A.V., Hramov D.V. Sistema netradicionnyh istochnikov rossijskogo chastnogo prava // Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. 2010. No. 1 [Malko A.V., Khramov D.V. The system of non-traditional sources of Russian private law // Leningrad Journal of Law. 2010. No. 1].
  41. Mamardashvili M.K. Klassicheskij i neklassicheskij idealy racional’nosti. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-Attikus, 2010 [Mamardashvili M.K. Classical and non-classical ideals of rationality. Saint Petersburg: ABC-Atticus, 2010].
  42. Manin Yu.I., Panchishkin A.A. Vvedenie v teoriyu chisel // Itogi nauki i tekhniki. Ser.: Sovremennye problemy matematiki. Fundamental’nye napravleniya, 1990. T. 49 [Manin Yu.I., Panchishkin A.A. Introduction to number theory // The Results of Science and Technics. Ser.: Modern problems of mathematics. Fundamental directions. 1990. V. 49].
  43. Marej A.V. K osmysleniyu recepcii rimskogo prava: formirovanie jus commune v Zapadnoj Evrope XII–XIV vv. // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2012. No. 5. S. 96-102 [Marey A.V. On the comprehension of the reception of Roman law: the formation of jus commune in Western Europe XII–XIV centuries // State and law. 2012. No. 5. P. 96-102].
  44. Marr N.Ya. Yazyk // Marr N.Ya. Osnovnye voprosy yazykoznaniya. Moscow: Socekgiz, 1935 [Marr N.Ya. Language // Marr N. Ya. Basic questions of linguistics. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1935].
  45. Martin-Lyof P. Ocherki po konstruktivnoj matematike. Moscow: Mir, 1975 [Martin-Löf P. Essays on constructive mathematics. Moscow: World, 1975].
  46. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya. Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya, 2001 [Maturana U., Varela F. Tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2001].
  47. Mihajlov A.V. Genezis kontinental’noj yuridicheskoj dogmatiki. М.: Yurlitinform, 2012 [Mikhailov A. V. Genesis of continental legal dogma. М.: Yurlitinform, 2012].
  48. Montesk’e Sh.L. O duhe zakonov // Montesk’e Sh.L. Izbr. proizv. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1955 [Montesquieu C. L. On the spirit of laws // Montesquieu C. L. Collected Works. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1955].
  49. Mordovcev A.Yu. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie v kontekste sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya: kul’turantropologicheskie problemy // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 2003. No. 2(247) [Mordovtsev A.Yu. Legal thinking in the context of comparative law: culturological problems // Proceedings of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence. 2003. No. 2(247)].
  50. Muravskij V. A. Rol’ individual’nyh norm v obrazovanii aktual’nogo prava // Ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya RAN. 2002. No. 3. S. 283–303 [Muravsky V.A. The role of individual norms in the formation of relevant law // Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the RAS. 2002. No. 3. P. 283–303].
  51. Novickij I.B. Osnovy rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Moscow: Prospekt, 2015 [Novitsky I.B. Fundamentals of Roman civil law. Moscow: Prospect, 2015].
  52. Ovchinnikov A. I. Pravovoe myshlenie v germenevticheskoj paradigme. Rostov-n./D.: Izd. Rostovsk. un-ta, 2002 [Ovchinnikov A. I. Legal thinking in the hermeneutic paradigm. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing of Rostov University, 2002].
  53. Pereterskij I.S. Digesty Yustiniana. Ocherki po istorii sostavleniya i obshchaya harakteristika. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1956 [Peretersky I.S. Digesta Justinian. Essays on the history of compilation and general characteristics. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1956].
  54. Poldnikov D.Yu. Etapy razvitiya nauchnoj doktriny jus commune v Zapadnoj Evrope v XII–XIV vv. // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11: Pravo, 2013. No 1 [Poldnikov D.Yu. Stages of development of the scientific doctrine of jus commune in Western Europe in the XII–XIV centuries. // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 11: Right, 2013. No. 1].
  55. Poldnikov D.Yu. Etapy formirovaniya civilisticheskoj dogovornoj teorii jus commune // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2012. No. 6 [Poldnikov D.Yu. Stages of the formation of the civilistic contract theory jus commune // State and Law. 2012. No. 6].
  56. Polyakov A. V. Pravo i kommunikaciya // Polyakov A.V. Kommunikativnoe pravoponimanie: Izbr. trudy. Saint Petersburg: OOO Izdat. dom Alef-Press, 2014. S. 11–32 [Polyakov A. V. Law and communication // Polyakov A.V. Communicative legal understanding: Selected works. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House Alef Press House, 2014. S. 11–32].
  57. Problemy funkcional’noj grammatiki: Kategorizaciya semantiki / otv. red. A.V. Bondarko, S.A. Shubik. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2008 [Problems of functional grammar: Categorization of semantics / resp. ed. A.V. Bondarko, S.A. Shubik. Saint Petersburg: Science, 2008].
  58. Proskurin S. G. Evolyuciya prava v svete semiotiki // Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikaciya. 2008. Tom 6. Vyp. 1. S. 48–53 [Proskurin S. G. The evolution of law in the light of semiotics // Bulletin of NSU. Ser.: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2008. Volume 6. Vol. 1, pp. 48-53].
  59. Razuvaev N. V. Gosudarstvo v evolyucionnom izmerenii. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2018 [Razuvaev N.V. State in the evolutionary dimension. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2018].
  60. Razuvaev N. V. Sovremennaya teoriya prava v poiskah postklassicheskoj paradigmy poznaniya // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 2014. No. 5 [Razuvaev N.V. The modern theory of law in search of the postclassical paradigm of knowledge // News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence. 2014. No. 5].
  61. Rassel B. Filosofiya logicheskogo atomizma. Tomsk: Vodolej, 1999 [Russell B. Philosophy of logical atomism. Tomsk: Aquarius, 1999].
  62. Rejhenbah G. Filosofiya prostranstva i vremeni. Izd. 3-e. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom Librokom, 2010 [Reichenbach G. Philosophy of space and time. Ed. 3rd Moscow: Publishing house Librokom, 2010].
  63. Rozhnov A. P. Netradicionnye istochniki prava v pravovoj sisteme // Vestnik VolGU. 2001. Ser. 5. Vyp. 4 [Rozhnov A.P. Non-traditional sources of law in the legal system // Bulletin of VolSU. 2001. Ser. 5. Issue 4].
  64. Romashov R. A. Pravovaya doktrina v anglo-amerikanskom, musul’manskom i rossijskom prave: problema ponimaniya i formy vyrazheniya // Problemy metodologii i filosofii prava. Sb. statej uchastnikov II Mezhdunarodnogo kruglogo stola / pod red. S.N. Kasatkina. Samara: Samarsk. gumanit. akad., 2015 [Romashov R.A. Legal doctrine in Anglo-American, Muslim and Russian law: the problem of understanding and form of expression // Problems of methodology and philosophy of law. Digest of articles of participants of the II International Round Table / ed. S.N. Kasatkina. Samara: Samara humanitarian Acad., 2015].
  65. Savel’ev V. A. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika rimskoj yurisprudencii klassicheskogo perioda // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2008. No 12 [Savelyev V. A. The legal technique of the Roman jurisprudence of the classical period // Journal of Russian Law. 2008. No. 12].
  66. Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto: opyt fenomenologicheskoj ontologii. Moscow: Respublika, 2000 [Sartre J.-P. Being and nothing: the experience of phenomenological ontology. Moscow: Republic, 2000].
  67. Sossyur F. Kurs obshchej lingvistiki. Ekaterinburg: Izd. Ural’sk. un-ta, 1999 [Saussure F. Course in General Linguistics. Ekaterinburg: Publ. Uralsk. University, 1999].
  68. Stepin V.S. Samorazvivayushchiesya sistemy i postneklassicheskaya racional’nost’ // Voprosy filosofii. 2003. No. 8. Р. 5-18 [Stepin V.S. Self-developing systems and post-non-classical rationality // Problems of Philosophy. 2003. No. 8. P. 5-18].
  69. Stovba A.V. Pravovaya situaciya kak istok bytiya prava. Har’kov: LLS, 2006 [Stovba A.V. Legal situation as the source of the existence of law. Kharkov: LLS, 2006].
  70. Tihomirov Yu.A. Pravovaya sistema razvitogo socialisticheskogo obshchestva // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. 1979. No. 7 [Tikhomirov Yu.A. The legal system of a developed socialist society // Sov. state and law. 1979. No. 7].
  71. Tokareva N.N. Nelinejnye bulevy funkcii: beta-funkcii i ih obobshcheniya. Saarbryukken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011 [Tokareva N.N Non-linear Boolean functions: beta-functions and their generalizations. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011].
  72. Uajthed A.N. Nauka i sovremennyj mir // Uajthed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii. Moscow: Progress, 1990 [Whitehead A.N. Science and the modern world // Whitehead A.N. Selected works on philosophy. Moscow: Progress, 1990].
  73. Fedorov A.N. Razdroblennost’ ili vzaimodejstvie: o partikulyarizme prava srednevekovoj Zapadnoj Evropy // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. No. 23(378). Ser.: Pravo, Vyp. 44 [Fedorov A.N. Fragmentation or interaction: on the particularism of medieval Western Europe law // Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2015. No. 23(378). Ser.: Right, Vol. 44].
  74. Feliks L. Elementarnaya matematika v sovremennom izlozhenii. Moscow: Progress, 1967 [Felix L. Elementary mathematics in modern presentation. Moscow: Progress, 1967].
  75. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arheologiya gumanitarnyh nauk. Saint Petersburg: A-cad, 1994 [Foucault M. Words and things. Archeology of the humanities. Saint Petersburg: A-cad, 1994].
  76. Hajdegger M. Bytie i vremya. Moscow: Ad marginem, 1997 [Heidegger M. Being and time. Moscow: Ad marginem, 1997].
  77. Hvostov V. M. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Elementarnyj ocherk. Moscow: Tip. Vil’de, 1914 [Khvostov V.M. General theory of law. Elementary essay. Moscow: Typography of Wilde, 1914].
  78. Homskij N. Aspekty teorii sintaksisa. Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1972 [Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Moscow: Publishing. Moscow State University, 1972].
  79. Homskij N. Kartezianskaya lingvistika. Glava iz istorii racionalisticheskoj mysli. Izd. 2-e. Moscow: KomKniga, 2010 [Chomsky N. Cartesian linguistics. A chapter from the history of rationalist thought. Ed. 2nd. Moscow: KomKniga, 2010].
  80. Chertov L. F. Znakovaya prizma: prostranstvennaya model’ semiozisa // Chertov L.F. Znakovaya prizma: stat’i po obshchej i prostranstvennoj semiotike. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury, 2014. S. 57-68 [Chertov L.F. Sign Prism: a spatial model of semiosis // Chertov L.F. Sign Prism: articles on general and spatial semiotics. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture, 2014. Р. 57-68].
  81. Chicherin B. N. Politicheskie mysliteli Drevnego i Novogo mira. Saint Petersburg: Lan’, 1999 [Chicherin B. N. Political thinkers of the Ancient and New Worlds. St. Petersburg: Doe, 1999].
  82. Shmitt K. Nomos zemli v prave narodov jus publicum europaeum. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, 2008 [Schmitt K. Nomos land in the law of peoples jus publicum europaeum. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal, 2008].
  83. Shyuc A. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyashchijsya smyslom. Moscow: Rossijskaya politicheskaya enciklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2004 [Schütz A. Favorites: A world shining with meaning. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 2004].
  84. Yavich L. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. L.: Izd. LGU, 1976 [Yavich L.S. General theory of law. L.: Ed. LSU, 1976].
  85. Grammont M. Review of A. Gregoire, Petit traité de linguistique // Revue des langues romanes. 1920. Vol. 60 [Grammont M. Review of A. Gregoire, Petit traité de linguistique // Revue des langues romanes. 1920. Vol. 60].
  86. Greimas A.J., Rastier F. The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints // Yale French Studies. 1968. Vol. 41. P. 86-105 [Greimas A.J., Rastier F. The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints // Yale French Studies. 1968. Vol. 41. P. 86-105].
  87. Hocart A.M. Kings and Councillors. Cairo: Egyptian University Press, 1936 [Hocart A.M. Kings and Councillors. Cairo: Egyptian University Press, 1936].
  88. Tebbit M. Philosophy of Law: An Introduction. London; New-York: Routledge&Kegan Paul, 2005 [Tebbit M. Philosophy of Law: An Introduction. London; New-York: Routledge&Kegan Paul, 2005].

Copyright (c) 2019 Razuvaev N.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies