Karl Schmitt on the Hitler phenomenon in German History: an attempt at literary self-knowledge
- Authors: Baev V.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Legal Institute of the Tambov State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 158-164
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2410-7522/article/view/18503
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18503
- ID: 18503
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article analyzes the psychological state of a scientist seeking self-justification for cooperation with the criminal government (after its collapse). Romantic ideas and thoughts about the imposture of Karl Schmitt are a search for a convincing version of one’s own conformism. The author of the article shows that conformism is typical of the entire German legal profession of the Nazi era: they, relying mainly on legal positivism, justified their behavior by defending the position of the state, despite or contrary to Nazism. Schmitt’s case is special: he became a Reich theorist, who subsequently rejected his ideas.
The main thesis of the article is to understand the circumstances under which conformism relativizes professionalism and erodes the boundaries between science and ideology, truth and falsehood — a problem interesting from the point of view of relations between scientists and tyrants (Plato and Dionysius, Voltaire and Friedrich, old lawyers and the Bolsheviks, etc.). With this approach, the article aims to determine the boundary between conformism and cooperation, identifying the factors that determine its transition in general and in Schmitt in particular.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Valery G. Baev
Legal Institute of the Tambov State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: vgbaev@gmail.com
PhD in History, Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Legal Institute, Honorary Worker of Higher Professional Education
Russian Federation, TambovReferences
- Шиллер. План трагедии «Димитрий Самозванец» // Шиллер. Полн. собр. соч. в переводе русских писателей. 7-е изд. Т. 2. СПб., 1893.
- Kommerell M. Der Dichter als Führer in der deutschen Klassik. Klopstock, Herder,Goethe, Schiller, Jean Paul, Hölderlin. Berlin, 1928.
- Kommerell M. Schiller als Gestalter des handelnden Menschen. Frankfurt am Main, 1934.
- Mehring R. Hitler-Schiller: Carl Schmitts nachgelassene Hitler-Reflexionen im Licht von Max Kommerells Schiller-Deutung // Leviathan. Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft. 2005. No. 2.
- Schmitt C. Der Wert des Staates und die Bedeutung des Einzelnen. Tübingen, 1914.
- Schmitt C. Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes. Sinn und Fehlschlag eines Symbols. Hamburg, 1938.
- Schmitt C. Gespräch über die Macht und den Zugang zum Machthaber. Pfullingen, 1954.
- Schmitt C. Zu Friedrich Meineckes «Idee der Staatsräson» (1928) // ders. Positionen und Begrriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles. Hamburg, 1940.
- Schmitt C. Glossarium. Aufzeichnungen der Jahre 1947-1951. Hrsg. von E. von Medem. Berlin, 1991.
- Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924 bis 1954. Materialien zu einer Verfassungslehre. Berlin, 1958