Risks and Threats of Total Digitalization: Opportunity and Manageability Level

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article deals with society’s different spheres and parts of the economy’s total digitalization, particularly in the transportation security sphere. Although artificial Intelligence carries multiple process-simplifying innovations, it possesses numerous hidden threats and risks in digital technology transformation. China’s social credit system experience that carried out global digital technologies is analyzed. Digitalization is a method employed to transform managerial and legal decisions into the digital field. Modern humans should find their position in this digital space.

About the authors

Anastasia V. Timchenko

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: avtimchenko@centero.ru

Laboratory for Legal-Policy Studies Researcher, Political Science Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Shestakova IG. New temporality of digital civilization: the future has already come. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. 2019;10(2):20–29. doi: 10.18721/JHSS.10202 (In Russ.).
  2. Grafov DB. The system of social ranking in the PRC as the information and communication technology of reward and punishment. Vlast. 2020;(2):250–259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7165 (In Russ.).
  3. Vakhitova LR, Kudryavtseva KV. On the essence of public goods in the digital economy. Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya Ekonomika i ekologicheskij menedzhment. 2020;(2):213–218. doi: 10.17586/2310-1172-2020-13-2-213-218 (In Russ.).
  4. Konkov AE. Digital politics vs political digitalization. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2020;13(1):47–68. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.104 (In Russ.).
  5. Zemtsov S. New technologies, potential unemployment and ‘nescience economy’ during and after the 2020 economic crisis. Regional Science Policy & Practice. 2020;4(12):723–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12286
  6. Otcenka vliyania krizisa, svyazannogo s pandemiei COVID-19, na otrasly rossiyskoi ekonomiki i ih postkrizisnoe razvitie: dokl. k XXII Apr. mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferencii po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshestva, Moscow, 13-30 apr. 2021. Ed. by Simachev UV et al. Moscow: Izd. Dom Vischei shkoly ekonomiki, 2021. 45 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Dremliuga RI, Koshel AS. Artificial intelligence as a social regulator: pros and cons. Aziatsko-Tihookeanskij region: ekonomika, politika, pravo. 2018;20(3):55–68. DOI dx.doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2018-3/55-68 (In Russ.).
  8. Tsifrovaya transformacia i zashita prav grazhdan v tsifrovom prostranstve. Doklad Sovieta pri Prezidente Rossiiskoi Federacii po razvitiyu grazdanskogo obshestva i pravam cheloveka. Moscow. 2021. P. 34–37 (In Russ.).
  9. Varlamova NV. Digital rights — new generation of human rights? (ending). Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2019;14(5):141–167. doi: 10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-5 (In Russ.).
  10. Revenko NS. U.S. digital economy in the era of information globalization: current trends. USA&Canada: economy-policy-culture. 2017;(8):81–83 (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Timchenko A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies