Eurocentrism within the Framework of International Legal Research: a Review and Critique of the Main Methodological Positions

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article examines various aspects of the Eurocentric nature of international legal research. The author concludes that the Eurocentric framework of international law inevitably leads to increased regional and global tensions, as neo-colonial discourse is the main projection of Eurocentrism. According to the author, the criteria of objectivity are incompatible with the methodology of extreme Eurocentrism. The optimal variant of a counter-revocentric strategy is only possible within the framework of the pluralism of constitutive international legal processes.

About the authors

Emil A. Karakulyan

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod

Author for correspondence.
Email: isoforma@yahoo.fr
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0761-6601

candidate of legal sciences

Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod

References

  1. Tourme-Jouannet E. Le droit international. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2013. 128 p.
  2. Fushe M. Evropejskaya respublika. Istoricheskie i geograficheskie kontury. Esse. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1999. 168 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Fassbender B, Peters A (eds). The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. OUP, 2012. P. 764–786.
  4. Karakulyan EA. Sistematizaciya mezhdunarodnogo obshcheniya. Nekotorye aspekty metodologii filosofii mezhdunarodnogo prava. Ocherki istorii religioznoj i svetskoj politiko-pravovoj mysli. Pod obshch. red. Kalininoj EV: monografiya. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2017. 232 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Batalov EYa. Antropologiya mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij Mezhdunarodnye processy. 2005;3(2):4–16. (In Russ.).
  6. Koskenniemi M. Histories of international law: significance and problems for a critical view. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal. 2013;27(2):215–240.
  7. Viko D. Osnovaniya novoj nauki ob obshchej prirode nacij. Moscow; Kiev: «REFL-book»-«ISA», 1994. 656 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Koskenniemi M. Histories of International law: Dealing with Eurocentrism. Rechtsgeschichte Rg. 2011;19:152–176.
  9. Gerrit W Gong. The Standard of Civilization in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984. 267 p.
  10. Skouteris T. The Turn to History in International Law. Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets, 2017. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199796953-0154
  11. Koskenniemi M. A History of International Law Histories. Oxford Handbooks Online. 2012. doi: 10.1093/law/9780199599752.003.0040
  12. Koskenniemi M. International Law as Political Theology: How to Read Nomos der Erde? Constellations. 2004;11(4):492–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1351-0487.2004.00391.x
  13. Jouannet E, & Sutcliffe C (n.d.). The Liberal-Welfarist Law of Nations: A History of International Law by Emmanuelle Jouannet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. 318 p. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139093583.023
  14. Uajt H. Metaistoriya: Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2002. 528 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Pepper SС. World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Los Angeles, 1966. 348 p.
  16. Obregón L. Martti Koskenniemi's Critique of Eurocentrism in International Law. In W. Werner, M. De Hoon, & A. Galán (Eds.). The Law of International Lawyers: Reading Martti Koskenniemi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. P. 360–392. doi: 10.1017/9781108147620.015
  17. Martineau AC. Overcoming Eurocentrism? Global History and the Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. European Journal of International Law. 2014;25(1):329–336. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chu017
  18. Lorca AB. Eurocentrism in the History of International Law. Oxford Handbooks Online, 2012. doi: 10.1093/law/9780199599752.003.0044
  19. Anand RP. “The Influence of History on the Literature of International Law” in RStJ MacDonald and DM Johnston (eds). The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine, and Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983. P. 341–380.
  20. Onuma Y. When Was the Law of International Society Born? — An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective. Journal of the History of International Law. 2000;(2):1–66.
  21. Alexandrowicz Ch. The Afro-Asian World and the Law of Nations (Historical Aspects). Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye. 1968;(123):117–214.
  22. Anghie A. Imperalism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. CUP Cambridge, 2007. 356 p.
  23. Kirmse SB. Sleepy Side Alleys, Dead Ends, and the Perpetuation of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Law. 2014;25(1):307–311. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chu009

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig.

Download (81KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Karakulyan E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies