The Testimony of Suspect and Accused Individuals as Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
- Authors: Ponomarev S.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Prosecutor’s office of the Omsk region
- Issue: Vol 11, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 87-94
- Section: Criminal law
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2410-7522/article/view/284815
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS635599
- ID: 284815
Cite item
Abstract
Recently, the issue of providing evidence in criminal proceedings has gained significant relevance. The outcome of a criminal case heavily relies on the accuracy and clarity with which evidence is presented. This article examines a specific type of evidence: the testimony of a suspect or accused, highlighting its unique features. Notably, the legal definition of the subject of such testimony is not explicitly outlined in the law. Furthermore, it is important to recognize that the legislative regulation of testimony differs from the procedural status of the individual being interrogated. Interestingly, the legislator assigns less legal weight to the confession of the accused compared to other forms of evidence. Three levels of the subject of proof in criminal cases were identified. In conclusion, it is emphasized that a clear distinction must be made between the content of testimony subject to proof in a criminal case and the information required to substantiate only the procedural circumstances of the case.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Sergey E. Ponomarev
Prosecutor’s office of the Omsk region
Author for correspondence.
Email: s.e.ponomarev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-8450-9732
prosecutor
Russian Federation, OmskReferences
- Agutin AV, Aleksandrov AS, Alekseeva LB, et al. Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Radchenko VI, editor. Moscow: Yurait; 2006. 1365 p. EDN: QRHTPP
- Sheifer SA. Evidence and proof in criminal cases: problems of theory and legal regulation. Moscow: Norma; 2009. 240 p. EDN: NBAYXZ
- Azarov VA, Lukashevich SV. Proof in criminal cases of tax evasion. Omsk: Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 2009. 183 p. EDN: VRSBAH
- Smirnova IS. Proceedings on a complex criminal case at pre-trial stages. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2015. 224 p. (In Russ.) EDN: SYLGNH
- Yemelkina NL. Subject of proof and involvement as an accused in cases of crimes against the interests of the service in commercial and other organizations [dissertation]. 219 p. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.) EDN: NODZYZ
- Shmonin AV. On the issue of the concept of the subject of proof. In: Smirnov AV, editor. Schools and directions of criminal procedural science: reports and communications at the founding conference of the International Association for Assistance to Justice. Saint Petersburg, October 5–6, 2005. Saint Petersburg; 2005. (In Russ.)
- Korma VD, Obraztsov VA. Investigative knowledge as an object of interdisciplinary research. Lex Russica. 2018;(12):90–100. (In Russ.) EDN: YRVHRJ doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.145.12.090-100
- Kasatkina SA. Confession of the accused. Moscow: Prospect; 2010. 224 p. (In Russ.) EDN: SUNVZH
- Karyakin EA. Problems of procedural proof in Russian criminal proceedings based on the adversarial principle [dissertation abstract]. Orenburg; 2002. (In Russ.)
- Cheltsov-Bebutov MA. The accused and his testimony in soviet criminal procedure. Golyakov IT, editor. Moscow: Legal Publishing House of the USSR Ministry of Justice; 1947. 52 p. (In Russ.)
- Strogovich M. S. Admission of guilt by the accused as judicial evidence. Soviet State and Law. 1982;(4):68–74. (In Russ.)
- Rakhunov RD. Evidentiary value of the accused’s confession in soviet criminal procedure. Soviet State and Law. 1956;(8):34–43. (In Russ.)
- Shalamov MP. On the question of assessing the accused’s consciousness. Soviet State and Law. 1956;(8):44–50. (In Russ.)
- Budnikov VL. Admission of guilt by the defendant is not evidence in criminal proceedings. Russian Justice. 2007;(4):44–45. (In Russ.)
- Kaminskaya VI. Testimony of the accused in Soviet criminal proceedings. Strogovich MS, editor. Moscow: Publishing house of the USSR Academy of Sciences; 1960. 182 p. (In Russ.)
- Yakub ML. Testimony of the accused as a source of evidence in Soviet criminal proceedings. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University; 1963. 80 p. (In Russ.)
- Dobrovolskaya TN. Testimony of the accused as evidence in Soviet criminal proceedings [dissertation abstract]. Sverdlovsk; 1950. 18 p. (In Russ.)
- Budnikov V, Rusyaev A. Testimony in criminal proceedings. Legality. 2006;(9):42–44. (In Russ.) EDN: KWLKJR
- Kostenko RV. Content and form of testimony in criminal proceedings. Magistrate judge. 2006;(5):18–21. (In Russ.) EDN: JVINHQ
Supplementary files
