Prosecutor’s Response Measures in the Implementation of Prosecutor’s Supervision over the Implementation of Laws outside the Criminal Legal Sphere

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article reveals certain aspects of the application of response measures by prosecutors within the framework of supervision over the implementation of laws outside the criminal legal sphere based on an analysis of the current legislation and organizational as well as administrative documents of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, considering literary sources used. Proposals are being made to improve certainly.

About the authors

Alexander Yu. Vinokurov

University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: vinalexur@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 7683-7350

Professor, Doctor of Law

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Vinokurov AYu. On the issue of classifying the supervisory powers of the prosecutor. Problems of strengthening the rule of law and order: science, practice, trends: sat. scientific. tr. Minsk: BGUFK. 2010;(3):274–281. (In Russ.).
  2. Krutikov MYu. Prosecutor's response as a specific form of implementing the human rights function of the state. State power and local self-government. 2009;(7):33–36. (In Russ.).
  3. Filipenko SV. Problems of application of acts of prosecutor's response at the current stage of development of the Russian state. Business, Management and Law. 2014;(1):110–113. (In Russ.).
  4. Osintsev DV. Acts of state control (supervision) bodies and acts of prosecutor's response: grounds and conditions for adoption and implementation. Legality. 2017;(5):24–27. (In Russ.).
  5. Filipenko SV. Signs of acts of prosecutor's response. Russian Law Journal. 2014;(6):139–141. (In Russ.).
  6. Byzova MV. Procedure and terms of consideration of the supervisory submission of the prosecutor. Legality. 2009;(9):43–45. (In Russ.).
  7. Filipenko SV. Bringing to disciplinary responsibility on the basis of the submission of the prosecutor. Legality. 2018;(1):13–15. (In Russ.).
  8. Filipenko SV. Issues of bringing to disciplinary responsibility employees of the authorities on the basis of the submission of the prosecutor. Legality. 2021;(5):8–11. (In Russ.).
  9. Baikin IM. Protest as a measure of prosecutor's response. Legality. 2010;(6):45–47. (In Russ.).
  10. Filipenko SV. Problems of preparation and implementation of the prosecutor's protest during the supervision of the implementation of laws. Russian Law Journal. 2014;(3):128–133. (In Russ.).
  11. Vinokurov AYu. Administrative prosecution as a function of the prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation: theoretical, legal and organizational aspects: monograph. Moscow: University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation; Prospect, 2019. 552 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Arishak KS. Subject authorized to issue a decision to initiate an administrative offense case. Legality. 2018;(6):32–36. (In Russ.).
  13. Bezrukavaya NI. Initiation of cases of administrative offenses against citizens by the prosecutor. Administrative law and process. 2016;(7):17–19. (In Russ.).
  14. Galchenko AI. Initiation of cases of administrative offenses by the prosecutor. Legality. 2014;(2):20–25. (In Russ.).
  15. Ergashev ER. On the problems of regulatory regulation of the application of the decision to initiate administrative proceedings as an act of prosecutor's response. Business, Management and Law. 2012;(2):52–55. (In Russ.).
  16. Aleshkova NP. The prosecutor's requirement to change the regulatory legal act when corruption factors are identified in it. Legality. 2012;(12):11–14. (In Russ.).
  17. Kudashkin AV. Requirement to change the regulatory legal act: issues of theory and practice of its application by prosecutors during anti-corruption examination. Russian Justice. 2011;(4):2–6. (In Russ.).
  18. Bondarenko VA, Ershova VA. Legality of challenging the prosecutor's submission. Legality. 2014;(6):9–12. (In Russ.).
  19. Glukhov EA. On the possibility of challenging acts of prosecutor's response. Law in the Armed Forces. 2014;(3): 99–109. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies