Defects of Rendering Medical Care: Legal Consequences of Professional Noncompetence

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The authors refer to the topic related to the establishment of justice in the protection of such constitutional rights as the right to life, the right to health, the right to medical assistance in determining how individuals with special knowledge, namely, medical professionals act as subjects, facilitating the implementation of these rights and monitoring them through, including legal mechanisms. The issues of ambiguous interpretation of the term «medical error» and the competence of commission forensic medical examination in assessing the quality of medical care are considered. The author cites the classification of defects in the provision of medical care. The concept of «medical error» is not used, since the term «medical error» is indifferent to the law, it is replaced by the term defining any illegal action of the doctor, namely - «defect in the provision of medical care». The authors identify the following types of defects of medical care: deliberate iatrogenic (deliberate defect) is a defect of medical care resulting from intentional crime; iatrogenic careless (negligent defect) is a defect of medical care, including signs of careless crimes; erroneous iatrogenic disease (medical error) - defects in the provision of medical care associated with a conscientious delusion of a medical worker that do not contain signs of intent or negligence; accidental iatrogenic disease (accident) - defects in the provision of medical care associated with an unforeseen coincidence, which does not exclude the lawful actions of medical workers. On the basis of acquaintance with practice of rendering medical care in work it is noted that specific weight of defects of rendering medical care and medical mistakes is rather big. The paper notes the data of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, giving the information of death due to medical errors in American hospitals. The paper deals with the subjective and objective causes of medical errors, the most common causes of medical errors are indicated. The data of monitoring of citizens’ appeals regarding the failure to comply with the provisions of the Federal Law of November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ «On the fundamentals of protecting the health of citizens in the Russian Federation». Analyzed appeals of citizens of the Russian Federation, containing claims in view of improper performance by medical workers of their official duties. The materials are presented taking into account the appeal to the foreign experience of regulation of these issues.

About the authors

E V Savoshchikova

OSU

Email: jene30@mail.ru

I A Voronina

OSU

Email: i_voronina@mail.ru

D A Sablin

OSU

Email: dsablinosu@mail.ru

References

  1. Доскин В. А. Врачебные ошибки и конфликтные ситуации в клинической практике // Клиническая медицина. 2014. № 4. С. 57.
  2. Коротких Р. В. Страхование профессиональной ответственности как форма социальной защиты медицинских работников // Здравоохранение. 2000. № 7. С. 49-65.
  3. Кущенко В. В. Врачебная ошибка // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2005. Т. 1. № 3. С. 69-73.
  4. Самойличенко А. Н. О медико-юридической оценке врачебной ошибки // Проблемы экспертизы в медицине. Т. 7. № 28-4. С. 8-9.
  5. Стеценко Е. Г. Врачебные ошибки и несчастные случаи в практике работ учреждений здравоохранения: правовые аспекты // Юрист. 2004. № 2. С. 44-47.
  6. Шарабичев Ю. Т. Врачебные ошибки и дефекты оказания медицинской помощи: социально-экономические аспекты и потери общественного здоровья // Медицинские новости. 2017. № 13. С. 32-39.

Copyright (c) 2018 Savoshchikova E.V., Voronina I.A., Sablin D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies