The term «protest» in constitutional law: the meaning and contents

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article attempts to define the meaning and contents of the concept «protest» as it exists in constitutional law. The author abstains from acknowledging «the right to protest» in Russia’s constitutional law system. Instead it is studied how the opportunities to express the protest against decisions, actions (or lack thereof) by public authorities can be implemented as the modes of substantive public participation. The author considers the differences between formal and substantive public participation while emphasizing that the Constitution of the Russian Federation avoids direct usage of such terms as «protest», «criticism», or «objections» with respect to both types of such participation.

About the authors

M A Riekkinen

Tyumen State University

Email: mariya.riekkinen@abo.fi

References

  1. Авакьян С.А. Конституция как символ эпохи. M.: МГУ, 2004. 437 с.
  2. Келасьев О.В., Казаков С.В., Лейес А.Ю. Специфика коммуникации власти и населения в контексте массового публичного протеста // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2006. Т. 9. № 1 (34). С. 103-122. Керимов Д.А. Философские проблемы права. М.: Мысль, 1972. 472 с.
  3. Козырев Г.И. Политическая конфликтология: учеб. пособие. М.: Форум: Инфра-М, 2008. 432 с.
  4. Тихомиров Ю.А. Государство. М.: Норма: Инфра-М, 2013. 320 с.
  5. Троицкая А.А. Право на протест: содержание и эффективность реализации // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2012. № 5. С. 34-42.
  6. Чиркин В.Е. Публичное управление: учебник для студентов вузов. М.: Юрист, 2004. 475 с.
  7. Чиркин В.Е. Система государственного и муниципального управления: учебник для вузов. М.: Юрист, 2004. 379 с.
  8. Чичерин Б.Н. Курс государственной науки: в 3 т. М.: Тип. т-ва И. Кушнерев и Ко, 1894.
  9. Bach W.A. Governance, Accountability, and the New Poverty Agenda // Wisconsin Law Review. 2010. № 2. P. 239-296.
  10. Bach W.A. Welfare Reform, Privatization, and Power. Reconfiguring Administrative Law Structures from the Ground Up // Brooklyn Law Review. 2009. № 74. P. 275-324.
  11. Banks A.M. Expanding Participation in Constitution Making: Challenges and Opportunities / William and Mary Law Review. 2008. № 49. P. 1043-1069.
  12. Dahl R.A. On Political Equality. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2006. 155 p.
  13. Garner B.A. (ed.). Black’s Law Dictionary. Eights Edition. St. Paul, 2004. 1810 p.
  14. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996. 340 p.
  15. Meyer D.S., Staggenborg S. Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity // American Journal of Sociology. 1996. № 101. P. 1628-1660.
  16. Rawls J. A theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 2003. № 44. P. 387-431.
  17. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996. P. 38.

Copyright (c) 2016 Riekkinen M.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies