Comparative characteristics of the properties of polymer materials used for the manufacture of removable denture bases
- Authors: Vokulova Y.A.1, Zhulev E.N.2, Nikolaeva E.Y.2, Velmakina I.V.2, Yanova N.A.1, Plishkina A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
- Privolzhsky Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 25, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 58-62
- Section: DENTISTRY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2410-3764/article/view/291089
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.35693/AVP655547
- ID: 291089
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim – to conduct a comparative characterization of the properties of polymer materials (water absorption and solubility) used for the manufacture of removable denture bases using traditional and digital methods.
Material and methods. To conduct the study, experimental samples were made from cold polymerized base resin based on polymethylmethacrylate Vertex Castapress (Vertex Dental, the Netherlands) and photopolymer material for 3D printing Next Dent Base (Next Dent, the Netherlands) in the amount of 5 pieces for each material. The study was conducted in accordance with GOST 31572-2012 “Polymer materials for denture bases”. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann – Whitney test.
Results. For the photopolymer base material for 3D printing, Next Dent Base, the average value of water absorption is 9.857 ± 0.2165 micrograms/mm3, and solubility is 0.22 ± 0.1483 micrograms/mm3. For the basic cold-polymerized resin based on polymethylmethacrylate Vertex Castapress, the average value of water absorption is 13.46 ± 0.1826 micrograms/mm3, solubility is 0.74 ± 0.1342 micrograms/mm3.
Conclusions. Criteria of water absorption and solubility are used to assess the ability of basic plastics to withstand the effects of saliva and are indicators of durability and bioinertness of dentures. Next Dent Base, a photopolymer base material for 3D printing, has better water absorption and solubility in comparison with Vertex Castapress cold polymerization resin, which indicates that this material has greater strength and wear resistance (the medians of the samples differ by 32.4% according to the criterion of water absorption, and by 75.0% according to the criterion of solubility).
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Yuliya A. Vokulova
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Author for correspondence.
Email: Vokulova89@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5220-2032
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor at the Department of Clinical Dentistry at the Institute of Clinical Medicine
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodEvgenii N. Zhulev
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: hrustalev54@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9539-3350
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry and Orthodontics
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodElena Yu. Nikolaeva
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: el.nikolaevaa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2248-5446
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry and Orthodontics
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodIrina V. Velmakina
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: velmakinairina@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0198-9928
SPIN-code: 2996-5982
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry and Orthodontics
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodNina A. Yanova
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: nina-yanova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3436-5150
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor at the Department of Clinical Dentistry at the Institute of Clinical Medicine
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodAnna A. Plishkina
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Email: plishkina@unn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2124-9740
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor at the Department of Clinical Dentistry at the Institute of Clinical Medicine
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodReferences
- Greil V, Mayinger F, Reymus M, et al. Water sorption, water solubility, degree of conversion, elastic indentation modulus, edge chipping resistance and flexural strength of 3D-printed denture base resins. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;137:105565. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105565
- Zafar MS. Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(10):2299. doi: 10.3390/polym12102299
- Prosthetic dentistry: national guidelines. Eds. Lebedenko IYu, Arutyunov SD, Ryaxovskij AN. Vol 2. M., 2022. (In Russ.). [Ортопедическая стоматология: национальное руководство. Том 2. Под ред. Лебеденко И.Ю., Арутюнова С.Д., Ряховского А.Н. М., 2022].
- Alqutaibi AY, Baik A, Almuzaini SA, et al. Polymeric Denture Base Materials: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(15):3258. doi: 10.3390/polym15153258
- Mohd Farid DA, Zahari NAH, Said Z, et al. Modification of Polymer Based Dentures on Biological Properties: Current Update, Status, and Findings. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10426. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810426
- Zhulev EN. Prosthetic dentistry. M., 2012. (In Russ.). [Жулев Е.Н. Ортопедическая стоматология. М., 2012].
- Srinivasan M, Kamnoedboon P, McKenna G, et al. CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Dent. 2021;113:103777. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103777
- Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Kamnoedboon P, et al. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. J Dent. 2021;114:103785. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103785
- Zandinejad A, Floriani F, Lin WS, et al. Clinical outcomes of milled, 3D-printed, and conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(8):736-747. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13859
- Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, et al. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.001
- Srinivasan M, Cantin Y, Mehl A, et al. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(6):2007-2019. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1989-7
- Stilwell C, Kalberer N, Mojon P, et al. Extra-oral assessment of conventional and CAD-CAM complete denture appearance by dental professionals and CRDP wearers: A randomized survey. J Dent. 2021;115:103843. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103843
- Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Fankhauser N, et al. CAD-CAM complete removable dental prostheses: A double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial evaluating milled and 3D-printed dentures. J Dent. 2021;115:103842. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103842
- Korexov BN, Ryaxovskij AN, Poyurovskaya IYa, et al. Physical-mechanical characteristics of elastic materials for removable prosthetics. Stomatologiia. 2009;88(6):55-59. (In Russ.). [Корехов Б.Н., Ряховский А.Н., Поюровская И.Я., и др. Физико-механические характеристики эластичных материалов для съемных зубных протезов. Стоматология. 2009;88(6):55-59].
- Kostrov YaV, Belokonova NA, Vshivkov SA, et al. Analysis of methods of evaluating of dental polymer materials. Advances in current natural sciences. 2016;5:25-32. (In Russ.). [Костров Я.В., Белоконова Н.А., Вшивков С.А., и др. Анализ методов оценки свойств стоматологических полимерных материалов. Успехи современного естествознания. 2016;5:25-32]. Доступно по: https://natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=35892/
- Gad MM, Alshehri SZ, Alhamid SA et al. Water Sorption, Solubility, and Translucency of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(3):42. doi: 10.3390/dj10030042
- Perea-Lowery L, Gibreel M, Vallittu PK, et al. 3D-Printed vs. Heat-Polymerizing and Autopolymerizing Denture Base Acrylic Resins. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(19):5781. doi: 10.3390/ma14195781
Supplementary files
