The emergence of affordances of artifacts as a process of knowledge accumulation (on the example of weapons)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim – to determine the typology of weapons and to substantiate the need to assess the degree of destructive impact of the affordances of artifacts used as weapons on the surrounding objects and society as a whole. The Michael Cole's theory was used as the methodological basis of the study, which has a great applicative potential and allows you to give an object a comprehensive description. An "artifact" is a material man-made object produced in the process of creative transformation and intended for a specific purpose. The term "affordance", introduced by James Gibson, is interpreted as a "potential opportunity" for a detailed analysis of all possible options for the use of an artefact, depending on the person's current intentions. The author considers the process of active cognitive activity of the subject resulting in the invention of new functions of material objects from the standpoint of epistemological realism. The existing classification of weapons, from the point of view of the process of meaning formation, does not fully reveal all the features of its creation and functions laid down at the stages of design and production. The article presents the original typology of weapons based on the analysis of the stages of the evolution of mankind, the change in scientific representation of the world and the types of scientific rationality. The strict legislative regulation of the trade, production, acquisition, carrying and use of certain types of weapons pushes people, in cases of a threat to their life and health, to use ordinary household items as means of protection. Under these conditions, there is a need to revise existing approaches and methods for examination and evaluation of artefacts created by people that allow their use as a weapon.

About the authors

V. V. Larionov

Vologda State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: larsvic79@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3082-9763

part-time postgraduate student

Russian Federation, Vologda

References

  1. Koul M. Cultural-historical psychology. M., 1997. (In Russ.). [Коул М. Культурно-историческая психология. М., 1997].
  2. Cole M. Cultural Psychology: А Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, 1998.
  3. Vygotskii LS. Development of higher mental functions. M., 1960. (In Russ.). [Выготский Л.С. Развитие высших психических функций. М., 1960].
  4. Vygotskii LS. Collected Works in 6 volumes. Ed. A.M. Matyushkin. M, 1983. Vol. 3. (In Russ.). [Выготский Л.С. Собрание сочинений в 6 томах. Под ред. А.М. Матюшкина. М., 1983. Т. 3].
  5. Dessauer F. Dispute about technology. Trans. from German. Samara, 2017. (In Russ.). [Дессауэр Ф. Спор о технике. Перевод с нем. Самара, 2017].
  6. Lektorsky VA. Constructive realism as the contemporary form of epistemological realism. Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2018;23(2):18-22. (In Russ.). [Лекторский В.А. Конструктивный реализм как современная форма эпистемологического реализма. Философия науки и техники. 2018;23(2):18-22]. doi: 10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-18-22
  7. Yastreb NА. Between functionalism and semiotics: two ways to change the functions and meanings of technical objects. Semiotic studies. 2021;1:19-25. (In Russ.). [Ястреб Н.А. На границе функционализма и семиотики: два способа изменения функций и смыслов технических объектов. Семиотические исследования. 2021;1:19-25]. doi: 10.18287/2782-2966-2021-1-1-19-25
  8. Gibson JJ. Reasons for Realism. Resources for Ecological Psychology. New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982.
  9. Harré R. Constructivism and the foundations of knowledge. M., 2009. (In Russ.). [Харре Р. Конструктивизм и основания знания. М., 2009].
  10. Gibson JJ. Ecological approach to visual perception. Trans. from English. M., 1988. (In Russ.). [Гибсон Дж. Экологический подход к зрительному восприятию. Пер. с англ. М., 1988].
  11. Klenk M. How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values? Philosophy & Technology. 2021;34:525-544. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y
  12. Tyson ND. In the service of war: the tacit union of astrophysics and the army. Trans. from English. М., 2020. (In Russ.). [Тайсон Н.Д. На службе у войны: негласный союз астрофизики и армии. Пер. с англ. М., 2020].
  13. Military Encyclopedic Dictionary. Ed. A.M. Prokhorov. М., 2001. (In Russ.). [Военный энциклопедический словарь. Под ред. А.М. Прохорова. М., 2001].
  14. Delanda M. War in the age of intelligent machines. Trans. from English. M., 2014. (In Russ.). [Деланда М. Война в эпоху разумных машин. Пер. с англ. М., 2014].
  15. McMahon TA, Bonner JT. On Size and Life. Washington, DC: Scientific American Library, 1983.
  16. Stepin VS. History and Philosophy of Science. М., 2017. (In Russ.). [Степин В.С. История и философия науки. М., 2017].
  17. On weapons. Federal law. 13.12.1996 N 150. (In Russ.). [Об оружии. Федеральный закон РФ от 13 декабря 1996 г. №150-ФЗ].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Larionov V.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).