Email this article Experience in philosophical self-criticism: between settlement and nomadic nomos
- Authors: Bolotnikova E.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- International Market Institute
- Issue: Vol 21, No 7-8 (2021)
- Pages: 29-34
- Section: Philosophical sciences
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2410-3764/article/view/105028
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55531/2072-2354.2021.21.4.29-34
- ID: 105028
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of philosophical discourse. Based on J. Deleuze’s methodological approach, the author examines the philosophical work in two perspectives: sedentary and nomadic nomos. In the first projection structures, plots, themes are established, in the second, the displacement, shift, significance, playing with meanings happen. In the first projection, philosophers follow the ancient motto “Discover yourself”, in the second – “Take care of yourself”. “Sedentary” and “nomadic” way make conditional on each other. The author shows their interaction in philosophical discourse, referring to the works of Kant, K. Marx and Nietzsche. In the conclusion, it has been established that the existence at the borders turned out to be the key to overcoming the temporal and spatial conditionality of philosophical thought.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Elena N. Bolotnikova
International Market Institute
Author for correspondence.
Email: vlad_lena@mail.ru
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Ado P. Chto takoe antichnaya filosofiya? Transl. from French V.P. Gaidamak. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.)
- Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’. Transl. from Engl. Ed. by Yu.V. Asochakov. Saint Petersburg; 2008. (In Russ.)
- Bibihin V. Nitsshe v pole evropeiskoi mysli. In: Nitsshe i sovremennaya zapadnaya mysl’: sbornik statei. Ed. by V. Kaplun. Saint Petersburg; Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.)
- Delyoz Zh, Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya? Transl. from French S.N. Zenkin. Moscow; Saint Petersburg; 1998. (In Russ.)
- Delyoz Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. Transl. from French N.B. Man’kovskaya, E.P. Yurovskaya. Saint Petersburg; 1998. (In Russ.)
- Zotov AF. Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya. Textbook. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.)
- Kant I. Prolegomeny ko vsyakoi budushchei metafizike, mogushchei poyavit’sya kak nauka. In: Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6 t. Ed. by V.F. Asmus, A.V. Gulygi, T.I. Ojzerman. Moscow; 1966. Vol. 4. (In Russ.)
- Kant I. Chto takoe prosveshchenie In: Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6 t. Ed. by V.F. Asmus, A.V. Gulygi, T.I. Ojzerman. Moscow; 1966. Vol. 6. (In Russ.)
- Kriticheskaya sociologiya zaboty: perekryostki social’nogo neravenstva: sbornik statej. Ed. by E. Borozdinaya, E. Zdravomyslova, A. Temkina. Saint Petersburg; 2019. (In Russ.)
- Marks K, Enegel’s F. Korrespondentsiya kriticheskoi kritiki [Internet]. Svyatoe semeistvo ili kritika kriticheskoi kritiki. Protiv Bruno Bauera i kompanii. Available from: https://www.marxists.org/russkij/marx/1844/holy_family/08.htm. Accessed: 10.04.2021. (In Russ.)
- Nicshe F. Vesyolaya nauka. In: Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v 2 t. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’; 1990. (In Russ.)
- Nicshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii, ili ellinstvo i pessimism. In: Nicshe F. Sochineniya v 2 t. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’; 1990. (In Russ.)
- Fuko M. Tekhnologii sebya. Logos. 2008;(2(65)):96–123. (In Russ.)
- Heidegger M. Bytie i vremya. Transl. from Germ. V.V. Bibikhin. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1997. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
