On the representation of the cultural category of sinfulness in the works of A.N. Radishchev
- Authors: Semukhina E.A.1, Ovchinnikova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 5 (2023)
- Pages: 61-68
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8744/article/view/361338
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BWIQGC
- ID: 361338
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of the research in this article is the category of sinfulness and the peculiarities of its actualization in the Russian culture of the late XVIII – early XIX century. The author examines the category under study through the prism of fiction, since this historical period is characterized by a special literary centrism, when the social, spiritual, and cultural life of society was reliably reflected in the works of art. The author focuses on the cultural analysis of A.N. Radishchev's treatise "On man, his mortality and Immortality", in which the category of sinfulness is represented through the writer's appeal to such concepts as vice, virtue, the sin of lust, greed, laziness and pride, as well as to the idea of punishment for sins, images of heaven and hell. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that for the first time the category of sinfulness was considered, an objectification of the sin was found in the work of A.N. Radishchev "About man, his mortality and immortality". In his essay, the writer examines in detail the sin of lust, its causes and consequences, devoting only a few lines to other sins, such as laziness, greed and pride, which allows us to judge their subjective significance. Based on the conducted cultural analysis, the author concludes that the category under study is implicit and is the basic one for the Russian society of the XIX century. In the work of A.N. Radishchev, the main, regulatory function of the category of sinfulness is actualized.
About the authors
Elena Aleksandrovna Semukhina
Email: semuh@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8560-0707
Elena Viktorovna Ovchinnikova
Email: ovchinnikovaev@sstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1197-5853
References
Пинковский В. И. Литературоцентризм как препятствие на путик разностороннему пониманию произведений // Совершенствование науки в наши дни. Часть 1. Ростов-на-Дону: ООО "Издательство ВВМ", 2022. С. 166-168. Турышева О. Н. Русский литературоцентризм в аспекте литературной рефлексии // Уральский филологический вестник. 2013. №1. С. 228-243. Радищев А. Н. О человеке, его смертности и бессмертии // Полное собрание сочинений. Москва-Ленинград: Издательство Академии наук СССР, 1938-1954. Т. 2. С. 40-142. Храповицкий А. В. Памятные записки А.В. Храповицкого, статс-секретаря императрицы Екатерины Второй. М.: Университетская типография, 1862. 294 с. Эйдельман Н. Я. «Вослед Радищеву…» // Факел. Историко-революционный альманах. М., 1989. С. 18–36. Маслова А. А. Печатать запрещается: к вопросу о публикации биографии А.Н. Радищева в 1858 году // Локус: люди, общество, культуры, смыслы. 2021. Т. 12. № 1. С. 11-19. doi: 10.31862/2500-2988-2021-12-1-11-19. Liechtenhan F. Catherine II: Le courage triomphant. Paris: Perrin. 2021. 480 р. Citot V. V. La philosophie russe // Histoire mondiale de la philosophie: Une histoire comparée des cycles de la vie intellectuelle dans huit civilisations. Paris cedex 14: Presses Universitaires de France, 2022. P. 233-276. doi: 10.3917/puf.citot.2022.01.0233 Зеньковский В. В. История русской философии. М.: ЭКСМО-Пресс, 2001. 894 с. Лосский Н. О. История русской философии. М.: Азбука, 2022. 608 с. Stanziani A. Chapitre 1. Le miroir russe // Les métamorphoses du travail contraint: Une histoire globale (XVIIIe-XIXe siècles). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. 2020. P. 17-47. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения: в 30 т. М.: Госполитиздат, 1954. Т. 20. 827 с.
Supplementary files
