Self-mention in Chinese linguistic MA novices’ and experts’ academic writing: A corpus-driven investigation of ‘we’

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The research aims to conduct a comparative analysis of self-mention, particularly the usage of self-mention ‘we’, as a means of academic persuasion between Chinese linguistic MA novices and linguistic experts. Self-mentions serve various rhetorical functions in academic persuasion. However, for second language writers, mastering these rhetorical functions represents an advanced writing skill, which is contingent upon a proficient command of the structural aspects of self-mention phrases. In light of this issue, this study undertakes a collocation and chunk analysis. The objective is to analyze the collocation characteristics and chunk features of self-mention ‘we’ in international journal articles (ILJA_C) and Chinese MA theses (CLMA_C). This objective informs the choice of the research subject – identifying similarities and differences in the utilization of self-mention ‘we’ in two databases: ILJA_C and CLMA_C. This study’s methodology utilizes a corpus-driven approach alongside comparative academic discourse analysis within academic writing. The novelty of this research lies in its investigation of the collocation characteristics and chunk features of self-mention ‘we’ in CLMA_C and ILJA_C. This study represents a substantial contribution to the fields of second language acquisition and comparative linguistics by enhancing our understanding of self-mention in academic persuasion. Findings reveal significant disparities in the usage of ‘we’ between Chinese MA novices and linguistic experts. Novices tend to focus on constructing discourse logic, whereas experts prioritize establishing academic positions. Analysis of chunk structures exposes varying approaches to discourse and interpersonal functions, underscoring the necessity for novices to emulate expert usage patterns.

References

  1. Зуева В. В. Просодические особенности научных текстов // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017. № 10–2 (76). C. 80–83.
  2. Щемелева И. Ю. Местоимения как средство передачи авторской позиции в английском и русском научных текстах // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. 2013. № (4). С. 143–153.
  3. Bennett K. English academic style manuals: A survey // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2009. № 8 (1). P. 43–54.
  4. Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G. N., Conrad S., Finegan E. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021.
  5. Brezina V., Weill-Tessier V., McEnery A. Lancsbox (6.0). 2020 [Software]. Режим доступа: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox/ (дата обращения: 5.12.2023).
  6. Fløttum K. Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2007.
  7. Hyland K. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles // English for Specific Purposes. 2001. № 20 (3). P. 207–226.
  8. Hyland K. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing // Journal of Pragmatics. 2002. № 8. P. 1091–1112.
  9. Hyland K. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation // English for Specific Purposes. 2008. № 27 (1). P. 4–21.
  10. Hyland K., Jiang F. Academic Discourse and Global Publishing: Disciplinary Persuasion in Changing Times. London: Routledge, 2019.
  11. Jiang F. Stance construction and interpersonal interaction of shell nouns // Modern Foreign Languages. 2016. № 4. P. 470–482+583.
  12. Jiang F. Stance and voice in academic writing // International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 2017. № 1. P. 85–106.
  13. Jiang F. Corpora and EAP studies. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2019.
  14. Jiang F. A diachronic multi-dimensional investigation into the stylistic features in academic discourse // Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2020. № 52 (5). P. 663–673+798.
  15. Jiang F., Hyland K. Prescription and reality in advanced academic writing // Ibérica. 2020. № 39. P. 14–42.
  16. Lou B. Exploration of Corpus Application in Teaching Academic English for Graduate Students // Degree and Postgraduate Education. 2020. № 7. P. 51–56.
  17. Oakes M. P. Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
  18. Sun L. A Study on the Use of Metadiscourse and Identity Construction Features in Chinese Master’s Academic English Writing // Journal of Xi’an International Studies University. 2020. № 28 (4). P. 28–33.
  19. Sun Y. An analysis of the genre structure patterns in the “Introduction” section of Chinese students’ master’s theses in English majors // Foreign Languages in China. 2010. № 7(6). P. 54–60+78.
  20. Tang R., John S. The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun // English for Specific Purposes. 1999. № 18. P. 23–39.
  21. Walková M. A three-dimensional model of personal self-mention in research papers // English for Specific Purposes. 2019. № 53. P. 60–73.
  22. Wang J., Jiang F. Stance construction in academic English writing by Chinese PhD students of science and engineering // Foreign Language World. 2019. № 3. P. 23–31.
  23. Yang X. (Self-mention and authorial identity construction in second language academic writing // Foreign Languages and Their Teaching. 2015. № (4). P. 50–56.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).