Mechanisms of Influence of Western Media Strategies on Public Opinion in Developing Countries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The work systematizes the latest foreign studies showing that citizens of the Global South increasingly receive news primarily through digital platforms of Western media holdings, which reinforces their dependence on external information sources. The analysis of the updated concept of "smart soft power" demonstrates that strategic narrativization and cultural citation remain key tools for the influence of Western actors in the networked environment. Authoritarian players adopt Western media tactics, intensifying competition for the agenda and altering the balance of information flows in developing countries. Negative framing of the region in global news leads to economic losses—overestimation of risks costs Africa up to £3.2 billion annually. The "CNN effect" theory remains relevant: emotional reporting accelerates the formation of public demand for external intervention, as evidenced by the Indonesian case from 2016 to 2021. Influence is more often determined by prolonged media agendas rather than isolated messages, which the Al Jazeera Institute analysis emphasizes. The established typology of mechanisms—content framing, algorithmic distribution, partner news networks, and cultural co-branding—offers practical recommendations for states and NGOs to enhance media literacy and diversify information flows. An integrative review of 67 English-language scholarly sources (2019–2025) was conducted using the PRISMA protocol. The analysis combines qualitative and quantitative methods. The theoretical framework includes the concepts of soft power, framing, and encoding/decoding. The main findings of the research highlight four interconnected mechanisms of the influence of Western media strategies on public opinion in the Global South: content framing, algorithmic distribution, partner news networks, and cultural co-branding; establish direct economic losses of up to £3.2 billion annually for African countries due to negative framing; and confirm the relevance of the CNN effect based on the Indonesian case from 2016 to 2021. The author's special contribution to the study of the topic is the systematization of the "smart soft power" concept in relation to the digital environment and the development of a typology of long-term effects of influence. The novelty of the study lies in a comprehensive analysis of the hybrid impact of editorial and algorithmic tools, as well as in formulating practical recommendations for states and NGOs to strengthen media literacy, diversify information flows, and reduce economic risks arising from distorted perceptions of developing countries.

About the authors

Yaxin Huang

Email: awesome.yaxin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-3866-439X

References

  1. Chung M., Wihbey J. The algorithmic knowledge gap within and between countries: Implications for combatting misinformation // HKS Misinformation Review. 2024. Vol. 5, № 4. P. 1-17. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-155. URL: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/the-algorithmic-knowledge-gap (дата обращения: 05.06.2025). EDN: WLGJKH
  2. López-Rabadán P. Framing studies evolution in the social media era. Digital advancement and reorientation of the research agenda // Social Sciences. 2022. Vol. 11, № 1. Art. 9. P. 1-18. doi: 10.3390/socsci11010009. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/1/9 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025). EDN: XIGWFP
  3. Almakaty S.S. Agenda setting theory in the age of digital media: An analytical perspective // Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture. 2024. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 1743-1751. URL: https://esiculture.com/index.php/esiculture/article/view/1539 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  4. Putra B.A. The CNN effect in Indonesia: Re-arguing the relevance of communication theories in international relations // Frontiers in Communication. 2024. Vol. 9. Art. 1467727. P. 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1467727. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1467727 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025). EDN: YCAKHI
  5. Zhang Y. The power of cross-cultural communication: Reception and impact of Chinese variety shows on YouTube // Frontiers in Communication. 2025. Vol. 10. Art. 1542139. P. 1-20. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1542139. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1542139 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  6. Jin D.Y. The rise of digital platforms as a soft power apparatus in the New Korean Wave // Global Media and China. 2023. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 234-252. doi: 10.1177/20570473241234204. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20570473241234204 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025). EDN: SNATHV
  7. Wijaya L. What's in a name? Imagined territories and sea names in the South China Sea conflict // International Journal of Communication. 2023. Vol. 17. P. 5645-5668. URL: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20157 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  8. Harcup T. The struggle for news value in the digital era // Journalism and Media. 2023. Vol. 4, № 3. P. 902-917. doi: 10.3390/journalmedia4030058. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/4/3/58 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025). EDN: QTPHDA
  9. Huszár F. et al. Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter // arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11010. 2021. 38 p. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2110.11010. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11010 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  10. Traberg C.S., Roozenbeek J., van der Linden S. Gamified inoculation reduces susceptibility to misinformation from political ingroups // HKS Misinformation Review. 2024. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 1-15. URL: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/gamified-inoculation-reduces-susceptibility (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  11. Africa Practice; Africa No Filter. The cost of media stereotypes to Africa: The relationship between media, investment and economic development. October 2024. 35 p. URL: https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2024/10/16/Cost_of_Media_Stereotypes_Full_Report_Oct24.pdf (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  12. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Digital News Report 2024. Oxford, 2024. 164 p. URL: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  13. UNESCO. Journalism is a public good: World trends in freedom of expression and media development. Global report 2021/2022. Paris, 2022. 160 p. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380618 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  14. Kimeu C. Negative stereotypes in international media cost Africa £3.2 bn a year - report // The Guardian. 17 Oct 2024. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2024/oct/17/media-stereotypes-africa (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).
  15. Associated Press. In global game of influence, China turns to a cheap and effective tool: fake news. 27 Oct 2024. URL: https://apnews.com/article/3085f10d6edca36f6415d6410e5ef874 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).