Features of the functioning of advisive speech acts in crisis discourse (on the example of the flood in the Orenburg region in 2024)
- Authors: Lyulina A.V.1, Elagina Y.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 90-98
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8698/article/view/379193
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2025.6.71080
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZWDLJF
- ID: 379193
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The object of this study is speech acts with a dominant advisive intention used by representatives of official services and administrative structures in the texts of messages related to the flooding in the Orenburg region in 2024. As the subject of this study, the features of the functioning of advisive speech acts in crisis discourse affecting such a natural disaster as a flood in a certain area (using the example of the Orenburg region) are considered. At the same time, advisive speech acts are considered as three-component formations consisting of informative, actually communicative and intrusive components and having special signs in their composition that actualize certain targets of manipulation by a mass recipient. The hierarchy of relevant manipulation targets includes ethophysiological manipulation targets (instincts, needs, basic emotions) and socially conditioned manipulation targets of the mass recipient. The study uses an anthropocentric approach based on the belief that there is an average intentional portrait of a mass recipient with certain peculiarities of perception of manipulative messages. The novelty of this work lies in the use of an anthropocentric approach to study advisive messages with a hidden manipulative intention, as well as in the research material consisting of a corpus of texts that appeared as a result of the emergence of a new type of discourse - crisis discourse a natural disaster (for example, the flood of 2024 in the Orenburg region). In addition, for the first time, the study highlights speech tools of various levels that actualize the targets of manipulation by the mass recipient, which are characteristic of the subspecies of the crisis discourse being highlighted. A classification of these tools is proposed based on the features of the structure of advisive speech acts, the informative and intrusive components of which include special actualizers-nominees and actualizers-associates with the intended producer of the corresponding manipulative messages by distant and contact communicative effects.
About the authors
Anna Vladimirovna Lyulina
Email: aavvmt@mail.ru
Yuliya Sergeevna Elagina
Email: dymok_july@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6351-9710
References
- Беляева Е.И. Грамматика и прагматика побуждения: английский язык. Воронеж: Изд-во Воронеж. гос. ун-та, 1992. 168 с.
- Богданов В. В. Классификация речевых актов // Личностные аспекты языкового общения: Сб. науч. тр. Калинин, 1989. С. 25-37.
- Пильгун Е.В. Семантика и прагматика кризисного дискурса : автореф. дис. ...к-та филол. наук. Минск: МГЛУ, 2019. 28 с.
- Пильгун, Е. В. Стратегии формирования коммуникативного пространства многополярного мира // Политическая лингвистика. 2023. № 6. С. 122-130.
- Саранцацрал Ц. Речевые акты побуждения, их типы и способы выражения в русском языке : автореф. дис. ... д-ра филол. наук. Москва: МГУ, 1993. 40 с.
- Спицына Н.А., Рощенко А.В. Лингвистические особенности освещения техногенной кризисной ситуации. М.: Библио-Глобус, 2020. 118 с.
- Челоне Ч. Видовая оппозиция русских императивных глаголов в прескриптивных и суггестивных речевых актах // Вестник Пермского университета. Российская и зарубежная филология. 2018. Т. 10. Вып. 4. С. 87-96.
- Шутова О.А. Совет как суггестивный речевой жанр поучающего дискурса // Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. 2019. Т. 5. Вып. 138. С. 129-134.
- Austin J. How to do things with words. Oxford, 1962. VII.
- Searle J. R. A. Classification of Illocutionary acts // Language in Society. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 1-23.
Supplementary files

