Signaling and Tactical Hedging as Political Tools in the Formation of Minilateral Security Coalitions: Quad and AUKUS in the Indo-Pacific Region
- Авторлар: Mafuang S.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Шығарылым: № 4 (2024)
- Беттер: 30-40
- Бөлім: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8671/article/view/358777
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8671.2024.4.72184
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UTULYI
- ID: 358777
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Негізгі сөздер
Әдебиет тізімі
Mearsheimer J.J. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia // Chin. J. Int. Polit. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 381–396. Keohane R.O. Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research // Int. J. 1990. Vol. 45, № 4. P. 731–764. Ruggie J.G. Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution // Int. Organ. 1992. Vol. 46, № 3. P. 561–598. Tago A. Multilateralism, Bilateralism, and Unilateralism in Foreign Policy. Oxford University Press, 2017. Singh B., Teo S. Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific: The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism, and ASEAN. London: Routledge, 2020. 156 p. Tirkey A. Minilateralism: Weighing the Prospects for Cooperation and Governance // ORF Issue Brief. 2021. № 489. P. 1–25. Naim M. Minilateralism The magic number to get real international action. 2009. Falkner R. A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits, and International Legitimacy // Perspect. Polit. 2016/03/21 ed. Cambridge University Press, 2016. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 87–101. Eckersley R. Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? // Glob. Environ. Polit. 2012. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 24–42. Anuar A., Hussain N. Minilateralism for multilateralism in the post‑COVID age // Rajaratnam Sch. Int. Stud. RSIS. 2021. Teo S. Could Minilateralism Be Multilateralism’s Best Hope in the Asia Pacific? [Electronic resource]. 2018. URL: https://thediplomat.com/2018/12/could-minilateralism-be-multilateralisms-best-hope-in-the-asia-pacific/ (accessed: 25.10.2024). Wilkin T.S. et al. Indo-Pacific Minilateralism Strategic Competition (I): Australia/Japan and Chinese Approaches Compared: Occasional Paper. Pacific Forum International, 2024. Koga K. Tactical hedging as coalition-building signal: The evolution of Quad and AUKUS in the Indo-Pacific // Br. J. Polit. Int. Relat. 2024. P. 1–26. Farrell J., Gibbons R. Cheap Talk with Two Audiences // Am. Econ. Rev. American Economic Association, 1989. Vol. 79, № 5. P. 1214–1223. Kertzer J.D., Rathbun B.C., Rathbun N.S. The Price of Peace: Motivated Reasoning and Costly Signaling in International Relations // Int. Organ. 2019/11/05 ed. Cambridge University Press, 2020. Vol. 74, № 1. P. 95–118. Ciorciari J.D., Haacke J. Hedging in international relations: an introduction // Int. Relat. Asia-Pac. 2019. Vol. 19, № 3. P. 367–374. Fenton C., Langley A. Strategy as Practice and the Narrative Turn // Organ. Stud. 2011. Vol. 32, № 9. P. 1171–1196. Miskimmon A., O’Loughlin B., Roselle L. Strategic Narratives | Communication Power and the New World Order | A. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2013. 240 p. Miller J.D. The Conditions for Cooperation // India, Japan, Australia: Partners in Asia? / ed. Miller J.D. Australian National University Press., 1968. P. 195–212. Koga K. A New Strategic Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific // Asia Policy. 2022. Vol. 17, № 4. P. 27–34. Hambrick D.C., Lovelace J.B. The Role of Executive Symbolism in Advancing New Strategic Themes in Organizations: A Social Influence Perspective // Acad. Manage. Rev. Academy of Management, 2018. Vol. 43, № 1. P. 110–131. Koga K. Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” strategy : Tokyo’s tactical hedging and the implications for ASEAN // Contemp. Southeast Asia. 2019. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 286–313. Alvesson M. The Business Concept as a Symbol // Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. Taylor & Francis, Ltd., 1998. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 86–108. Koga K. Quad 3.0: Japan, Indo-Pacific and Minilateralism // East Asian Policy. 2022. Vol. 14, № 01. P. 20–38. The White House. Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: “The Spirit of the Quad” [Electronic resource] // The White House. 2021. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/ (accessed: 27.10.2024). The White House. Fact Sheet: Quad Leaders’ Summit [Electronic resource] // The White House. 2021. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/24/fact-sheet-quad-leaders-summit/ (accessed: 27.10.2024). Bisley N. The Quad, AUKUS and Australian Security Minilateralism: China’s Rise and New Approaches to Security Cooperation // J. Contemp. China. Routledge, 2024. Vol. 0, № 0. P. 1–13. Koga K. Institutional Dilemma: Quad and ASEAN in the Indo-Pacific // Asian Perspect. 2023. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 27–48. Wilkins T. Minilateral groupings as an alternative to multilateralism in an era of strategic competition // Issues & Insights / ed. Baker C. Pacific Forum Internatioanal, 2023. Vol. 23. P. 35–40.
Қосымша файлдар
