Activity and epistemological significance of the principle of participation in foresight practice
- Authors: Pirozhkova S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 12 (2024)
- Pages: 78-89
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-7144/article/view/372974
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YCAOPY
- ID: 372974
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article presents the results of research of a forecasting, planning and management of social processes. It is shown that this activity claims to be a complex one, integrating traditional forms of activity that realize cognitive and active attitude to the future (forecasting, planning, design, reflection). At the same time, foresight also performs as an ideological framework that unites the above-mentioned forms of activity without integrating them into a holistic activity. The demands, in response to which the foresight was formed, have been identified. It is shown that the relevance to these demands requires foresight to focus on the integration of various resources involved in the processes of social systems management – epistemic, methodological, organisational, etc. It is shown that in the light of this task, the so-called principle of participation or participatory approach is constitutive for foresight. This principle implies the participation of social actors without proper training in professional activities (which traditionally include social forecasting, social design, management, etc.). A detailed characterisation of this principle is given, examples of its operation in the field of social sciences and social action are given. It is substantiated that the implementation of this principle explains why foresight goes beyond the boundaries of specialised scientific research and science-based social design without turning into a social technology. It is revealed that foresight is characterised by a poly-agent structure, which from the epistemological and activity points of view is also poly-subjective, but in special conditions foresight allow us to move from poly-subjectivity to collective subjectivity, turning foresight into an instrument of social cohesion. Finally, the author’s assessment of the limits and prospects for the applicability of the participatory principle in the practice of foresight is given.
About the authors
Sophia Vladislavovna Pirozhkova
Email: pirozhkovasv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4477-4422
References
Пирожкова С.В. Форсайт («Foresight») как форма социального проектирования // Философия науки и техники. 2019. Т. 24. № 2. С. 109–123. Foresight as a StrategicLong-Term Planning Toolfor Developing Countries. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence, 2014. Popper R. Mapping Foresight. Revealing how Europe and other world regions navigate into the future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2009. 128 p. Пирожкова С.В. Прогнозные и футурологические исследования: к вопросу разграничения компетенций // Философские науки. 2016. № 8. С. 100–113. Grunberg E. Predictability and Reflexivity // American Journal of Economics & Sociology. 1986. Vol. 45(4). P. 475–488. Розин В.М. Социальная технология «форсайт» или политика и общество? // Политика и Общество. 2014. № 11. С. 1419–1441. URL: https://e-notabene.ru/psmag/article_54310.html Centre for Strategic Futures. Official Website. URL: https://www.csf.gov.sg/ Committee for the Future. Special section on Parliament of Finland’ Website. URL: https://www.eduskunta.fi/EN/valiokunnat/tulevaisuusvaliokunta/Pages/default.aspx National Institute of Science and Technology Policy. Official Website. URL:https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/ Форсайт-центр. Официальная страница. URL: https://foresight.hse.ru/ Березной А. Корпоративный Форсайт в стратегии транснационального бизнеса // Форсайт. 2017. Т. 11. № 1. С. 9–22. Форсайт-флот. Создавая реальное будущее вместе. 2012–2016. URL: https://asi.ru/foresighttrip/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2019). Касавин И.Т. Об эмпирической базе исследования социальных технологий: типологические соображения // Наука и социальные технологии / Отв. Ред. И.Т. Касавин. М.: ИФ РАН, 2011. С. 3–8. Coates V., Farooque M., Klavans R. et al. On the future of technological forecasting // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2001. Vol. 67(1). P. 1–17. Pirozhkova S.V. Socio-Humanistic Support for Technological Development: What Should It Be Like? // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 88(3). P. 210–219. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice / Ed. by P. Reason and H. Bradbury. London: Open University Press, 2008. 720 p. Haklay M. Citizen Science and Policy: A European Perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2015. 67 p. Halal W.E., Brown B.S. Participative management: myth and reality // California Management Review. 1981. Vol. XXIII. No. 4. P. 20–32. Kyamusugulwa P.M. Participatory Development and Reconstruction: a literature review // Third World Quarterly. 2013 Vol. 34. No. 7. P. 1265–1278. Киященко Л.П. Философия трансдисциплинарности: подходы к определению // Трансдисциплинарность в философии и науке. Подходы. Проблемы. Перспективы / Под ред. Р. Шольца, В. Бажанова. М.: Навигатор, 2015. С. 109–135. Пирожкова С.В. Принцип участия и современные механизмы производства знаний в науке // Эпистемология и философия науки / Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2018. Т. 55. № 1. С. 67−82. UNIDO Technology Foresight Manual. Vol. 1. Organization and Methods. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2005. 247 p. URL: https://forschungsnetzwerk.ams.at/dam/jcr:a7d1fdce-a692-4652-841d-f87f31f79881/unido_volume1_unido_tfores_manual.pdf (дата обращения 30.10.2024). Hayek F.A. The Use of Knowledge in Society // The American Economist Review. 1945. No. 4. P. 519–530. Лепский, В.Е. Методологический и философский анализ развития проблематики управления. Москва: Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Когито-Центр», 2019. 340 с. Назаретян А.П. Цивилизационные кризисы в контексте универсальной истории. (Синергетика – психология – прогнозирование.) 2-е изд. М.: Мир, 2004. 367 с. Седов Е.А. Одна формула и весь мир. Книга об энтропии. М.: Знание, 1982. 176 с.
Supplementary files

