Economic and political causes for transformations of social policy in the 20th century
- Authors: Podolskiy V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 12 (2023)
- Pages: 81-91
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-7144/article/view/372722
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SYARQO
- ID: 372722
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper analyses dynamics of social policy in the 20th century in Germany, Britain, France, Spain, Russia, the USA and China as the largest states, where the largest changes in the field of social security took place. The existing approaches to the typology of social states are considered. The article studies reasons for the formation, changes and organisation of the social security systems, the mutual influence of the different states in the field of social policy. The article presents an assessment of the problems faced by social states, evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of different models of social policy, and overview of changes in models in different countries. Economic and political factors influencing decision-making in the field of social policy, as well as the consequences of social reforms, are analyzed. Analysis of the causes of transformations in social policy is carried out through the study of institutions, regulations, and statistical data. The organization, regulation and modernization of pension and health insurance systems, benefits, allowances and subsidies for certain categories of consumers in the 20th century was caused by large-scale economic and political transformations. Mass industrial production made goods more accessible, and redistribution systems became a tool for balancing the market and ensuring the sustainability of the economy. Democratization and expansion of suffrage, the spread of radical ideologies or changes in political regimes created a demand for means of ensuring social stability, which was supplied by the social programs. The increase in spending on social policy began to create problems for the sustainability of budgets at the end of the 20th century, which led to attempts to limit social programs, but a reduction in spending did not occur due to the political and economic importance that the welfare state has acquired in the 20th century.
References
Кижикина В.В. Эволюция системы социальной защиты населения в России (сравнение со странами Европы) // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Экономика. 2013. №3 (23) С. 80-94. Сидорина Т.Ю. История и теория социальной политики. Москва: РГГУ, 2012. 555 с. Советская социальная политика: сцены и действующие лица, 1940–1985 / под ред. Е.Р. Ярской-Смирновой, П.В. Романова. Москва: Вариант, 2008. 373 с. Эрхард, Л. Благосостояние для всех. Москва: Дело, 2001. 332 с. Blank F. The German welfare system: The calm after the storm // Routledge Handbook of European Welfare Systems. Ed. by S. Blum, J. Kuhlmann, K. Schubert. Oxon: Routledge , 2020. P. 110–128. Comin F. Los seguros sociales y el estado de bienestar en el siglo XX. Los origenes del estado de bienestar en Espana, 1900–1945. / Eds. J. Pons Pons, J. S. Rodriguez. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza, 2011, 17–50. Deeming C. The United Kingdom: New Devolved Welfare Systems in Britain // Routledge Handbook of European Welfare Systems. Ed. by S. Blum, J. Kuhlmann, K. Schubert. Oxon: Routledge, 2020. P. 522–543. Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization / Ed. by U. Ascoli, C. Ranzi. New-York: Springer, 2002. 278 p. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1996. 257 p. Fraser D. The Evolution of the British Welfare State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 458 P. Goodin R.E. Reasons for Welfare: Economic, sociological and political – but ultimately moral // Responsibility, rights and welfare. The theory of the welfare state / Ed. By J.D. Moon. New York: Routledge, 2019. P. 19-54. Guillen A. M. Defrosting the Spanish welfare state: the weight of conservative components // A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in Continental Europe. Ed. by B. Palier. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010. P. 183–206. Han K. Social Welfare in Transitional China. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 426 p. Harris B. The origins of the British Welfare State. Social welfare in England and Wales, 1800–1945. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 414 p. Hassenteufel P., Palier B. The recalibration of the French welfare system // Routledge Handbook of European Welfare Systems. Ed. by S. Blum, J. Kuhlmann, K. Schubert. Oxon: Routledge, 2020. P. 202–219. Karger H.J., Stoesz D. American social welfare policy. A pluralist approach. New York: Pearson, 2018. 443 p. Kaufmann F.-X. Variations of the Welfare State: Great Britain, Sweden, France and Germany between Capitalism and Socialism. Berlin: Springer, 2013. 260 p. Mangen S. P. Spanish society after Franco. Regime transition and the welfare state. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001. 242 p. Pierson P. Irresistible forces, immovable objects: post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity // Journal of European Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 5. Iss. 4. P. 539-560. Stolleis M. History of Social Law in Germany. Berlin: Springer, 2013. 258 p. The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare state / Ed. By D. Beland, K.J. Morgan, H.Obinger and C. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2021. 1024 p. The Oxford Handbook of U.S. social policy / Ed. by Beland D., Howard C., Morgan K.J. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 668 p. Trattner W.I. From poor law to welfare state: a history of social welfare in America. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1994. 413 p. Wang Y. Social Security in China: On the Possibility of Equitable Distribution. Singapore: Springer, 2017. 179 p. Wilensky H.J., Lebeaux C.N. Industrial society and social welfare. New York: Russell sage foundation, 1958. 401 p.
Supplementary files

