The origins of hacktivism and criminal legal counteraction to its manifestations
- Authors: Efimovskii A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 12 (2023)
- Pages: 48-58
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-7136/article/view/367994
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DVBMBD
- ID: 367994
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article comprehensively examines cybersecurity issues, as well as the origins and principles of hacktivism, and gives their definitions. The tools used by hacktivists in their destructive activities are examined and their classification is presented. The criminal legal characteristics of the types of crimes used by hacktivists when carrying out cyber attacks are determined. The importance and necessity of proper measures to overcome the phenomenon of hacktivism is presented. The existing criminal legal methods of countering manifestations of hacktivism, available in Russian criminal legislation, are analyzed. Measures to counter IT threats of an organizational and technical nature are proposed. The topic under study requires further collection and processing of empirical material in order to identify new methods of committing cyber attacks on critical infrastructure and developing new approaches to combating this type of crime, ensuring uniform practice. Hacktivism is a new phenomenon in the IT environment. Hacktivism does not imply material benefit from the acts committed, which makes it difficult to classify and differentiate from related groups. Thus, a scientific interpretation and elaboration of a unified conceptual apparatus is required to ensure a uniform practice of identifying and countering this type of socially dangerous acts. The article concludes that the methods practiced by hacktivists when carrying out cyber attacks are described and have their own qualifications in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. However, it must be taken into account that attacks are often carried out from the territory of other countries and the groups themselves are transnational. Therefore, to successfully counter these destructive phenomena, it is necessary to develop international cooperation in law enforcement and unify responsibility for such acts. Countering hacktivism requires a comprehensive approach that includes legal, technical and social components.
References
Смирнов А. И., Григорьев В. Р., Кохтюлина И. Н., Куроедов Б. В., Сандаров О. В. Глобальная безопасность в цифровую эпоху: стратагемы для России / А. И. Смирнов, В. Р. Григорьев, И. Н. Кохтюлина Б. В. Куроедов, О. В. Сандаров. – Москва : Государственный научный центр Российской Федерации Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт геологических, геофизических и геохимических систем, 2014. – 394 с. Пучков О. А. Разграничение понятий «информационная безопасность» и «кибербезопасность» в законодательстве Российской Федерации, доктрине и юридической практике // Право и государство: теория и практика. – 2019. – №5 (173). – С. 66-69. Капто А. С. Кибервойна: генезис и доктринальные очертания // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2013. Т. 83. № 7. С. 616. Панарин, И. Н. Информационная война и выборы / И. Н. Панарин ; И. Н. Панарин. – Москва : Городец, 2003. – 411 с. Акопов, Г. Л. Хактивизм – угроза информационной безопасности в информационном социуме / Г. Л. Акопов // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки СКАГС. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 195-199. Романовская Е. А. «Публично-правовые основы противодействия доксингу» Электронный научный журнал «Наука. Общество. Государство». 2023. Т. 11, № 2. С. 70. Vincent A. Don’t feed the phish: how to avoid phishing attacks. Network Security. 2019; 2:11–14. Яковлева, А. В. Кибербезопасность и ее правовое регулирование (зарубежный и российский опыт) / А. В. Яковлева // Социально-политические науки. – 2021. – Т. 11, № 4. – С. 70-81.
Supplementary files
